Suboptimal complementary feeding practices remain a significant challenge in LMICs. Peer support shows promise in improving these practices; however, their long-term success hinges on sustained engagement and integration into existing support systems, aspects that remain poorly understood. This theory-led systematic review aimed to understand why people participate, support, and continue using peer support for complementary feeding practices. The literature search covered studies conducted between January 1990 and February 2025. This pragmatic, Normalisation Process Theory-led review employs an integrative mixed-methods synthesis. We conducted a theory-informed systematic review guided by the four subconstructs of cognitive participation, presenting the findings narratively into barriers and facilitators. While peer-led complementary feeding promotion involves multiple actors at different levels, few studies directly included family members and caregivers beyond mothers, thereby limiting their cognitive participation. Most studies were donor-driven. Financial, structural, sociocultural, training, and capacity-related factors strongly influence peer-led complementary feeding support. Their influences were not fixed; what served as facilitators in the initial stages of studies became barriers later, and vice versa. Household and local leaders and gatekeepers constrained peer support early in the interventions, but this later reversed with their involvement. Incentives boosted interest and increased enrolment. However, this also led to volunteers being less motivated and to attrition when resources were limited. Weak supportive supervision diminished the legitimacy of peer support, causing a loss of confidence in volunteers' skills. Keeping the momentum of early implementation stages requires a predictable funding model, primarily from domestic sources, and sustained engagement in the intervention. This can address multifaceted operational problems, ranging from recruitment to embedding the intervention in the health system. Political commitment, especially when translated into operational support, can strengthen the financial sustainability of peer support programmes.
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators to Cognitive Participation in Peer Support for Complementary Feeding in LMICs: A Theory-Informed Systematic Review","authors":"Asnake Ararsa Irenso, Hirbo Shore, Karen Campbell, Rachel Laws","doi":"10.1111/mcn.70154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.70154","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Suboptimal complementary feeding practices remain a significant challenge in LMICs. Peer support shows promise in improving these practices; however, their long-term success hinges on sustained engagement and integration into existing support systems, aspects that remain poorly understood. This theory-led systematic review aimed to understand why people participate, support, and continue using peer support for complementary feeding practices. The literature search covered studies conducted between January 1990 and February 2025. This pragmatic, Normalisation Process Theory-led review employs an integrative mixed-methods synthesis. We conducted a theory-informed systematic review guided by the four subconstructs of cognitive participation, presenting the findings narratively into barriers and facilitators. While peer-led complementary feeding promotion involves multiple actors at different levels, few studies directly included family members and caregivers beyond mothers, thereby limiting their cognitive participation. Most studies were donor-driven. Financial, structural, sociocultural, training, and capacity-related factors strongly influence peer-led complementary feeding support. Their influences were not fixed; what served as facilitators in the initial stages of studies became barriers later, and vice versa. Household and local leaders and gatekeepers constrained peer support early in the interventions, but this later reversed with their involvement. Incentives boosted interest and increased enrolment. However, this also led to volunteers being less motivated and to attrition when resources were limited. Weak supportive supervision diminished the legitimacy of peer support, causing a loss of confidence in volunteers' skills. Keeping the momentum of early implementation stages requires a predictable funding model, primarily from domestic sources, and sustained engagement in the intervention. This can address multifaceted operational problems, ranging from recruitment to embedding the intervention in the health system. Political commitment, especially when translated into operational support, can strengthen the financial sustainability of peer support programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mcn.70154","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145963922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emily M. Melnick, Francesco Acciai, Nicole Vaudrin O'Reilly, Ana Bea Ronan, Mindy Jossefides, Shreya Raval, Tatum Dykstra, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati
In 2021, participants in the United States Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) received an unprecedented increase in a cash-value benefit for fruits and vegetables (CVB) as a part of their monthly food package. Responses to this increase among WIC staff and American Indian populations are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to assess perceptions and diet-related behaviors of both WIC staff and participants within an Indian Tribal Organization state agency following the CVB increase. To accomplish these objectives, we conducted interviews with WIC local agency staff members (n = 15) and distributed a survey to WIC participants (n = 1,587) at the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona WIC. Thematic analysis of interviews showed that the CVB increase enabled WIC staff to provide more actionable nutrition education regarding fruits and vegetables and that staff and participants highly valued higher CVB amounts. Participant survey results showed improved fruit and vegetable consumption and high satisfaction following the increase, especially among households receiving larger amounts of CVBs. Interview and survey findings both suggested that limited access to fresh produce on rural tribal lands may limit benefits of the CVB increase. Taken together, findings indicate that both WIC staff and participants have very positive perceptions of the CVB increase. However, systemic barriers to redemption on rural tribal lands highlight the need for additional strategies to improve benefit use.
{"title":"WIC Participant and Local Agency Staff Perspectives on Increased Cash-Value Benefits for Fruits and Vegetables Within an American Indian Tribal Organization","authors":"Emily M. Melnick, Francesco Acciai, Nicole Vaudrin O'Reilly, Ana Bea Ronan, Mindy Jossefides, Shreya Raval, Tatum Dykstra, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati","doi":"10.1111/mcn.70148","DOIUrl":"10.1111/mcn.70148","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2021, participants in the United States Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) received an unprecedented increase in a cash-value benefit for fruits and vegetables (CVB) as a part of their monthly food package. Responses to this increase among WIC staff and American Indian populations are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to assess perceptions and diet-related behaviors of both WIC staff and participants within an Indian Tribal Organization state agency following the CVB increase. To accomplish these objectives, we conducted interviews with WIC local agency staff members (<i>n</i> = 15) and distributed a survey to WIC participants (<i>n</i> = 1,587) at the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona WIC. Thematic analysis of interviews showed that the CVB increase enabled WIC staff to provide more actionable nutrition education regarding fruits and vegetables and that staff and participants highly valued higher CVB amounts. Participant survey results showed improved fruit and vegetable consumption and high satisfaction following the increase, especially among households receiving larger amounts of CVBs. Interview and survey findings both suggested that limited access to fresh produce on rural tribal lands may limit benefits of the CVB increase. Taken together, findings indicate that both WIC staff and participants have very positive perceptions of the CVB increase. However, systemic barriers to redemption on rural tribal lands highlight the need for additional strategies to improve benefit use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12723200/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}