Poor venous outflow is associated with hyperintense acute reperfusion marker on follow-up MRI in patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large vessel occlusion.
Aroosa Zamarud, Nicole Yuen, Anke Wouters, Michael Mlynash, Stephen M Hugdal, Pierre Seners, Jamie Kesten, Vivek Yedavalli, Tobias D Faizy, Gregory W Albers, Maarten G Lansberg, Jeremy J Heit
{"title":"Poor venous outflow is associated with hyperintense acute reperfusion marker on follow-up MRI in patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large vessel occlusion.","authors":"Aroosa Zamarud, Nicole Yuen, Anke Wouters, Michael Mlynash, Stephen M Hugdal, Pierre Seners, Jamie Kesten, Vivek Yedavalli, Tobias D Faizy, Gregory W Albers, Maarten G Lansberg, Jeremy J Heit","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) refers to delayed enhancement in the subarachnoid or subpial space on post-contrast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. HARM is a measure of blood-brain barrier breakdown, which has been correlated with poor outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). We hypothesized that unfavorable venous outflow (VO) would be correlated with HARM after thrombectomy treatment of AIS-LVO.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether poor VO is associated with HARM on follow-up MRI after stroke in patients with AIS-LVO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AIS-LVO from the prospective CRISP2 and DEFUSE2 studies with a baseline CT angiography (CTA) scan and a follow-up MRI with FLAIR sequence were screened for enrollment. VO was measured on the baseline CTA scan using the cortical venous opacification score (COVES). HARM was determined on FLAIR sequences at the follow-up MRI. The primary outcome was the occurrence of HARM between those with good VO (VO+; COVES 3-6) and bad VO (VO-; COVES 0-2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>121 patients were included; 60.3% (n=73) had VO+ and 39.7% (n=48) had VO-. Patients with VO- had higher presentation National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (18 (IQR 12-20) vs 12 (IQR 8-16) in VO+; P<0.001). Middle cerebral artery M1 segment occlusions were more common in VO- patients (65% vs 43% VO+; P=0.028). VO- patients also had a larger pre-treatment ischemic core (23 (4-44) mL vs 12 (3-22) mL in VO+; P=0.049) and Tmax >6 s volumes (105 (72-142) mL vs 66 (35-95) mL in VO+; P<0.001). VO- patients were more likely to develop HARM after thrombectomy (31% vs 10% in VO+; P=0.003). On multivariable regression analysis, VO- (OR=3.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 10.6); P=0.02) and the presence of any ICH (OR=3.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 10.5); P=0.02) were independently associated with the occurrence of HARM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with AIS-LVO, VO- correlated with HARM on post-thrombectomy MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) refers to delayed enhancement in the subarachnoid or subpial space on post-contrast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. HARM is a measure of blood-brain barrier breakdown, which has been correlated with poor outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). We hypothesized that unfavorable venous outflow (VO) would be correlated with HARM after thrombectomy treatment of AIS-LVO.
Objective: To determine whether poor VO is associated with HARM on follow-up MRI after stroke in patients with AIS-LVO.
Methods: Patients with AIS-LVO from the prospective CRISP2 and DEFUSE2 studies with a baseline CT angiography (CTA) scan and a follow-up MRI with FLAIR sequence were screened for enrollment. VO was measured on the baseline CTA scan using the cortical venous opacification score (COVES). HARM was determined on FLAIR sequences at the follow-up MRI. The primary outcome was the occurrence of HARM between those with good VO (VO+; COVES 3-6) and bad VO (VO-; COVES 0-2).
Results: 121 patients were included; 60.3% (n=73) had VO+ and 39.7% (n=48) had VO-. Patients with VO- had higher presentation National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (18 (IQR 12-20) vs 12 (IQR 8-16) in VO+; P<0.001). Middle cerebral artery M1 segment occlusions were more common in VO- patients (65% vs 43% VO+; P=0.028). VO- patients also had a larger pre-treatment ischemic core (23 (4-44) mL vs 12 (3-22) mL in VO+; P=0.049) and Tmax >6 s volumes (105 (72-142) mL vs 66 (35-95) mL in VO+; P<0.001). VO- patients were more likely to develop HARM after thrombectomy (31% vs 10% in VO+; P=0.003). On multivariable regression analysis, VO- (OR=3.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 10.6); P=0.02) and the presence of any ICH (OR=3.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 10.5); P=0.02) were independently associated with the occurrence of HARM.
Conclusions: In patients with AIS-LVO, VO- correlated with HARM on post-thrombectomy MRI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.