Service users perspectives on psychosis-risk terminology: An Italian study on labeling terms preferences and stigma

Abstract

Aims

The current range of labeling terms—at-risk mental state (ARMS), ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR), and attenuated psychotic syndrome (APS)—used to refer to the psychosis-risk concept is varied, and their acceptability and potential stigma are not well understood. By involving Italian youth with lived experience of mental ill-health, we aimed to generate new labeling terms for psychosis-risk, and to evaluate literacy, attitudes, and preferences regarding these and the existing terms. Additionally, we investigated opinions of disclosure of the at-risk concept in clinical practice.

Methods

Through a dual-moderator focus group, novel diagnostic terms were coined for the at-risk concept: psychosis proneness (PP), change of personal reality (CPR), and hints of subjectivity dysregulation (HSD). A specifically designed questionnaire was then completed by 47 help-seeking youths, 60 relatives, and 61 clinicians to test newly generated and already established at-risk terms.

Results

Literacy on already established terms was significantly lower among youth (mean= 42 %) and relatives (mean= 38 %). ARMS was the preferred and least stigmatizing term among young people and clinicians. UHR was considered the most stigmatizing label. Among newly generated terms, CPR was the least stigmatizing and most informative. Disclosure of at-risk terminology was generally preferred after establishing a trusting clinician-patient relationship.

Conclusions

Findings support ARMS as a useful and acceptable term in clinical practice with young people, while UHR is associated with the highest stigma. CPR is promising and should be tested in cross-cultural studies. In Italy, there is an urgent need for improving literacy on prevention in mental health.