Information and Communications Technology-Based Monitoring Service for Tailored Chronic Disease Management in Primary Care: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on ICT-CM Trial Results.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Internet Research Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.2196/51239
Sung-Hee Oh, Jae-Heon Kang, Jin-Won Kwon
{"title":"Information and Communications Technology-Based Monitoring Service for Tailored Chronic Disease Management in Primary Care: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on ICT-CM Trial Results.","authors":"Sung-Hee Oh, Jae-Heon Kang, Jin-Won Kwon","doi":"10.2196/51239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Information and communications technology-based tailored management (TM) intervention is a novel automatic system in which a smartphone app for the management of patients with hypertension and diabetes, the provider web, and Bluetooth devices are linked. However, little evidence exists regarding the cost-effectiveness of the interventions using mobile apps.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of TM intervention for adult patients with hypertension or diabetes in primary care compared with usual care (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model was conducted from the Korean health care system perspective. Based on 6-month outcome data from an information and communications technology-based tailored chronic disease management (ICT-CM) trial, effectiveness over a lifetime beyond the trial periods was extrapolated using a cardiovascular disease risk prediction model. Costs were estimated using ICT-CM trial data and national health insurance claims data. Health utility weights were obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base-case analysis, compared with UC, TM was more costly (US $23,157 for TM vs US $22,391 for UC) and more effective (12.006 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] for TM vs 11.868 QALYs for UC). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US $5556 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of TM being cost-effective compared with UC was approximately 97% at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of US $26,515 (KRW 35 million) per QALY gained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with UC, TM intervention is a cost-effective option for patients with hypertension or diabetes in primary care settings. The study results can assist policy makers in making evidence-based decisions when implementing accessible chronic disease management services.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/51239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Information and communications technology-based tailored management (TM) intervention is a novel automatic system in which a smartphone app for the management of patients with hypertension and diabetes, the provider web, and Bluetooth devices are linked. However, little evidence exists regarding the cost-effectiveness of the interventions using mobile apps.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of TM intervention for adult patients with hypertension or diabetes in primary care compared with usual care (UC).

Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model was conducted from the Korean health care system perspective. Based on 6-month outcome data from an information and communications technology-based tailored chronic disease management (ICT-CM) trial, effectiveness over a lifetime beyond the trial periods was extrapolated using a cardiovascular disease risk prediction model. Costs were estimated using ICT-CM trial data and national health insurance claims data. Health utility weights were obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Results: In the base-case analysis, compared with UC, TM was more costly (US $23,157 for TM vs US $22,391 for UC) and more effective (12.006 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] for TM vs 11.868 QALYs for UC). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US $5556 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of TM being cost-effective compared with UC was approximately 97% at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of US $26,515 (KRW 35 million) per QALY gained.

Conclusions: Compared with UC, TM intervention is a cost-effective option for patients with hypertension or diabetes in primary care settings. The study results can assist policy makers in making evidence-based decisions when implementing accessible chronic disease management services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于信息和通信技术的监测服务,为基层医疗机构量身定制慢性病管理方案:基于 ICT-CM 试验结果的成本效益分析。
背景:基于信息和通信技术的量身定制管理(TM)干预是一种新型的自动系统,它将用于管理高血压和糖尿病患者的智能手机应用程序、医疗服务提供者网站和蓝牙设备连接起来。然而,关于使用移动应用程序进行干预的成本效益的证据却很少:本研究旨在评估针对初级保健中高血压或糖尿病成年患者的 TM 干预与常规保健(UC)相比的成本效益:方法:从韩国医疗保健系统的角度,使用马尔可夫模型进行成本效益分析。根据基于信息和通信技术的定制慢性病管理(ICT-CM)试验的 6 个月结果数据,使用心血管疾病风险预测模型推断试验期后的终生疗效。成本估算采用了 ICT-CM 试验数据和全国医疗保险理赔数据。健康效用权重来自韩国国民健康与营养调查:在基础案例分析中,与 UC 相比,TM 的成本更高(TM 为 23,157 美元,UC 为 22,391 美元),效果更好(TM 为 12.006 质量调整生命年,UC 为 11.868 质量调整生命年)。每获得 1 QALY 的增量成本效益比为 5556 美元。概率敏感性分析表明,在每 QALY 收益的增量成本效益比阈值为 26,515 美元(3,500 万韩元)时,TM 与 UC 相比具有成本效益的概率约为 97%:与 UC 相比,TM 干预对初级医疗机构的高血压或糖尿病患者来说是一种具有成本效益的选择。研究结果有助于政策制定者在实施无障碍慢性病管理服务时做出循证决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the "Zindagi Mehfooz" Electronic Immunization Registry and Suite of Digital Health Interventions to Improve the Coverage and Timeliness of Immunization Services in Sindh, Pakistan: Mixed Methods Study. Hospital Is Not the Home: Lessons From Implementing Remote Technology to Support Acute Inpatient and Transitional Care in the Home in the United States and United Kingdom. Exploring Public Emotions on Obesity During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling: Cross-Sectional Study. Information and Communications Technology-Based Monitoring Service for Tailored Chronic Disease Management in Primary Care: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on ICT-CM Trial Results. Using Social Media to Recruit Participants in Health Care Research: Case Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1