Electronic Nudges to Increase Influenza Vaccination in Patients With Chronic Diseases

JAMA Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.21060
Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Ankeet S. Bhatt, Daniel Modin, Safia Chatur, Brian L. Claggett, Kira Hyldekær Janstrup, Carsten Schade Larsen, Lykke Larsen, Lothar Wiese, Michael Dalager-Pedersen, Lars Køber, Scott D. Solomon, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Cyril Jean-Marie Martel, Tyra Grove Krause, Tor Biering-Sørensen
{"title":"Electronic Nudges to Increase Influenza Vaccination in Patients With Chronic Diseases","authors":"Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Ankeet S. Bhatt, Daniel Modin, Safia Chatur, Brian L. Claggett, Kira Hyldekær Janstrup, Carsten Schade Larsen, Lykke Larsen, Lothar Wiese, Michael Dalager-Pedersen, Lars Køber, Scott D. Solomon, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Cyril Jean-Marie Martel, Tyra Grove Krause, Tor Biering-Sørensen","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.21060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceDespite strong worldwide guideline recommendations, influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal among young and middle-aged patients with chronic diseases. Effective scalable strategies to increase vaccination are needed.ObjectiveTo investigate whether electronically delivered letter-based nudges informed by behavioral science could increase influenza vaccination uptake among patients aged 18 to 64 years with chronic diseases.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsNationwide pragmatic registry-based randomized clinical implementation trial conducted between September 24, 2023, and May 31, 2024, enrolling all Danish citizens aged 18 to 64 years who met criteria for free-of-charge influenza vaccination in light of preexisting chronic disease. All trial data were sourced from nationwide administrative health registries.InterventionRandomized in 2.45:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio to no letter (usual care) or 6 different behaviorally informed electronic letters.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was receipt of influenza vaccination on or before January 1, 2024, assessed in 7 prespecified coprimary comparisons (all intervention groups pooled vs usual care and each individual intervention group vs usual care). Absolute risk difference in proportions and a crude relative risk were calculated for each comparison.ResultsA total of 299 881 participants (53.2% [159 454] female, median age, 52.0 [IQR, 39.8-59.0] years) were randomized. Compared with usual care, influenza vaccination rates were higher among those receiving any intervention letter (any intervention letter, 39.6% vs usual care, 27.9%; difference, 11.7 percentage points; 99.29% CI, 11.2-12.2 percentage points; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). Each individual letter type significantly increased influenza vaccination with the largest effect sizes observed with a repeated letter sent 10 days after the initial letter (repeated letter, 41.8% vs usual care, 27.9%; difference, 13.9 percentage points; 99.29% CI, 13.1-14.7 percentage points; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) and a letter emphasizing potential cardiovascular benefits of vaccination (cardiovascular gain, 39.8% vs usual care, 27.9%; difference, 11.9 percentage points; 99.29% CI, 11.1-12.7 percentage points; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). Vaccination rates were improved across major subgroups.Conclusions and RelevanceIn a nationwide randomized clinical implementation trial, electronically delivered letter-based nudges markedly increased influenza vaccination compared with usual care among young and middle-aged patients with chronic diseases. The results of this study suggest that simple, scalable, and cost-efficient electronic letter strategies may have substantial public health implications.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06030739\">NCT06030739</jats:ext-link>","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.21060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceDespite strong worldwide guideline recommendations, influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal among young and middle-aged patients with chronic diseases. Effective scalable strategies to increase vaccination are needed.ObjectiveTo investigate whether electronically delivered letter-based nudges informed by behavioral science could increase influenza vaccination uptake among patients aged 18 to 64 years with chronic diseases.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsNationwide pragmatic registry-based randomized clinical implementation trial conducted between September 24, 2023, and May 31, 2024, enrolling all Danish citizens aged 18 to 64 years who met criteria for free-of-charge influenza vaccination in light of preexisting chronic disease. All trial data were sourced from nationwide administrative health registries.InterventionRandomized in 2.45:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio to no letter (usual care) or 6 different behaviorally informed electronic letters.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was receipt of influenza vaccination on or before January 1, 2024, assessed in 7 prespecified coprimary comparisons (all intervention groups pooled vs usual care and each individual intervention group vs usual care). Absolute risk difference in proportions and a crude relative risk were calculated for each comparison.ResultsA total of 299 881 participants (53.2% [159 454] female, median age, 52.0 [IQR, 39.8-59.0] years) were randomized. Compared with usual care, influenza vaccination rates were higher among those receiving any intervention letter (any intervention letter, 39.6% vs usual care, 27.9%; difference, 11.7 percentage points; 99.29% CI, 11.2-12.2 percentage points; P &amp;lt; .001). Each individual letter type significantly increased influenza vaccination with the largest effect sizes observed with a repeated letter sent 10 days after the initial letter (repeated letter, 41.8% vs usual care, 27.9%; difference, 13.9 percentage points; 99.29% CI, 13.1-14.7 percentage points; P &amp;lt; .001) and a letter emphasizing potential cardiovascular benefits of vaccination (cardiovascular gain, 39.8% vs usual care, 27.9%; difference, 11.9 percentage points; 99.29% CI, 11.1-12.7 percentage points; P &amp;lt; .001). Vaccination rates were improved across major subgroups.Conclusions and RelevanceIn a nationwide randomized clinical implementation trial, electronically delivered letter-based nudges markedly increased influenza vaccination compared with usual care among young and middle-aged patients with chronic diseases. The results of this study suggest that simple, scalable, and cost-efficient electronic letter strategies may have substantial public health implications.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06030739
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过电子提示提高慢性病患者的流感疫苗接种率
重要性尽管全球范围内的指南都提出了强有力的建议,但中青年慢性病患者的流感疫苗接种率仍未达到最佳水平。需要有效的、可扩展的策略来提高疫苗接种率。目的研究基于行为科学的电子信件提示是否能提高18至64岁慢性病患者的流感疫苗接种率。设计、设置和参与者2023年9月24日至2024年5月31日期间,在全国范围内开展了基于注册登记的随机临床实施试验,招募了所有年龄在18至64岁之间、因已有慢性病而符合免费接种流感疫苗标准的丹麦公民。所有试验数据均来自全国范围内的行政健康登记。干预以2.45:1:1:1:1:1:1:1的比例随机分配到无信件(常规护理)或6种不同的行为知情电子信件。主要结果和测量主要终点是在2024年1月1日或之前接受流感疫苗接种,通过7个预先指定的共同比较(所有干预组汇总与常规护理比较以及每个干预组与常规护理比较)进行评估。结果 共有 299 881 名参与者(53.2% [159 454] 女性,中位年龄 52.0 [IQR,39.8-59.0]岁)接受了随机治疗。与常规护理相比,接受任何干预信件的人的流感疫苗接种率更高(任何干预信件,39.6% vs 常规护理,27.9%;差异,11.7 个百分点;99.29% CI,11.2-12.2 个百分点;P &amp;lt; .001)。每种信件类型都能明显提高流感疫苗的接种率,其中在首次发信 10 天后重复发信的效果最大(重复发信,41.8% vs 常规护理,27.9%;差异,13.9 个百分点;99.29% CI,13.1-14.7 个百分点;P&amp;lt; .001)。1-14.7个百分点;P&amp;lt; .001)和一封强调接种疫苗对心血管潜在益处的信(心血管收益,39.8% vs 常规护理,27.9%;差异,11.9个百分点;99.29% CI,11.1-12.7个百分点;P&amp;lt; .001)。结论与意义在一项全国范围的随机临床实施试验中,与常规护理相比,以电子信件为基础的电子提示显著提高了中青年慢性病患者的流感疫苗接种率。这项研究结果表明,简单、可扩展且具有成本效益的电子信件策略可能会对公共卫生产生重大影响。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT06030739
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How AI Could Reshape Health Care—Rise in Direct-to-Consumer Models Harm Reduction Strategies for People Who Use Drugs Emergency Clinician Buprenorphine Initiation, Subsequent Prescriptions, and Continuous Prescriptions Illicit Substance Use and Treatment Access Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness Embracing Neurodiversity in Medicine—Building a More Inclusive Physician Workforce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1