No Significant Difference between Suture Button and Hook Plate in Treating Acute Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review.

Chengxin Xie, Zhenghua Hong, Yongwei Su, Jiao Jiang, Hua Luo
{"title":"No Significant Difference between Suture Button and Hook Plate in Treating Acute Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Chengxin Xie, Zhenghua Hong, Yongwei Su, Jiao Jiang, Hua Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of the suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixations for treating acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search based on the preferred reporting items from systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing SB and HP in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS), coracoclavicular distance, operation time, and occurrence of complications were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools and the ROBINS-I tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies were included, consisting of two RCTs and 14 non-RCTs, with 471 patients in the SB group and 445 patients in the HP group. Among the included studies that reported patient-reported outcomes, four study indicated significantly higher Constant score in the SB group compared to the HP group, while the remaining five studies found no difference between the groups. Among the five included studies that reported VAS scores, two showed statistically significant differences favoring SB. Among 10 included studies reported operation time, three demonstrated shorter operation time for SB compared to HP, while two indicated longer operation time for SB surgery compared to HP. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rates of coracoclavicular distance and complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence suggests no clear clinical superiority of SB over HP in treating acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocations. While some studies show SB may offer benefits like higher constant score and lower VAS scores, most outcomes reveal no significant differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of the suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixations for treating acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation.

Methods: Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search based on the preferred reporting items from systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies comparing SB and HP in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS), coracoclavicular distance, operation time, and occurrence of complications were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tools and the ROBINS-I tool.

Results: A total of 16 studies were included, consisting of two RCTs and 14 non-RCTs, with 471 patients in the SB group and 445 patients in the HP group. Among the included studies that reported patient-reported outcomes, four study indicated significantly higher Constant score in the SB group compared to the HP group, while the remaining five studies found no difference between the groups. Among the five included studies that reported VAS scores, two showed statistically significant differences favoring SB. Among 10 included studies reported operation time, three demonstrated shorter operation time for SB compared to HP, while two indicated longer operation time for SB surgery compared to HP. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rates of coracoclavicular distance and complications between the two groups.

Conclusions: The evidence suggests no clear clinical superiority of SB over HP in treating acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocations. While some studies show SB may offer benefits like higher constant score and lower VAS scores, most outcomes reveal no significant differences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缝合扣与钩状钢板在治疗急性洛克伍德 III 型肩锁关节脱位方面无显著差异:系统回顾
目的:本研究旨在系统回顾现有证据,比较缝合扣(SB)与钩板(HP)固定治疗急性Rockwood III型肩锁关节(ACJ)脱位的疗效差异:两名审稿人根据系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目独立进行了文献检索。在PubMed、EMBASE、Medline和Cochrane图书馆中系统检索了比较SB和HP治疗急性Rockwood III型ACJ脱位的研究。对恒定评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、锁骨间距、手术时间和并发症发生情况进行了评估。采用 Cochrane 协作工具和 ROBINS-I 工具评估偏倚风险:共纳入了 16 项研究,包括 2 项 RCT 和 14 项非 RCT,其中 SB 组有 471 名患者,HP 组有 445 名患者。在纳入的报告患者报告结果的研究中,4 项研究表明 SB 组的 Constant 得分明显高于 HP 组,而其余 5 项研究发现两组之间没有差异。在纳入的 5 项报告 VAS 评分的研究中,有 2 项研究显示 SB 组的差异具有统计学意义。在 10 项报告手术时间的纳入研究中,有 3 项研究表明 SB 手术的手术时间比 HP 短,有 2 项研究表明 SB 手术的手术时间比 HP 长。然而,两组患者的锁骨间距和并发症发生率在统计学上并无显著差异:有证据表明,在治疗急性Rockwood III型交叉肘关节脱位方面,SB手术在临床上并没有明显优于HP手术。虽然一些研究显示 SB 可提供更高的恒定评分和更低的 VAS 评分等益处,但大多数结果显示并无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Author Reply to Editorial Comment "Autologous Minced Repair of Knee Cartilage Is Safely and Effectively Performed Using Arthroscopic Techniques". Culture Expansion Alters Human Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Production of Osteoarthritis-relevant Cytokines and Growth Factors. Steeper Slope of the Medial Tibial Plateau, Greater Varus Alignment, and Narrower Intercondylar Distance and Notch Width Increase Risk for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review. Synthetic Medial Meniscus Implant Demonstrates High Reoperation Rates: Patients Who Retain Implant or Require Implant Exchange SHow Improvement For Post Meniscectomy Knee Pain Is Associated With Clinical Improvement But High Reoperation Rates At 2-Years Post-Operatively. The Knee Anterolateral Ligament is Present in 82% of North American and 65% of European But Only in 46% of Asian Studies: A Systematic Review of Frequency and Anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1