Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-337779
Sezgi Kaçar, David R van Nederpelt, Julia R Jelgerhuis, Eline M E Coerver, Joep Killestein, Maria Pia Sormani, Olga Ciccarelli, Douglas L Arnold, Zoé L E van Kempen, B M J Uitdehaag, Frederik Barkhof, Marcus W Koch, Menno M Schoonheim, Arman Eshaghi, Eva M M Strijbis
Background: Brain atrophy is increasingly used as an outcome measure in clinical trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but little is known about how chronological age interacts with MS-specific effects. For instance, while annual brain atrophy rates typically increase with age in healthy individuals, MS patients tend to exhibit decreasing atrophy rates over time.
Methods: We investigated the relationship between age and brain volume in a large dataset of 4241 trial participants with RRMS. We used pooled individual-participant data from phase 3 clinical trials with 96 weeks follow-up, which included both active treatment and placebo/comparator arms. Participants were categorised into seven groups based on chronological age (18-24 years, 25-30 years, 31-35 years, 36-40 years, 41-45 years, 46-50 years, 51-56 years). We performed multilevel linear mixed-effects regression analyses to examine differences between age groups in normalised whole brain volume (NWBV), thalamus grey matter volume (NThGMV), grey matter volume (NGMV) and white matter volume at baseline and their changes over follow-up. We also studied how disease duration influenced these relationships using similar models.
Results: Older participants showed significantly lower NWBV, NGMV and NThGMV at baseline than younger participants. Most importantly, older participants exhibited lower rates of atrophy during follow-up, particularly in the thalamus. This association was consistent across all disease duration subgroups.
Conclusions: Older participants had more severe atrophy when enrolled into trials, but slower (thalamic) atrophy rates, independent of disease duration over time. Together, these findings emphasise that age should be taken into account when designing clinical trials that use brain atrophy as an outcome measure.
{"title":"Brain atrophy rates vary with age in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Sezgi Kaçar, David R van Nederpelt, Julia R Jelgerhuis, Eline M E Coerver, Joep Killestein, Maria Pia Sormani, Olga Ciccarelli, Douglas L Arnold, Zoé L E van Kempen, B M J Uitdehaag, Frederik Barkhof, Marcus W Koch, Menno M Schoonheim, Arman Eshaghi, Eva M M Strijbis","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-337779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337779","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain atrophy is increasingly used as an outcome measure in clinical trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but little is known about how chronological age interacts with MS-specific effects. For instance, while annual brain atrophy rates typically increase with age in healthy individuals, MS patients tend to exhibit decreasing atrophy rates over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the relationship between age and brain volume in a large dataset of 4241 trial participants with RRMS. We used pooled individual-participant data from phase 3 clinical trials with 96 weeks follow-up, which included both active treatment and placebo/comparator arms. Participants were categorised into seven groups based on chronological age (18-24 years, 25-30 years, 31-35 years, 36-40 years, 41-45 years, 46-50 years, 51-56 years). We performed multilevel linear mixed-effects regression analyses to examine differences between age groups in normalised whole brain volume (NWBV), thalamus grey matter volume (NThGMV), grey matter volume (NGMV) and white matter volume at baseline and their changes over follow-up. We also studied how disease duration influenced these relationships using similar models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older participants showed significantly lower NWBV, NGMV and NThGMV at baseline than younger participants. Most importantly, older participants exhibited lower rates of atrophy during follow-up, particularly in the thalamus. This association was consistent across all disease duration subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older participants had more severe atrophy when enrolled into trials, but slower (thalamic) atrophy rates, independent of disease duration over time. Together, these findings emphasise that age should be taken into account when designing clinical trials that use brain atrophy as an outcome measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146119319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-337168
Rosa Michaelis, Leonie Hagedorn, Anne Weissbach, Christoph van Riesen, Kirsten E Zeuner, Tamara Schmidt, Christina Bolte, Felix Bernsdorff, Maximilian J Löw, Carl A Gless, Annemarie Reincke, Desiree Sykora, Kathrin LaFaver, Alexander C Lehn, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Corinna Seliger, Stoyan Popkirov
Background: No disorder-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) has yet been validated for functional movement disorders (FMDs), leaving a critical gap in clinical care and research.
Objective: To validate the FMD questionnaire (FMDQ) in a prospectively recruited sample through a multicentre study.
Methods: Confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) tested the assumed structure of the questionnaire with factors reflecting severity of motor symptoms, impairment of everyday activities, impact of non-motor symptoms and impairment of social functioning. Internal consistency and floor/ceiling effects were examined. The 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), patient health questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), the fatigue assessment scale (FAS) and a clinician-rated scale corresponding to motor symptom items of the FMDQ (FMDQ-CR) were used to test criterion and construct validity. The minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed through distribution-based and anchor-based methods in a convenience sample of patients with follow-up assessments.
Results: Complete datasets from 157 patients were analysed; follow-up assessments were available from 30 patients. CFA confirmed that a four-factor model provides a better fit to the data compared with a more restrictive one-factor model. Internal consistency was appropriate for all factors/subscales. No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Criterion and content validity were supported by significant correlations with respective SF-36 subscores, PHQ-15, FAS and FMDQ-CR. Anchor-based MCID was estimated at 8 to 20 points, with the central value aligning with the distribution-based MCID of 12 points (8% of the total score range).
Conclusions: The FMDQ is a psychometrically robust PROM, making it a useful tool for clinical practice and treatment trials.
{"title":"Multicentre validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for functional movement disorders.","authors":"Rosa Michaelis, Leonie Hagedorn, Anne Weissbach, Christoph van Riesen, Kirsten E Zeuner, Tamara Schmidt, Christina Bolte, Felix Bernsdorff, Maximilian J Löw, Carl A Gless, Annemarie Reincke, Desiree Sykora, Kathrin LaFaver, Alexander C Lehn, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Corinna Seliger, Stoyan Popkirov","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-337168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337168","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No disorder-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) has yet been validated for functional movement disorders (FMDs), leaving a critical gap in clinical care and research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the FMD questionnaire (FMDQ) in a prospectively recruited sample through a multicentre study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) tested the assumed structure of the questionnaire with factors reflecting severity of motor symptoms, impairment of everyday activities, impact of non-motor symptoms and impairment of social functioning. Internal consistency and floor/ceiling effects were examined. The 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), patient health questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), the fatigue assessment scale (FAS) and a clinician-rated scale corresponding to motor symptom items of the FMDQ (FMDQ-CR) were used to test criterion and construct validity. The minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed through distribution-based and anchor-based methods in a convenience sample of patients with follow-up assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete datasets from 157 patients were analysed; follow-up assessments were available from 30 patients. CFA confirmed that a four-factor model provides a better fit to the data compared with a more restrictive one-factor model. Internal consistency was appropriate for all factors/subscales. No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Criterion and content validity were supported by significant correlations with respective SF-36 subscores, PHQ-15, FAS and FMDQ-CR. Anchor-based MCID was estimated at 8 to 20 points, with the central value aligning with the distribution-based MCID of 12 points (8% of the total score range).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FMDQ is a psychometrically robust PROM, making it a useful tool for clinical practice and treatment trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-337550
Grace McMacken, Mohammad Ashraghi, Lucas Keyes, Saiju Jacob, Channa Hewamadduma, Caroline Carmichael, Katherine C Dodd, Georgina Burke, Stuart Viegas, Camilla Buckley, Amy Jayne McKnight, Maria Farrugia, Maria Isabel Leite, John McConville
{"title":"Frequent co-occurrence of AChR-positive myasthenia gravis in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy suggests a novel disease association.","authors":"Grace McMacken, Mohammad Ashraghi, Lucas Keyes, Saiju Jacob, Channa Hewamadduma, Caroline Carmichael, Katherine C Dodd, Georgina Burke, Stuart Viegas, Camilla Buckley, Amy Jayne McKnight, Maria Farrugia, Maria Isabel Leite, John McConville","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-337550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337550","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-337505
Giorgia Coratti, Francesca Bovis, Valentina Franchino, Jacqueline Montes, Valeria Ada Sansone, Sally Dunaway Young, Chiara Cutrì, Amy Pasternak, Maria Carmela Pera, Marika Pane, Allan Glanzman, Elena Pegoraro, Tina Duong, Elena Sogus, Maria Sframeli, Sonia Messina, Elzo Cavalcante, Maria Cristina Scoto, Adele D'Amico, Rafael Rodriguez-Torres, Tiziana Mongini, Lorenzo Maggi, Michela Coccia, Massimiliano Filosto, Riccardo Zuccarino, Riccardo Masson, Giulia Ricci, Claudio Bruno, Lucia Ruggiero, Veria Vacchiano, Eustachio D'errico, Lorenzo Verriello, Vincenzo Nigro, Gaia Scarpini, Matteo Garibaldi, Mara Turri, Chiara Ticci, Angela Berardinelli, Caterina Agosto, Federica Ricci, Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham, Basil T Darras, John Day, Michio Hirano, Francesco Muntoni, Richard S Finkel, Eugenio Mercuri
Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neuromuscular disorder caused by survival motor neuron (SMN1) deletion. While loss of ambulation in SMA type III typically occurs at a median age of 13.4 years, outcomes in the treatment era remain unclear. This study aims to address that gap by investigating ambulation outcomes in individuals with type III receiving disease-modifying therapies.
Methods: This retrospective study analysed prospectively collected international data. Time-dependent Cox models assessed the association between treatment initiation and age at loss of ambulation, adjusting for age at onset, sex, SMN2 copies, birth year and country. Treatment was modelled as a time-dependent covariate to avoid immortal time bias. Descriptive analyses used Mann-Whitney U and χ² tests.
Results: Among 555 individuals with type III, treatment halved the risk of ambulation loss (HR=0.50), with median loss at 44 vs 32 years in treated and untreated groups. Later onset, ≥4 SMN2 copies and female sex were also protective. The treatment effect was significant in type IIIA (HR=0.34) but not IIIB, with no significant interactions by sex, country or SMN2, though effects remained directionally protective.
Conclusions: Treatment in type III reduced the risk of ambulation loss by 50%, extending median ambulation by 12 years, with the greatest benefit in type IIIA. Later onset, female sex and higher SMN2 copy number were also protective but did not modify treatment effect. These findings underscore the value of early treatment and support its broad use to preserve ambulation across clinical subgroups.
{"title":"Loss of ambulation in SMA III at the time of disease-modifying treatments: an international study.","authors":"Giorgia Coratti, Francesca Bovis, Valentina Franchino, Jacqueline Montes, Valeria Ada Sansone, Sally Dunaway Young, Chiara Cutrì, Amy Pasternak, Maria Carmela Pera, Marika Pane, Allan Glanzman, Elena Pegoraro, Tina Duong, Elena Sogus, Maria Sframeli, Sonia Messina, Elzo Cavalcante, Maria Cristina Scoto, Adele D'Amico, Rafael Rodriguez-Torres, Tiziana Mongini, Lorenzo Maggi, Michela Coccia, Massimiliano Filosto, Riccardo Zuccarino, Riccardo Masson, Giulia Ricci, Claudio Bruno, Lucia Ruggiero, Veria Vacchiano, Eustachio D'errico, Lorenzo Verriello, Vincenzo Nigro, Gaia Scarpini, Matteo Garibaldi, Mara Turri, Chiara Ticci, Angela Berardinelli, Caterina Agosto, Federica Ricci, Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham, Basil T Darras, John Day, Michio Hirano, Francesco Muntoni, Richard S Finkel, Eugenio Mercuri","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-337505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neuromuscular disorder caused by survival motor neuron (SMN1) deletion. While loss of ambulation in SMA type III typically occurs at a median age of 13.4 years, outcomes in the treatment era remain unclear. This study aims to address that gap by investigating ambulation outcomes in individuals with type III receiving disease-modifying therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analysed prospectively collected international data. Time-dependent Cox models assessed the association between treatment initiation and age at loss of ambulation, adjusting for age at onset, sex, SMN2 copies, birth year and country. Treatment was modelled as a time-dependent covariate to avoid immortal time bias. Descriptive analyses used Mann-Whitney U and χ² tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 555 individuals with type III, treatment halved the risk of ambulation loss (HR=0.50), with median loss at 44 vs 32 years in treated and untreated groups. Later onset, ≥4 SMN2 copies and female sex were also protective. The treatment effect was significant in type IIIA (HR=0.34) but not IIIB, with no significant interactions by sex, country or SMN2, though effects remained directionally protective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment in type III reduced the risk of ambulation loss by 50%, extending median ambulation by 12 years, with the greatest benefit in type IIIA. Later onset, female sex and higher SMN2 copy number were also protective but did not modify treatment effect. These findings underscore the value of early treatment and support its broad use to preserve ambulation across clinical subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146093176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-337301
Stephen Keddie, Michael P Lunn
{"title":"Poetry in practice.","authors":"Stephen Keddie, Michael P Lunn","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-337301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337301","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146093161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-336633
Trajano Aguiar Pires Gonçalves, Camila Derminio Donadel, Rodrigo Siqueira Soares Frezatti, Maria Cristina Lopes Schiavoni, Marcus Vinícius Magno Gonçalves, Pedro Manoel Marques Garibaldi, Gil Cunha de Santis, Wilson Marques Júnior, Pedro José Tomaselli
Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, M-protein and Skin changes (POEMS) syndrome is a rare multisystemic disorder associated with plasma cell dyscrasia, most commonly presenting with peripheral neuropathy. Due to its complex and heterogeneous clinical presentation, misdiagnosis is frequent, particularly with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, which often leads to delays in appropriate management. Peripheral nerve involvement in POEMS syndrome is predominantly demyelinating, typically accompanied by early axonal degeneration. Specific clinical, neurophysiological and imaging features are key to differentiating POEMS from other acquired demyelinating neuropathies. Elevated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) play a central role in its pathophysiology, promoting disruption of the blood-nerve barrier and contributing to the systemic manifestations. Accurate diagnosis requires a multidisciplinary approach and is often supported by laboratory testing, including VEGF measurement and monoclonal protein screening as well as advanced imaging techniques. Therapeutic strategies are guided by disease extent and include radiotherapy for localised lesions, systemic chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for disseminated disease. Early identification and intervention are essential to prevent irreversible nerve damage and optimise long-term functional outcomes. Prompt recognition of characteristic findings not only enables appropriate treatment but may also significantly improve patient prognosis.
{"title":"POEMS syndrome: a neuromuscular perspective.","authors":"Trajano Aguiar Pires Gonçalves, Camila Derminio Donadel, Rodrigo Siqueira Soares Frezatti, Maria Cristina Lopes Schiavoni, Marcus Vinícius Magno Gonçalves, Pedro Manoel Marques Garibaldi, Gil Cunha de Santis, Wilson Marques Júnior, Pedro José Tomaselli","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-336633","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-336633","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, M-protein and Skin changes (POEMS) syndrome is a rare multisystemic disorder associated with plasma cell dyscrasia, most commonly presenting with peripheral neuropathy. Due to its complex and heterogeneous clinical presentation, misdiagnosis is frequent, particularly with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, which often leads to delays in appropriate management. Peripheral nerve involvement in POEMS syndrome is predominantly demyelinating, typically accompanied by early axonal degeneration. Specific clinical, neurophysiological and imaging features are key to differentiating POEMS from other acquired demyelinating neuropathies. Elevated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) play a central role in its pathophysiology, promoting disruption of the blood-nerve barrier and contributing to the systemic manifestations. Accurate diagnosis requires a multidisciplinary approach and is often supported by laboratory testing, including VEGF measurement and monoclonal protein screening as well as advanced imaging techniques. Therapeutic strategies are guided by disease extent and include radiotherapy for localised lesions, systemic chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for disseminated disease. Early identification and intervention are essential to prevent irreversible nerve damage and optimise long-term functional outcomes. Prompt recognition of characteristic findings not only enables appropriate treatment but may also significantly improve patient prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146093158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-337198
Na Hu, Xiyue Yang, Feng Feng, Bing Zhang, Yaou Liu, Hui Gao, Qin Chen, Cun-Jin Zhang, Xiaochun Chen, Fuhua Yan, Sven Haller, Su Lui
{"title":"Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in Alzheimer's immunotherapy: a framework and challenges for global surveillance strategies.","authors":"Na Hu, Xiyue Yang, Feng Feng, Bing Zhang, Yaou Liu, Hui Gao, Qin Chen, Cun-Jin Zhang, Xiaochun Chen, Fuhua Yan, Sven Haller, Su Lui","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-337198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337198","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-337944
Franz Felix Konen, Franziska Axhausen, Stephanie Wolff, Pauline Mühlenbrock, Stefan Gingele, Konstantin Fritz Jendretzky, Sandra Nay, Lea Martha Grote-Levi, Philipp Schwenkenbecher, Sven G Meuth, Thomas Skripuletz, Steffen Pfeuffer
Background: The optimal strategy after discontinuation of B-cell depleting therapies like ocrelizumab in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) remains uncertain, particularly regarding delayed disease reactivation, disability progression and required treatment duration before cessation.
Methods: In this prospective two-centre observational cohort study with propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, we evaluated recurrence of disease activity and disability worsening after ocrelizumab discontinuation. PwMS fulfilling the 2017 McDonald criteria were enrolled between January 2018 and December 2023 at two German MS centres. Participants received ocrelizumab for ≥12 months with no inflammatory activity in the preceding 12 months. Of 655 eligible patients (continuers, n=578; discontinuers, n=77), 290 were included after 4:1 PSM. The primary exposure was discontinuation, mainly due to infection concerns during COVID-19 (81%) or hypogammaglobulinaemia (16%). Main outcomes were time to combined inflammatory activity (CIA) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) identified optimal treatment duration.
Results: After median follow-up of 28.5 months, there was no significant difference in CIA risk between groups (HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.08 to 10.79) or for PIRA (HR: 4.8, 95% CI 0.38 to 60.2). Beyond 24 months after discontinuation, disease activity remained stable, with a numerical rise that did not reach statistical significance. ROC analysis suggested no further reduction of activity beyond 29-30 months of therapy, but increasing reactivation risk after >32 months off-treatment.
Conclusions: For stable pwMS, ocrelizumab discontinuation after about 30 months on-treatment appears safe short-term, though vigilant monitoring is warranted beyond 2 years off-treatment due to potential delayed reactivation.
背景:多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者停用b细胞消耗疗法(如ocrelizumab)后的最佳策略仍不确定,特别是在延迟疾病再激活、残疾进展和停药前所需的治疗时间方面。方法:在这项采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析的前瞻性双中心观察队列研究中,我们评估了ocrelizumab停药后疾病活动和残疾恶化的复发。符合2017年麦当劳标准的PwMS于2018年1月至2023年12月在两个德国MS中心注册。参与者接受ocrelizumab治疗≥12个月,之前12个月无炎症活动。在655名符合条件的患者中(继续患者,n=578;停止患者,n=77), 290名患者接受了4:1 PSM治疗。主要暴露是停药,主要是由于COVID-19期间的感染担忧(81%)或低γ -球蛋白血症(16%)。主要结果为联合炎症活动时间(CIA)和独立于复发活动的进展(PIRA)。受试者工作特征(ROC)确定最佳治疗时间。结果:中位随访28.5个月后,两组CIA风险(HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.08 ~ 10.79)和PIRA风险(HR: 4.8, 95% CI 0.38 ~ 60.2)无显著差异。停药24个月后,疾病活动保持稳定,数字上升没有达到统计学意义。ROC分析显示,在治疗29-30个月后,活动没有进一步降低,但在治疗结束后bbb32个月后,活动风险增加。结论:对于稳定的pwMS, ocrelizumab在治疗约30个月后停药短期内是安全的,但由于可能延迟再激活,停药2年后仍有必要进行警惕监测。
{"title":"Discontinuation of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: reoccurrence of disease activity.","authors":"Franz Felix Konen, Franziska Axhausen, Stephanie Wolff, Pauline Mühlenbrock, Stefan Gingele, Konstantin Fritz Jendretzky, Sandra Nay, Lea Martha Grote-Levi, Philipp Schwenkenbecher, Sven G Meuth, Thomas Skripuletz, Steffen Pfeuffer","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-337944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337944","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal strategy after discontinuation of B-cell depleting therapies like ocrelizumab in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) remains uncertain, particularly regarding delayed disease reactivation, disability progression and required treatment duration before cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective two-centre observational cohort study with propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, we evaluated recurrence of disease activity and disability worsening after ocrelizumab discontinuation. PwMS fulfilling the 2017 McDonald criteria were enrolled between January 2018 and December 2023 at two German MS centres. Participants received ocrelizumab for ≥12 months with no inflammatory activity in the preceding 12 months. Of 655 eligible patients (continuers, n=578; discontinuers, n=77), 290 were included after 4:1 PSM. The primary exposure was discontinuation, mainly due to infection concerns during COVID-19 (81%) or hypogammaglobulinaemia (16%). Main outcomes were time to combined inflammatory activity (CIA) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) identified optimal treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After median follow-up of 28.5 months, there was no significant difference in CIA risk between groups (HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.08 to 10.79) or for PIRA (HR: 4.8, 95% CI 0.38 to 60.2). Beyond 24 months after discontinuation, disease activity remained stable, with a numerical rise that did not reach statistical significance. ROC analysis suggested no further reduction of activity beyond 29-30 months of therapy, but increasing reactivation risk after >32 months off-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For stable pwMS, ocrelizumab discontinuation after about 30 months on-treatment appears safe short-term, though vigilant monitoring is warranted beyond 2 years off-treatment due to potential delayed reactivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146010766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-337337
Karim L Kreft, Nienke J Mekkes, Emeka Uzochukwu, Sam Loveless, Ray Wynford-Thomas, Katharine Elizabeth Harding, Mark Wardle, Peter Holmans, J William L Brown, Michael Lawton, Emma Clare Tallantyre, Inge R Holtman, Neil P Robertson
Background: Predicting response to treatment and long-term disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains challenging. In other complex diseases, combining genetic risk variants has enabled the detection of relevant clinical endophenotypes associated with important outcomes, but this strategy has never been applied to MS.
Methods: We applied unsupervised hierarchical clustering to genomic risk scores in a prospective Welsh MS cohort (n=1455) and replicated the findings in the postmortem Netherlands Brain Bank (NBB) MS (NBB-MS) cohort (n=272). Disease progression was assessed using survival analysis to determine the time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) milestones.
Results: Three genomic clusters were identified, each with similar genetic profiles. Baseline demographics did not differ between clusters. Welsh patients in cluster 1 attained EDSS 6 and EDSS 8 significantly later than clusters 2 and 3 (by 6 years, p=3×10-3 and 13 years, p=0.02, respectively). These findings were replicated in the NBB-MS cohort (6-year delay to EDSS 6 for cluster 1 vs 2, p=0.04). Genomic clustering independently predicted disease progression (HRs 1.3-2.0, all p<0.05), beyond established risk factors. Clusters 2 and 3 showed a greater annual increase in T2 lesion load on serial MR imaging (p=0.04). In cluster 2, patients receiving disease-modifying treatments had delayed progression to EDSS 6 (p=3×10-³), while no such benefit was observed in clusters 1 or 3. Cluster 2 patients also had earlier onset of symptoms, including dysphagia (p=0.02) and spasticity (p=8×10-⁴) in the NBB-MS cohort.
Conclusions: Genetic clustering reveals clinically meaningful MS subtypes with distinct prognoses and treatment responses, highlighting its potential role in precision medicine for MS management.
背景:预测多发性硬化症(MS)的治疗反应和长期残疾仍然具有挑战性。在其他复杂疾病中,结合遗传风险变异可以检测与重要结果相关的相关临床内表型,但这种策略从未应用于MS。方法:我们在前瞻性威尔士MS队列(n=1455)中应用无监督分层聚类对基因组风险评分进行分析,并在死后荷兰脑库(NBB) MS (NBB-MS)队列(n=272)中重复了这一发现。使用生存分析评估疾病进展,以确定到达扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)里程碑的时间。结果:确定了三个基因组簇,每个基因组簇具有相似的遗传图谱。各组间的基线人口统计数据没有差异。第1组威尔士患者达到EDSS 6和EDSS 8的时间明显晚于第2组和第3组(分别晚6年,p=3×10-3和13年,p=0.02)。这些发现在NBB-MS队列中得到了重复(第1组比第2组延迟6年至EDSS 6, p=0.04)。基因组聚类独立预测疾病进展(hr 1.3-2.0,所有p-³),而在聚类1或3中没有观察到这种益处。在NBB-MS队列中,第2组患者也有发病较早的症状,包括吞咽困难(p=0.02)和痉挛(p=8×10- 4)。结论:遗传聚类揭示了具有不同预后和治疗反应的具有临床意义的MS亚型,突出了其在MS治疗精准医学中的潜在作用。
{"title":"Genetic subtypes associated with multiple sclerosis severity and response to treatment.","authors":"Karim L Kreft, Nienke J Mekkes, Emeka Uzochukwu, Sam Loveless, Ray Wynford-Thomas, Katharine Elizabeth Harding, Mark Wardle, Peter Holmans, J William L Brown, Michael Lawton, Emma Clare Tallantyre, Inge R Holtman, Neil P Robertson","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-337337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-337337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting response to treatment and long-term disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains challenging. In other complex diseases, combining genetic risk variants has enabled the detection of relevant clinical endophenotypes associated with important outcomes, but this strategy has never been applied to MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied unsupervised hierarchical clustering to genomic risk scores in a prospective Welsh MS cohort (n=1455) and replicated the findings in the postmortem Netherlands Brain Bank (NBB) MS (NBB-MS) cohort (n=272). Disease progression was assessed using survival analysis to determine the time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) milestones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three genomic clusters were identified, each with similar genetic profiles. Baseline demographics did not differ between clusters. Welsh patients in cluster 1 attained EDSS 6 and EDSS 8 significantly later than clusters 2 and 3 (by 6 years, p=3×10<sup>-3</sup> and 13 years, p=0.02, respectively). These findings were replicated in the NBB-MS cohort (6-year delay to EDSS 6 for cluster 1 vs 2, p=0.04). Genomic clustering independently predicted disease progression (HRs 1.3-2.0, all p<0.05), beyond established risk factors. Clusters 2 and 3 showed a greater annual increase in T2 lesion load on serial MR imaging (p=0.04). In cluster 2, patients receiving disease-modifying treatments had delayed progression to EDSS 6 (p=3×10<sup>-</sup>³), while no such benefit was observed in clusters 1 or 3. Cluster 2 patients also had earlier onset of symptoms, including dysphagia (p=0.02) and spasticity (p=8×10<sup>-</sup>⁴) in the NBB-MS cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetic clustering reveals clinically meaningful MS subtypes with distinct prognoses and treatment responses, highlighting its potential role in precision medicine for MS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2025-336093
Sofia Carozza, Amar Dhand
{"title":"Neurology of social graces in patients with language deficits.","authors":"Sofia Carozza, Amar Dhand","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-336093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-336093","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145984948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}