[Translated article] Diagnosis of Onychomycosis: Utility of an Immunochromatography Strip Test Compared with Conventional Culture.

IF 3.8 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Actas dermo-sifiliograficas Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ad.2024.10.013
L Fernández-Fuente, S Herrero-Ruiz, B Echeverría-García, J García-Martínez, J Borbujo
{"title":"[Translated article] Diagnosis of Onychomycosis: Utility of an Immunochromatography Strip Test Compared with Conventional Culture.","authors":"L Fernández-Fuente, S Herrero-Ruiz, B Echeverría-García, J García-Martínez, J Borbujo","doi":"10.1016/j.ad.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ringworm is highly prevalent in our setting and is frequently observed in our routine clinical practice. Diagnostic confirmation depends on techniques that are not always accessible (PCR), with highly variable sensitivity depending on the observer (direct microscopy) or delayed results (culture, histopathology). Recently, an immunochromatography-based rapid test (Diafactory®) for the antigenic detection of dermatophytes has been developed. This diagnostic tool can help diagnose ringworm, allowing early initiation of treatment and fewer consultation visits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen detection test compared to conventional culture.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For a full year, 333 nail samples were collected from patients with suspected onychomycosis. The rapid test and the conventional culture were simultaneously performed on each sample. Those with a positive antigenic test result began treatment early. The remaining patients had appointments for serial cultures and subsequent medical consultation to evaluate the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to conventional culture, the sensitivity and specificity rates of the rapid antigen detection test are 97.2% and 80.7%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effectiveness of the rapid antigen detection test is similar to that of conventional culture for the detection of dermatophytes in nail samples. It is a quick and simple diagnostic technique that reduces the number of patient visits to the hospital, and allows early treatment start.</p>","PeriodicalId":7173,"journal":{"name":"Actas dermo-sifiliograficas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas dermo-sifiliograficas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2024.10.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ringworm is highly prevalent in our setting and is frequently observed in our routine clinical practice. Diagnostic confirmation depends on techniques that are not always accessible (PCR), with highly variable sensitivity depending on the observer (direct microscopy) or delayed results (culture, histopathology). Recently, an immunochromatography-based rapid test (Diafactory®) for the antigenic detection of dermatophytes has been developed. This diagnostic tool can help diagnose ringworm, allowing early initiation of treatment and fewer consultation visits.

Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen detection test compared to conventional culture.

Material and methods: For a full year, 333 nail samples were collected from patients with suspected onychomycosis. The rapid test and the conventional culture were simultaneously performed on each sample. Those with a positive antigenic test result began treatment early. The remaining patients had appointments for serial cultures and subsequent medical consultation to evaluate the results.

Results: Compared to conventional culture, the sensitivity and specificity rates of the rapid antigen detection test are 97.2% and 80.7%, respectively.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of the rapid antigen detection test is similar to that of conventional culture for the detection of dermatophytes in nail samples. It is a quick and simple diagnostic technique that reduces the number of patient visits to the hospital, and allows early treatment start.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲癣的诊断。与培养法相比,快速抗原检测试验更有用。
背景:癣菌在我们的环境中非常普遍,在日常工作中也经常可以观察到。诊断确认依赖于一些技术,但这些技术并非总能获得(聚合酶链反应),其敏感性因观察者的不同而有很大差异(直接显微镜检查),或者只能提供延迟结果(培养、组织病理学)。最近,一种基于免疫层析技术的快速皮癣菌抗原检测试剂被开发出来,名为 Diafactory®。这种诊断工具可用于体癣的诊断,以便尽早开始治疗并减少就诊次数:材料与方法:在一年的时间里,从疑似甲癣患者身上采集了 333 份指甲样本。对每个样本同时进行快速检测和培养。抗原检测结果呈阳性的患者尽早开始治疗。其余患者则预约进行连续培养,并在随后的医疗咨询中对结果进行评估:结果:与培养相比,快速抗原检测试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为 97.2% 和 80.7%:结论:在检测指甲样本中的皮癣菌方面,快速抗原检测试验的效果可与培养相媲美。这是一种快速、简单的诊断技术,可以减少患者到医院就诊的次数,并尽早开始治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
473
审稿时长
56 weeks
期刊介绍: Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas, publicación Oficial de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, es una revista de prestigio consolidado. Creada en 1909, es la revista mensual más antigua editada en España.En 2006 entró en Medline, y hoy resulta imprescindible para estar al día sobre la dermatología española y mundial.
期刊最新文献
Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm: A Single-Center Experience. Clinical Characterization, Mutational Landscape, and Clinical Outcome of Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Intensive Therapy. Bullous Tinea. ¿Cuál es la visión de los estudiantes de medicina sobre la Dermatología? Un estudio transversal usando la herramienta Mentimeter. Administración transdérmica de fentanilo ante fracaso cutáneo agudo: riesgos a considerar en Urgencias de Dermatología. Amiloidosis nodular cutánea primaria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1