Poor long-term outcomes and abnormal neurodegeneration biomarkers after military traumatic brain injury: the ADVANCE study.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2024-333777
Neil Sn Graham, Grace Blissitt, Karl Zimmerman, Lydia Orton, Daniel Friedland, Emma Coady, Rhiannon Laban, Elena Veleva, Amanda J Heslegrave, Henrik Zetterberg, Susie Schofield, Nicola T Fear, Christopher J Boos, Anthony M J Bull, Alexander Bennett, David J Sharp
{"title":"Poor long-term outcomes and abnormal neurodegeneration biomarkers after military traumatic brain injury: the ADVANCE study.","authors":"Neil Sn Graham, Grace Blissitt, Karl Zimmerman, Lydia Orton, Daniel Friedland, Emma Coady, Rhiannon Laban, Elena Veleva, Amanda J Heslegrave, Henrik Zetterberg, Susie Schofield, Nicola T Fear, Christopher J Boos, Anthony M J Bull, Alexander Bennett, David J Sharp","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2024-333777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in military campaigns and is a risk factor for dementia. <i>A</i>rme<i>D</i> Ser<i>V</i>ices Tr<i>A</i>uma and Rehabilitatio<i>N</i> Out<i>C</i>om<i>E</i>-TBI (ADVANCE-TBI) aims to ascertain neurological outcomes in UK military personnel with major battlefield trauma, leveraging advances in quantification of axonal breakdown markers like neurofilament light (NfL), and astroglial marker glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) in blood. We aimed to describe the causes, prevalence and consequences of TBI, and its fluid biomarker associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TBI history was ascertained in 1145 servicemen and veterans, of whom 579 had been exposed to major trauma. Functional and mental health assessments were administered, and blood samples were collected approximately 8 years postinjury, with plasma biomarkers quantified (n=1125) for NfL, GFAP, total tau, phospho-tau<sub>181</sub>, amyloid-β 42 and 40. Outcomes were related to neurotrauma exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TBI was present in 16.9% (n=98) of exposed participants, with 46.9% classified as mild-probable and 53.1% classified as moderate to severe. Depression (β=1.65, 95% CI (1.33 to 2.03)), anxiety (β=1.65 (1.34 to 2.03)) and post-traumatic stress disorder (β=1.30 (1.19 to 1.41)) symptoms were more common after TBI, alongside poorer 6 minute walk distance (β=0.79 (0.74 to 0.84)) and quality of life (β=1.27 (1.19 to 1.36), all p<0.001). Plasma GFAP was 11% (95% CI 2 to 21) higher post-TBI (p=0.013), with greater concentrations in moderate-to-severe injuries (47% higher than mild-probable (95% CI 20% to 82%, p<0.001). Unemployment was more common among those with elevated GFAP levels post-TBI, showing a 1.14-fold increase (95% CI 1.03 to 1.27, p<0.001) for every doubling in GFAP concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TBI affected nearly a fifth of trauma-exposed personnel, related to worse mental health, motor and functional outcomes, as well as elevated plasma GFAP levels 8 years post-injury. This was absent after extracranial trauma, and showed a dose-response relationship with the severity of the injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-333777","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in military campaigns and is a risk factor for dementia. ArmeD SerVices TrAuma and RehabilitatioN OutComE-TBI (ADVANCE-TBI) aims to ascertain neurological outcomes in UK military personnel with major battlefield trauma, leveraging advances in quantification of axonal breakdown markers like neurofilament light (NfL), and astroglial marker glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) in blood. We aimed to describe the causes, prevalence and consequences of TBI, and its fluid biomarker associations.

Methods: TBI history was ascertained in 1145 servicemen and veterans, of whom 579 had been exposed to major trauma. Functional and mental health assessments were administered, and blood samples were collected approximately 8 years postinjury, with plasma biomarkers quantified (n=1125) for NfL, GFAP, total tau, phospho-tau181, amyloid-β 42 and 40. Outcomes were related to neurotrauma exposure.

Results: TBI was present in 16.9% (n=98) of exposed participants, with 46.9% classified as mild-probable and 53.1% classified as moderate to severe. Depression (β=1.65, 95% CI (1.33 to 2.03)), anxiety (β=1.65 (1.34 to 2.03)) and post-traumatic stress disorder (β=1.30 (1.19 to 1.41)) symptoms were more common after TBI, alongside poorer 6 minute walk distance (β=0.79 (0.74 to 0.84)) and quality of life (β=1.27 (1.19 to 1.36), all p<0.001). Plasma GFAP was 11% (95% CI 2 to 21) higher post-TBI (p=0.013), with greater concentrations in moderate-to-severe injuries (47% higher than mild-probable (95% CI 20% to 82%, p<0.001). Unemployment was more common among those with elevated GFAP levels post-TBI, showing a 1.14-fold increase (95% CI 1.03 to 1.27, p<0.001) for every doubling in GFAP concentration.

Conclusions: TBI affected nearly a fifth of trauma-exposed personnel, related to worse mental health, motor and functional outcomes, as well as elevated plasma GFAP levels 8 years post-injury. This was absent after extracranial trauma, and showed a dose-response relationship with the severity of the injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事创伤性脑损伤后长期疗效不佳和神经变性生物标志物异常:ADVANCE 研究。
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)在军事行动中很常见,是痴呆症的一个危险因素。战地创伤和康复服务--创伤性脑损伤(ADVANCE-TBI)旨在利用血液中神经丝光(NfL)等轴突破坏标志物和星形胶质细胞标志物胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)的定量研究进展,确定英国战地重大创伤军人的神经系统结果。我们旨在描述创伤性脑损伤的原因、发病率和后果及其与体液生物标志物的关联:方法:对 1145 名军人和退伍军人进行了创伤性脑损伤病史调查,其中 579 人曾遭受过重大创伤。对他们进行了功能和心理健康评估,并在受伤后约 8 年采集了血液样本,对血浆生物标志物进行了量化(n=1125),包括 NfL、GFAP、总 tau、phospho-tau181、淀粉样蛋白-β 42 和 40。结果与受到的神经创伤有关:结果:16.9%(n=98)的受试者存在创伤性脑损伤,其中 46.9% 被归类为轻度可能创伤,53.1% 被归类为中度至重度创伤。创伤后抑郁(β=1.65,95% CI (1.33 至 2.03))、焦虑(β=1.65 (1.34 至 2.03))和创伤后应激障碍(β=1.30 (1.19 至 1.41))症状更为常见,同时 6 分钟步行距离(β=0.79 (0.74 至 0.84))和生活质量(β=1.27 (1.19 至 1.36),均较差:创伤性脑损伤影响了近五分之一的受创伤人员,导致其心理健康、运动和功能状况恶化,以及伤后8年血浆GFAP水平升高。这种情况在颅外创伤后并不存在,而且与创伤的严重程度呈剂量反应关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
期刊最新文献
Apheresis therapies in MOGAD: a retrospective study of 117 therapeutic interventions in 571 attacks. Response to: 'Cortical Inexcitability in ALS: Correlating a Clinical Phenotype'. MYH7-related myopathies: clinical, myopathological and genotypic spectrum in a multicentre French cohort. Huntington's disease phenocopy syndromes revisited: a clinical comparison and next-generation sequencing exploration. Exercise as medicine in Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1