Pain, Physical Activity, Kinesiophobia, Balance and Fall Risk in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.09.007
Çağla Özdemir, Hilal Telli
{"title":"Pain, Physical Activity, Kinesiophobia, Balance and Fall Risk in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy.","authors":"Çağla Özdemir, Hilal Telli","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk of balance disorders and falls in patients with diabetic neuropathic pain and the associated kinesiophobia and physical limitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a cross-sectional descriptive study and was conducted with 250 patients seen in Family Medicine outpatient clinics between February and March 2023. The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) was used to measure the patients' fear of movement/reinjury, the International Fall Efficacy Scale (FES-I) was used to measure the level of fear of falling, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to assess balance status, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to assess all activities during the day. Patients were divided into three groups according to pain patterns: Neuropathic pain (N = 74), nociceptive/mechanical pain (N = 96), and control group (no pain) (N = 90). In statistical analyses, p < .05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 62.56 ± 9.81 years in the neuropathic pain group, 62.47 ± 11.67 years in the nociceptive/mechanical pain group, and 60.87 ± 10.99 years in the control group. Overall, 60% of the participants were women. In intergroup analyses, there were significant differences between the groups in terms of TSK (p = .012), FES-I (p < .001), IPAQ (p < .001), and BBS (p < .001). The neuropathic pain group had the lowest BBS scores. When comparing the neuropathic pain group to the control group, TSK was significantly higher (p = .009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with neuropathic pain due to diabetes mellitus are more likely to have increased balance impairment, leading to decreased physical activity and an increased risk of falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.09.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk of balance disorders and falls in patients with diabetic neuropathic pain and the associated kinesiophobia and physical limitation.

Methods: This study was designed as a cross-sectional descriptive study and was conducted with 250 patients seen in Family Medicine outpatient clinics between February and March 2023. The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) was used to measure the patients' fear of movement/reinjury, the International Fall Efficacy Scale (FES-I) was used to measure the level of fear of falling, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to assess balance status, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to assess all activities during the day. Patients were divided into three groups according to pain patterns: Neuropathic pain (N = 74), nociceptive/mechanical pain (N = 96), and control group (no pain) (N = 90). In statistical analyses, p < .05 was considered significant.

Results: The mean age was 62.56 ± 9.81 years in the neuropathic pain group, 62.47 ± 11.67 years in the nociceptive/mechanical pain group, and 60.87 ± 10.99 years in the control group. Overall, 60% of the participants were women. In intergroup analyses, there were significant differences between the groups in terms of TSK (p = .012), FES-I (p < .001), IPAQ (p < .001), and BBS (p < .001). The neuropathic pain group had the lowest BBS scores. When comparing the neuropathic pain group to the control group, TSK was significantly higher (p = .009).

Conclusions: Patients with neuropathic pain due to diabetes mellitus are more likely to have increased balance impairment, leading to decreased physical activity and an increased risk of falls.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病神经病变患者的疼痛、体力活动、运动恐惧症、平衡能力和跌倒风险。
目的:本研究旨在调查糖尿病神经病理性疼痛患者发生平衡障碍和跌倒的风险,以及与之相关的运动恐惧和身体限制:本研究为横断面描述性研究,在 2023 年 2 月至 3 月期间对 250 名在全科门诊就诊的患者进行了调查。坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK)用于测量患者对运动/再损伤的恐惧程度,国际跌倒效能量表(FES-I)用于测量患者对跌倒的恐惧程度,伯格平衡量表(BBS)用于评估患者的平衡状态,国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)用于评估患者白天的所有活动。根据疼痛模式将患者分为三组:神经性疼痛组(74 人)、痛觉/机械性疼痛组(96 人)和对照组(无痛)(90 人)。在统计分析中,P < .05 为差异显著:神经病理性疼痛组的平均年龄为(62.56 ± 9.81)岁,痛觉/机械性疼痛组为(62.47 ± 11.67)岁,对照组为(60.87 ± 10.99)岁。总体而言,60%的参与者为女性。在组间分析中,两组在 TSK(p = .012)、FES-I(p < .001)、IPAQ(p < .001)和 BBS(p < .001)方面存在显著差异。神经性疼痛组的 BBS 得分最低。神经病理性疼痛组与对照组相比,TSK明显更高(p = .009):结论:糖尿病导致的神经性疼痛患者更有可能增加平衡障碍,从而导致体力活动减少和跌倒风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management. Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement. Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Labor Pain: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1