{"title":"Investigations on kaolin mixtures: Impact on mullite formation kinetics and microstructure evolution","authors":"Nabil Sadli, Abdelghani May, Mohamed Hamidouche, Abdelkhalek Henniche, Hocine Belhouchet, Hassane Boudouh","doi":"10.1111/ijac.14820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluates Algerian kaolin (Djebel Debbagh (DD1) and Tamazart (KT2)) as potential substitutes for commercial kaolin (Lab) in the production of mullite-based ceramics. Three compositions were prepared by incorporating the appropriate percentage of alumina to each calcined kaolin to achieve stoichiometric mullite precursors. The phase evolution of individual kaolin powders, as well as their mixtures with alumina, depends strongly on the calcination temperature and kaolin impurities. The differential scanning calorimetry combined with thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed lower secondary mullite formation temperature for the KT2-based mixture. However, X-ray diffraction revealed a complete mullitization in DD1 mixture. The K<sub>2</sub>O hindered cristobalite formation and reduced secondary mullite formation rate. Microstructure analysis showed lath-shaped primary mullite and equi-axed secondary mullite particles. After sintering at 1600°C, The KT2-based sample (M3) exhibited higher density (3.013 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and hardness (9.9 GPa), whereas the DD2-based sample (M2) showed moderate densification (2.91 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and higher flexural strength (159.42 MPa). Impurities (mainly Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, and K<sub>2</sub>O) promoted liquid phase sintering, resulting in greater densification in M3, whereas M2 showed more homogeneous microstructure, refined grains, and lower glassy phase content, contributing to enhanced strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":13903,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology","volume":"21 6","pages":"3950-3966"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijac.14820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates Algerian kaolin (Djebel Debbagh (DD1) and Tamazart (KT2)) as potential substitutes for commercial kaolin (Lab) in the production of mullite-based ceramics. Three compositions were prepared by incorporating the appropriate percentage of alumina to each calcined kaolin to achieve stoichiometric mullite precursors. The phase evolution of individual kaolin powders, as well as their mixtures with alumina, depends strongly on the calcination temperature and kaolin impurities. The differential scanning calorimetry combined with thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed lower secondary mullite formation temperature for the KT2-based mixture. However, X-ray diffraction revealed a complete mullitization in DD1 mixture. The K2O hindered cristobalite formation and reduced secondary mullite formation rate. Microstructure analysis showed lath-shaped primary mullite and equi-axed secondary mullite particles. After sintering at 1600°C, The KT2-based sample (M3) exhibited higher density (3.013 g/cm3) and hardness (9.9 GPa), whereas the DD2-based sample (M2) showed moderate densification (2.91 g/cm3) and higher flexural strength (159.42 MPa). Impurities (mainly Fe2O3, and K2O) promoted liquid phase sintering, resulting in greater densification in M3, whereas M2 showed more homogeneous microstructure, refined grains, and lower glassy phase content, contributing to enhanced strength.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology publishes cutting edge applied research and development work focused on commercialization of engineered ceramics, products and processes. The publication also explores the barriers to commercialization, design and testing, environmental health issues, international standardization activities, databases, and cost models. Designed to get high quality information to end-users quickly, the peer process is led by an editorial board of experts from industry, government, and universities. Each issue focuses on a high-interest, high-impact topic plus includes a range of papers detailing applications of ceramics. Papers on all aspects of applied ceramics are welcome including those in the following areas:
Nanotechnology applications;
Ceramic Armor;
Ceramic and Technology for Energy Applications (e.g., Fuel Cells, Batteries, Solar, Thermoelectric, and HT Superconductors);
Ceramic Matrix Composites;
Functional Materials;
Thermal and Environmental Barrier Coatings;
Bioceramic Applications;
Green Manufacturing;
Ceramic Processing;
Glass Technology;
Fiber optics;
Ceramics in Environmental Applications;
Ceramics in Electronic, Photonic and Magnetic Applications;