Predictive factors for additional surgeries in drug-resistant epilepsy after mesial temporal laser interstitial thermal therapy

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110074
Behnaz Esmaeili , Andrew L. Ko , John W. Miller
{"title":"Predictive factors for additional surgeries in drug-resistant epilepsy after mesial temporal laser interstitial thermal therapy","authors":"Behnaz Esmaeili ,&nbsp;Andrew L. Ko ,&nbsp;John W. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We aimed to identify factors predicting additional surgical interventions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who continue experiencing seizures after mesial temporal laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). In a retrospective observational study, we analyzed consecutive patients with drug-resistant temporal epilepsy treated with mesial temporal LITT at the University of Washington between 2013–2022. The primary outcome was subsequent epilepsy surgery to improve seizure control after LITT. Logistic regression was used to assess how clinical factors and travel distance within tertiary center referral regions predict subsequent surgery occurrence. We identified 145 patients treated with mesial temporal LITT. Among the patients, 25 underwent subsequent surgeries, including 17 temporal lobectomies, 5 repeat LITT, 2 responsive neurostimulation, and 1 with deep brain stimulation. Further surgery was associated with higher Engel scores and shorter travel distance to our tertiary epilepsy center. Factors like age, sex, epilepsy duration, surgery on dominant hemisphere, and frequency of convulsive seizures were not significant. Patients who continue to have seizures after LITT are potential candidates for more surgery. Patients who must travel farther are less likely to receive follow-up surgery. Healthcare inequity presents a significant barrier in accessing epilepsy surgery, limiting the potential to achieve improved outcomes for individuals with epilepsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 110074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to identify factors predicting additional surgical interventions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who continue experiencing seizures after mesial temporal laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). In a retrospective observational study, we analyzed consecutive patients with drug-resistant temporal epilepsy treated with mesial temporal LITT at the University of Washington between 2013–2022. The primary outcome was subsequent epilepsy surgery to improve seizure control after LITT. Logistic regression was used to assess how clinical factors and travel distance within tertiary center referral regions predict subsequent surgery occurrence. We identified 145 patients treated with mesial temporal LITT. Among the patients, 25 underwent subsequent surgeries, including 17 temporal lobectomies, 5 repeat LITT, 2 responsive neurostimulation, and 1 with deep brain stimulation. Further surgery was associated with higher Engel scores and shorter travel distance to our tertiary epilepsy center. Factors like age, sex, epilepsy duration, surgery on dominant hemisphere, and frequency of convulsive seizures were not significant. Patients who continue to have seizures after LITT are potential candidates for more surgery. Patients who must travel farther are less likely to receive follow-up surgery. Healthcare inequity presents a significant barrier in accessing epilepsy surgery, limiting the potential to achieve improved outcomes for individuals with epilepsy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颞中叶激光间质热疗后耐药癫痫患者进行额外手术的预测因素。
我们的目的是找出耐药性癫痫患者在接受颞中叶激光间质热疗(LITT)后继续出现癫痫发作的额外手术干预的预测因素。在一项回顾性观察研究中,我们分析了 2013-2022 年间在华盛顿大学接受颞中叶激光间质热疗的连续耐药颞叶癫痫患者。主要结果是 LITT 后为改善癫痫发作控制而进行的后续癫痫手术。逻辑回归用于评估三级中心转诊区域内的临床因素和旅行距离如何预测后续手术的发生。我们确定了 145 名接受颞中叶 LITT 治疗的患者。其中 25 人接受了后续手术,包括 17 例颞叶切除术、5 例重复 LITT、2 例反应性神经刺激和 1 例脑深部刺激。进一步手术与较高的恩格尔评分和较短的前往三级癫痫中心的路程有关。年龄、性别、癫痫持续时间、优势半球手术和惊厥发作频率等因素均无显著影响。LITT后仍有癫痫发作的患者有可能接受更多手术。必须长途跋涉的患者接受后续手术的可能性较低。医疗不公平是接受癫痫手术的一大障碍,限制了癫痫患者获得更好治疗效果的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
Burn injuries in patients with epilepsy: A narrative review Extreme ambient temperatures and seizure outcomes in children with epilepsy: insights from a survey in Turkey Adaptive and cognitive trajectories in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy and intellectual disabilities Patient-reported outcome measures in patients with post-brain injury seizures Bullying victimisation as a mediator in the association between childhood epilepsy and later emotional and behavioural difficulties: Evidence from the British National Child development study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1