Decision Support Tool to Improve Decision-Making for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): Development Process and Alpha Testing.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.2196/57348
Wale Ajiboye, Abban Yusuf, Cheryl Pedersen, Rebecca Brown, Kristaps Dzonsons, LaRon Nelson
{"title":"Decision Support Tool to Improve Decision-Making for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): Development Process and Alpha Testing.","authors":"Wale Ajiboye, Abban Yusuf, Cheryl Pedersen, Rebecca Brown, Kristaps Dzonsons, LaRon Nelson","doi":"10.2196/57348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African, Caribbean, and Black (Black) communities in Canada are disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective option for the prevention of HIV. However, the use of PrEP for HIV prevention among eligible Black clients in Canada remains far below the thresholds necessary to achieve the goal of zero new HIV infections. In a recent study in Toronto, PrEP-eligible Black clients were found to have decisional conflict and unmet decisional needs, which affected the quality of their decision-making process regarding the initiation and adherence to PrEP. There is evidence that decision support tools (DSTs) can improve the quality of a decision, the quality of the decision-making process, the implementation or continuation of the chosen option, and the appropriate use of health services. Despite these benefits, there is currently no DST for PrEP-eligible Black clients being asked to consider PrEP for HIV prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study aimed to develop a DST to improve PrEP decision-making for Black clients and to evaluate the tool's acceptability and usability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and evaluated the PrEP DST for Black patients using the 7-step process outlined in the Ottawa Decision Support Group Guideline for the development and evaluation of DST. To facilitate the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Group guideline, we assembled a multidisciplinary team of primary health care providers, researchers, community members with lived experiences, and digital content designers to serve as the steering committee. First, we assessed patients' and primary health care providers' views on decisional support needs, after which we determined the content, design, and distribution plan for the DST. Subsequently, we conducted evidence synthesis, reviews, and appraisal before developing the PrEP DST prototype. The final tool was reviewed by steering committee members for completeness before acceptability and usability testing with potential Black clients and PrEP providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The web-based DST yielded 27 pages divided into 6 distinct sections. The six sections include (1) an introduction of the DST, (2) clarify your decision, (3) knowledge, (4) a value clarification exercise, (5) support system, and (6) next steps. Both Black clients and PrEP providers reported ease of task performance, general satisfaction, and usefulness of the tool to support decision-making for Black clients. Feedback on usability centered on the need to add a user guide to increase usability. All feedback was incorporated into the final tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A PrEP DST for Black clients developed using a systematic process and a multidisciplinary steering committee was acceptable and usable by both Black clients and PrEP providers. Further study (eg, randomized controlled trials) may be needed to evaluate the efficacy of the PrEP DST.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: African, Caribbean, and Black (Black) communities in Canada are disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective option for the prevention of HIV. However, the use of PrEP for HIV prevention among eligible Black clients in Canada remains far below the thresholds necessary to achieve the goal of zero new HIV infections. In a recent study in Toronto, PrEP-eligible Black clients were found to have decisional conflict and unmet decisional needs, which affected the quality of their decision-making process regarding the initiation and adherence to PrEP. There is evidence that decision support tools (DSTs) can improve the quality of a decision, the quality of the decision-making process, the implementation or continuation of the chosen option, and the appropriate use of health services. Despite these benefits, there is currently no DST for PrEP-eligible Black clients being asked to consider PrEP for HIV prevention.

Objective: Our study aimed to develop a DST to improve PrEP decision-making for Black clients and to evaluate the tool's acceptability and usability.

Methods: We developed and evaluated the PrEP DST for Black patients using the 7-step process outlined in the Ottawa Decision Support Group Guideline for the development and evaluation of DST. To facilitate the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Group guideline, we assembled a multidisciplinary team of primary health care providers, researchers, community members with lived experiences, and digital content designers to serve as the steering committee. First, we assessed patients' and primary health care providers' views on decisional support needs, after which we determined the content, design, and distribution plan for the DST. Subsequently, we conducted evidence synthesis, reviews, and appraisal before developing the PrEP DST prototype. The final tool was reviewed by steering committee members for completeness before acceptability and usability testing with potential Black clients and PrEP providers.

Results: The web-based DST yielded 27 pages divided into 6 distinct sections. The six sections include (1) an introduction of the DST, (2) clarify your decision, (3) knowledge, (4) a value clarification exercise, (5) support system, and (6) next steps. Both Black clients and PrEP providers reported ease of task performance, general satisfaction, and usefulness of the tool to support decision-making for Black clients. Feedback on usability centered on the need to add a user guide to increase usability. All feedback was incorporated into the final tool.

Conclusions: A PrEP DST for Black clients developed using a systematic process and a multidisciplinary steering committee was acceptable and usable by both Black clients and PrEP providers. Further study (eg, randomized controlled trials) may be needed to evaluate the efficacy of the PrEP DST.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善艾滋病毒暴露前预防 (PrEP) 决策的决策支持工具:开发过程与阿尔法测试。
背景:加拿大的非洲裔、加勒比裔和黑人(Black)社区受到艾滋病毒疫情的影响尤为严重。暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)是预防艾滋病毒的一种非常有效的方法。然而,加拿大符合条件的黑人客户使用 PrEP 预防艾滋病毒的情况仍远低于实现零艾滋病毒新感染目标所需的阈值。最近在多伦多进行的一项研究发现,符合 PrEP 条件的黑人客户存在决策冲突和决策需求未得到满足的问题,这影响了他们在启动和坚持使用 PrEP 方面的决策过程的质量。有证据表明,决策支持工具(DST)可以提高决策的质量、决策过程的质量、所选方案的实施或持续性,以及医疗服务的合理使用。尽管有这些好处,但目前还没有针对符合 PrEP 条件的黑人患者的 DST,要求他们考虑使用 PrEP 预防艾滋病:我们的研究旨在开发一种 DST,以改善黑人客户的 PrEP 决策,并评估该工具的可接受性和可用性:我们采用《渥太华决策支持小组 DST 开发与评估指南》中概述的 7 步流程,为黑人患者开发并评估了 PrEP DST。为促进渥太华决策支持小组指南的实施,我们组建了一个由初级医疗服务提供者、研究人员、有生活经验的社区成员和数字内容设计师组成的多学科团队,作为指导委员会。首先,我们评估了患者和初级医疗服务提供者对决策支持需求的看法,然后确定了 DST 的内容、设计和发布计划。随后,我们进行了证据综合、审查和评估,然后开发出 PrEP DST 原型。在对潜在的黑人客户和 PrEP 提供者进行可接受性和可用性测试之前,指导委员会成员对最终工具的完整性进行了审查:基于网络的 DST 共有 27 页,分为 6 个不同的部分。这六个部分包括:(1) DST 简介;(2) 明确您的决定;(3) 知识;(4) 价值澄清练习;(5) 支持系统;(6) 下一步。黑人客户和 PrEP 提供者都表示,该工具易于执行任务,总体上令人满意,而且对支持黑人客户的决策非常有用。对可用性的反馈主要集中在是否需要添加用户指南以提高可用性上。所有反馈意见均已纳入最终工具:针对黑人客户的 PrEP DST 是通过系统化流程和多学科指导委员会开发的,黑人客户和 PrEP 提供者均可接受并使用该工具。可能需要进一步研究(如随机对照试验)来评估 PrEP DST 的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Feasibility of AgileNudge+ Software to Facilitate Positive Behavioral Change: Mixed Methods Design. A Web-Based Intervention to Support a Growth Mindset and Well-Being in Unemployed Young Adults: Development Study. Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Virtual Reality for Remote Group-Mediated Physical Activity in Older Adults: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Associations Among Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Sleep Duration, and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in a Southeastern US Rural Community: Cross-Sectional Analysis From the SLUMBRx-PONS Study. Barriers, Facilitators, and Requirements for a Telerehabilitation Aftercare Program for Patients After Occupational Injuries: Semistructured Interviews With Key Stakeholders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1