Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Patients With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2025.02.010
Vincenzo Damico RN, PhD , Margherita Milani RN , Liana Murano RN, MSN
{"title":"Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Patients With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Vincenzo Damico RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Margherita Milani RN ,&nbsp;Liana Murano RN, MSN","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chronic pain management includes treatment with the use of opioids, electrical stimulation and acupuncture. However, traditional understanding of chronic pain has recently been challenged in light of evidence supporting a key role of psycho-social factors and central sensitization in this population. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), focuses on increasing awareness and acceptance of moment-to-moment experiences including difficult emotions and physical discomfort.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the effects of a MBSR on chronic pain patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A two-arm, blinding randomized controlled clinical trial with repeated-measures design.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>One pain management clinic in a general hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Chronic pain patients (N = 149 patients).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>The patients were randomly allocated to either psychoeducation<span><span> (intervention group) or usual care (control group) (N = 75 vs 74 patients per group). The randomization was minimized, taking into account the imbalance between the groups over a number of prognostic clinical and demographic factors. The intervention included an 8-week MBSR<span> program (2 hours per week) in a group format and the MBSR program was performed 2 times (1-2 months after enrollment and 7-8 months after enrollment). Study outcomes included Chronic pain (pain intensity and pain interference) assessed with Brief Pain Inventory (primary outcomes), and other secondary outcomes (i.e., </span></span>quality of life, adherence to the intervention, mindfulness and self-awareness and drug assumption). We examined the differences at baseline (clinical-demographic data collected at enrollment), at 6 (T</span></span><sub>1</sub>) and 13 months (T<sub>2</sub>) between the intervention and control groups by means of chi-square and independent samples <em>t</em> tests. Normally distributed measurement data were represented by means and standard deviations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants in the intervention group revealed significantly greater reductions on impact of chronic pain in terms of pain intensity (worst pain in the last 24 hours, <em>p</em> &lt; .001; pain right now, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and in terms of pain interference (interference with mood, <em>p</em> = .002; interference with normal work, <em>p</em> = .043; interference with relationship with other people, <em>p</em> = .036) at T<sub>1,</sub> and in terms of pain intensity (worst pain in the last 24 hours, <em>p</em> &lt; .001; pain on average, <em>p</em> =. 013; pain right now, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and in terms of pain interference (interference with mood, <em>p</em> &lt; .001; Interference with sleep, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) at T<sub>2</sub>. A significant difference emerged in the perceived quality of life, between two groups at T<sub>2</sub> (55.9 vs 58.7, <em>t</em><sub>(133)</sub> = - 2.053, <em>p</em> = .044).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study added values on the benefits of patients-focused MBSR to treatment of chronic pain. Future research can evaluate its long-term effects for patients of chronic pain with diverse socio-demographic and pain-related characteristics in a greater sample.</div><div>Registration: Italian Clinical Trial Registry (NCT05843409). Recruitment: April 2023 to April 2024.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 5","pages":"Pages 510-522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904225001225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chronic pain management includes treatment with the use of opioids, electrical stimulation and acupuncture. However, traditional understanding of chronic pain has recently been challenged in light of evidence supporting a key role of psycho-social factors and central sensitization in this population. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), focuses on increasing awareness and acceptance of moment-to-moment experiences including difficult emotions and physical discomfort.

Objective

To examine the effects of a MBSR on chronic pain patients.

Design

A two-arm, blinding randomized controlled clinical trial with repeated-measures design.

Setting

One pain management clinic in a general hospital.

Participants

Chronic pain patients (N = 149 patients).

Methods

The patients were randomly allocated to either psychoeducation (intervention group) or usual care (control group) (N = 75 vs 74 patients per group). The randomization was minimized, taking into account the imbalance between the groups over a number of prognostic clinical and demographic factors. The intervention included an 8-week MBSR program (2 hours per week) in a group format and the MBSR program was performed 2 times (1-2 months after enrollment and 7-8 months after enrollment). Study outcomes included Chronic pain (pain intensity and pain interference) assessed with Brief Pain Inventory (primary outcomes), and other secondary outcomes (i.e., quality of life, adherence to the intervention, mindfulness and self-awareness and drug assumption). We examined the differences at baseline (clinical-demographic data collected at enrollment), at 6 (T1) and 13 months (T2) between the intervention and control groups by means of chi-square and independent samples t tests. Normally distributed measurement data were represented by means and standard deviations.

Results

Participants in the intervention group revealed significantly greater reductions on impact of chronic pain in terms of pain intensity (worst pain in the last 24 hours, p < .001; pain right now, p < .001) and in terms of pain interference (interference with mood, p = .002; interference with normal work, p = .043; interference with relationship with other people, p = .036) at T1, and in terms of pain intensity (worst pain in the last 24 hours, p < .001; pain on average, p =. 013; pain right now, p < .001) and in terms of pain interference (interference with mood, p < .001; Interference with sleep, p < .001) at T2. A significant difference emerged in the perceived quality of life, between two groups at T2 (55.9 vs 58.7, t(133) = - 2.053, p = .044).

Conclusions

Our study added values on the benefits of patients-focused MBSR to treatment of chronic pain. Future research can evaluate its long-term effects for patients of chronic pain with diverse socio-demographic and pain-related characteristics in a greater sample.
Registration: Italian Clinical Trial Registry (NCT05843409). Recruitment: April 2023 to April 2024.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念减压法对慢性疼痛患者的影响:随机对照试验。
背景:慢性疼痛管理包括使用阿片类药物、电刺激和针灸治疗。然而,对于慢性疼痛的传统理解最近受到了挑战,因为有证据支持心理社会因素和中枢敏化在这一人群中的关键作用。正念减压法(MBSR),专注于提高意识和接受当下的经历,包括困难的情绪和身体上的不适。目的:探讨正念减压疗法对慢性疼痛患者的治疗效果。设计:采用重复测量设计的双臂、盲法随机对照临床试验。地点:一所综合性医院的疼痛管理诊所。参与者:慢性疼痛患者(149例)。方法:将患者随机分为心理教育组(干预组)和常规护理组(对照组)(N = 75 vs 74 /组)。考虑到两组之间在一些预后临床和人口统计学因素上的不平衡,将随机化最小化。干预包括8周的正念减压计划(每周2小时),以小组形式进行,并进行2次正念减压计划(入组后1-2个月和入组后7-8个月)。研究结果包括慢性疼痛(疼痛强度和疼痛干扰)评估的简要疼痛量表(主要结果),以及其他次要结果(即生活质量,坚持干预,正念和自我意识和药物假设)。我们通过卡方检验和独立样本t检验检验了干预组和对照组在基线(入组时收集的临床人口学数据)、6个月(T1)和13个月(T2)时的差异。正态分布的测量数据用均值和标准差表示。结果:干预组的参与者在疼痛强度方面显示出更大的慢性疼痛影响的降低(最近24小时的最严重疼痛,p < 0.001;现在的疼痛,p < 0.001)和疼痛干扰方面(对情绪的干扰,p = 0.002;干扰正常工作,p = 0.043;与他人关系的干扰,p = 0.036),在疼痛强度方面(最近24小时最痛,p < 0.001;平均疼痛,p =。013年;现在的疼痛,p < 0.001)以及疼痛干扰方面(对情绪的干扰,p < 0.001;T2时干扰睡眠,p < 0.001)。两组患者在T2时的感知生活质量有显著差异(55.9 vs 58.7, t(133) = - 2.053, p = 0.044)。结论:我们的研究增加了以患者为中心的正念减压治疗慢性疼痛的益处。未来的研究可以在更大的样本中评估其对具有不同社会人口统计学和疼痛相关特征的慢性疼痛患者的长期影响。注册:意大利临床试验注册中心(NCT05843409)。招聘时间:2023年4月至2024年4月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Table of contents Neuropathic Pain Experience and Self-Management Strategies of Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Managing Allodynia in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: An Integrated Rehabilitation Approach A Randomized Trial of Cervical Stabilization Exercise Training Via Telerehabilitation for Migraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1