Song Heui Cho, Kyung-Sook Yang, Ka-Won Kang, Nam Kwon Lee
{"title":"Radiation Therapy Dose for Limited-stage Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphomas of the Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissues of the Stomach: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Song Heui Cho, Kyung-Sook Yang, Ka-Won Kang, Nam Kwon Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of 2 standard radiation therapy (RT) doses for limited-stage gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A database search was performed to identify articles published from database inception to August 31, 2023. Based on the current standard dose of 24.0 to 30.0 Gy, doses of approximately 30.0 Gy were classified as standard dose (SD), while those of approximately 24.0 Gy were classified as low dose (LD). Pooled estimates of the complete remission (CR) and local recurrence (LR) rates were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1072 patients across 30 included studies were analyzed. SD was used in 28 studies (n = 987), while LD was used in 6 studies (n = 85), and both regimens were used in 4 studies. In all included studies, the CR rate was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), and the LR rate was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.04-0.06), showing no significant between-study heterogeneity (τ<sup>2</sup> = 0 and I<sup>2</sup> = 0% for both; P = .8447 and .9998, respectively). SD and LD resulted in no significant differences in the CR rates (0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] vs 0.96 [95% CI, 0.89-0.99]; P = .9174) or LR rates (0.05 [95% CI, 0.04-0.06] vs 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.10]; P = .5495).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the SD and LD groups achieved excellent CR and LR rates. These results indicate that the RT dose for limited-stage gastric EMZL may be safely de-escalated without compromising local tumor control.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.09.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of 2 standard radiation therapy (RT) doses for limited-stage gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues.
Methods and materials: A database search was performed to identify articles published from database inception to August 31, 2023. Based on the current standard dose of 24.0 to 30.0 Gy, doses of approximately 30.0 Gy were classified as standard dose (SD), while those of approximately 24.0 Gy were classified as low dose (LD). Pooled estimates of the complete remission (CR) and local recurrence (LR) rates were calculated and compared.
Results: Data from 1072 patients across 30 included studies were analyzed. SD was used in 28 studies (n = 987), while LD was used in 6 studies (n = 85), and both regimens were used in 4 studies. In all included studies, the CR rate was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), and the LR rate was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.04-0.06), showing no significant between-study heterogeneity (τ2 = 0 and I2 = 0% for both; P = .8447 and .9998, respectively). SD and LD resulted in no significant differences in the CR rates (0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] vs 0.96 [95% CI, 0.89-0.99]; P = .9174) or LR rates (0.05 [95% CI, 0.04-0.06] vs 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.10]; P = .5495).
Conclusions: Both the SD and LD groups achieved excellent CR and LR rates. These results indicate that the RT dose for limited-stage gastric EMZL may be safely de-escalated without compromising local tumor control.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.