Radiation Therapy Dose for Limited-stage Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphomas of the Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissues of the Stomach: A Meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Practical Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.008
Song Heui Cho, Kyung-Sook Yang, Ka-Won Kang, Nam Kwon Lee
{"title":"Radiation Therapy Dose for Limited-stage Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphomas of the Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissues of the Stomach: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Song Heui Cho, Kyung-Sook Yang, Ka-Won Kang, Nam Kwon Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of 2 standard radiation therapy (RT) doses for limited-stage gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A database search was performed to identify articles published from database inception to August 31, 2023. Based on the current standard dose of 24.0 to 30.0 Gy, doses of approximately 30.0 Gy were classified as standard dose (SD), while those of approximately 24.0 Gy were classified as low dose (LD). Pooled estimates of the complete remission (CR) and local recurrence (LR) rates were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1072 patients across 30 included studies were analyzed. SD was used in 28 studies (n = 987), while LD was used in 6 studies (n = 85), and both regimens were used in 4 studies. In all included studies, the CR rate was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), and the LR rate was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.04-0.06), showing no significant between-study heterogeneity (τ<sup>2</sup> = 0 and I<sup>2</sup> = 0% for both; P = .8447 and .9998, respectively). SD and LD resulted in no significant differences in the CR rates (0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] vs 0.96 [95% CI, 0.89-0.99]; P = .9174) or LR rates (0.05 [95% CI, 0.04-0.06] vs 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.10]; P = .5495).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the SD and LD groups achieved excellent CR and LR rates. These results indicate that the RT dose for limited-stage gastric EMZL may be safely de-escalated without compromising local tumor control.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of 2 standard radiation therapy (RT) doses for limited-stage gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues.

Methods and materials: A database search was performed to identify articles published from database inception to August 31, 2023. Based on the current standard dose of 24.0 to 30.0 Gy, doses of approximately 30.0 Gy were classified as standard dose (SD), while those of approximately 24.0 Gy were classified as low dose (LD). Pooled estimates of the complete remission (CR) and local recurrence (LR) rates were calculated and compared.

Results: Data from 1072 patients across 30 included studies were analyzed. SD was used in 28 studies (n = 987), while LD was used in 6 studies (n = 85), and both regimens were used in 4 studies. In all included studies, the CR rate was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), and the LR rate was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.04-0.06), showing no significant between-study heterogeneity (τ2 = 0 and I2 = 0% for both; P = .8447 and .9998, respectively). SD and LD resulted in no significant differences in the CR rates (0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] vs 0.96 [95% CI, 0.89-0.99]; P = .9174) or LR rates (0.05 [95% CI, 0.04-0.06] vs 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.10]; P = .5495).

Conclusions: Both the SD and LD groups achieved excellent CR and LR rates. These results indicate that the RT dose for limited-stage gastric EMZL may be safely de-escalated without compromising local tumor control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃黏膜相关淋巴组织局限期边缘区淋巴瘤的放射治疗剂量:Meta分析:胃EMZL的RT剂量。
目的:比较两种标准放射治疗(RT)剂量对胃黏膜相关淋巴组织局限期结节外边缘区淋巴瘤(EMZL)的疗效:通过数据库检索,找出从数据库建立到2023年8月31日期间发表的文章。根据目前24.0-30.0 Gy的标准剂量,约30.0 Gy的剂量被归类为标准剂量(SD),而约24.0 Gy的剂量被归类为低剂量(LD)。计算并比较了完全缓解率(CR)和局部复发率(LR)的汇总估计值:分析了 30 项纳入研究的 1,072 名患者的数据。28项研究(n = 987)使用了SD方案,6项研究(n = 85)使用了LD方案,4项研究同时使用了两种方案。在所有纳入的研究中,CR 率为 0.96(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.94-0.97),LR 率为 0.05(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.04-0.06),研究间无显著异质性(两者的 τ2 = 0 和 I2 = 0%;P 分别为 0.8447 和 0.9998)。SD组和LD组的CR率(0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] vs. 0.96 [95% CI, 0.89-0.99]; P = 0.9174)或LR率(0.05 [95% CI, 0.04-0.06] vs. 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.10]; P = 0.5495)无明显差异:结论:SD组和LD组的CR和LR率都很高。这些结果表明,在不影响局部肿瘤控制的情况下,可以安全地降低局限期胃EMZL的RT剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
期刊最新文献
Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Table of Contents Editorial Board Being an Oncologist—How I Evolved Order From Chaos: The Benefits of Standardized Nomenclature in Radiation Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1