Reclassification of items in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire: Correlation analysis

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory investigation Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2024.09.017
Jieun Kang , Ji-Yong Moon , Deog Kyeom Kim , Jin Woo Kim , Seung Hun Jang , Jae-Woo Kwon , Byung-Jae Lee , Hyeon-Kyoung Koo
{"title":"Reclassification of items in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire: Correlation analysis","authors":"Jieun Kang ,&nbsp;Ji-Yong Moon ,&nbsp;Deog Kyeom Kim ,&nbsp;Jin Woo Kim ,&nbsp;Seung Hun Jang ,&nbsp;Jae-Woo Kwon ,&nbsp;Byung-Jae Lee ,&nbsp;Hyeon-Kyoung Koo","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a validated tool for assessing cough that has three domains (physical, psychological, and social), with eight, seven, and four items, respectively. However, the assigned domain may not accurately reflect the characteristics of an item. This study aimed to reclassify the items in the Korean version of the LCQ (K-LCQ) to improve the coherence in each domain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data of patients with chronic cough from 16 centers who completed the K-LCQ were retrospectively analyzed. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to assess the correlations between items and their domains. Principal component analysis was performed to recategorize the K-LCQ items.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The correlation analysis of the data from 255 patients demonstrated that certain items such as tiredness, embarrassment, and interference with daily work or overall life enjoyment showed strong or very strong correlations with all three domains. Cough bout frequency showed the weakest correlation with the physical domain, despite being included in that domain, and had stronger correlations with the psychological and social domain. The principal component analysis led to the reclassification of six items: one from the physical to psychological, two from the social to psychological, and three from the psychological to social domain. The within-domain correlation coherence was higher in the new classification than in the original. Validation using an independent cohort of 203 patients yielded similar results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The new classification of the K-LCQ items showed improved within-domain correlation coherence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":"62 6","pages":"Pages 1150-1156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524001564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a validated tool for assessing cough that has three domains (physical, psychological, and social), with eight, seven, and four items, respectively. However, the assigned domain may not accurately reflect the characteristics of an item. This study aimed to reclassify the items in the Korean version of the LCQ (K-LCQ) to improve the coherence in each domain.

Methods

Data of patients with chronic cough from 16 centers who completed the K-LCQ were retrospectively analyzed. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to assess the correlations between items and their domains. Principal component analysis was performed to recategorize the K-LCQ items.

Results

The correlation analysis of the data from 255 patients demonstrated that certain items such as tiredness, embarrassment, and interference with daily work or overall life enjoyment showed strong or very strong correlations with all three domains. Cough bout frequency showed the weakest correlation with the physical domain, despite being included in that domain, and had stronger correlations with the psychological and social domain. The principal component analysis led to the reclassification of six items: one from the physical to psychological, two from the social to psychological, and three from the psychological to social domain. The within-domain correlation coherence was higher in the new classification than in the original. Validation using an independent cohort of 203 patients yielded similar results.

Conclusions

The new classification of the K-LCQ items showed improved within-domain correlation coherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莱斯特咳嗽问卷项目的重新分类:相关性分析
背景:莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)是一种经过验证的评估咳嗽的工具,它有三个领域(生理、心理和社会),分别有 8 个、7 个和 4 个项目。然而,指定的领域可能无法准确反映项目的特征。本研究旨在对韩国版 LCQ(K-LCQ)中的项目进行重新分类,以提高各领域的一致性:方法:回顾性分析了 16 个中心完成 K-LCQ 的慢性咳嗽患者数据。斯皮尔曼等级相关分析用于评估项目及其领域之间的相关性。对K-LCQ项目进行主成分分析以重新分类:对 255 名患者的数据进行的相关性分析表明,某些项目,如疲倦、尴尬、对日常工作或整体生活享受的干扰,与所有三个领域都有很强或非常强的相关性。咳嗽发作频率与生理领域的相关性最弱,尽管它也包含在生理领域中,但与心理和社会领域的相关性较强。通过主成分分析,对六个项目进行了重新分类:一个项目从生理领域归入心理领域,两个项目从社会领域归入心理领域,三个项目从心理领域归入社会领域。与原来的分类相比,新分类的域内相关一致性更高。使用独立的203名患者进行验证也得出了类似的结果:结论:K-LCQ项目的新分类显示出更高的域内相关一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Persistent COVID-19 improved with immunoglobulin replacement therapy in Good's syndrome Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for MPO-ANCA positive interstitial lung disease: A comparative study of ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV)-ILD and pulmonary limited vasculitis Association of constipation with the survival of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias A protocol for a Japanese prospective cohort evaluating the features of patients with uncontrolled asthma achieving clinical remission: J-CIRCLE Viability and diagnostic potential of tissues obtained through cryobiopsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1