Assessing Personality Risk Profiles in Prosthodontics Patients: A Delphi-Driven Classification Approach.

Jorge Jofré, Ricardo Cartes-Velasquez, Josephine Scott, Claudia Asenjo-Lobos
{"title":"Assessing Personality Risk Profiles in Prosthodontics Patients: A Delphi-Driven Classification Approach.","authors":"Jorge Jofré, Ricardo Cartes-Velasquez, Josephine Scott, Claudia Asenjo-Lobos","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify specific personality traits that could potentially undermine the overall satisfaction of the patient with the prosthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to identify the personality traits (PTs) relevant to patients requiring dental treatment. Later, a Delphi process was employed to classify the selected PTs into their levels of risk to prosthodontic treatment satisfaction, ultimately leading to the development of a personality risk profile (PRP) proposal. The expert panel consisted of specialists with over 10 years of practice experience. The Delphi process involved three rounds of evaluation and consensus building.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 26 PTs associated with dental treatment satisfaction were identified. Following the three rounds of the Delphi method, a consensus was achieved, resulting in the classification of these PTs into three PRPs, as follows: low risk (Cooperative, Understanding, Compliant, Trusting, Concerned about their health, Willing, Grateful, and Responsible); moderate risk (Insecure, Overinformed, Demanding, Appearance-obsessed, and Pessimistic); and high risk (Mistrustful, Skeptical, Unwilling, Defiant attitude, Unrealistic expectations, Neglectful, Treatment-resistant, Patient speaks. negatively about other dentists, Violent, Irresponsible, Idealize the dentist, and Controller).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified and categorized PTs that have the potential to adversely impact prosthodontic treatment satisfaction. Through this PRP proposal, dental professionals can recognize these patients before initiating prosthodontic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify specific personality traits that could potentially undermine the overall satisfaction of the patient with the prosthodontic treatment.

Materials and methods: A literature review was conducted to identify the personality traits (PTs) relevant to patients requiring dental treatment. Later, a Delphi process was employed to classify the selected PTs into their levels of risk to prosthodontic treatment satisfaction, ultimately leading to the development of a personality risk profile (PRP) proposal. The expert panel consisted of specialists with over 10 years of practice experience. The Delphi process involved three rounds of evaluation and consensus building.

Results: In total, 26 PTs associated with dental treatment satisfaction were identified. Following the three rounds of the Delphi method, a consensus was achieved, resulting in the classification of these PTs into three PRPs, as follows: low risk (Cooperative, Understanding, Compliant, Trusting, Concerned about their health, Willing, Grateful, and Responsible); moderate risk (Insecure, Overinformed, Demanding, Appearance-obsessed, and Pessimistic); and high risk (Mistrustful, Skeptical, Unwilling, Defiant attitude, Unrealistic expectations, Neglectful, Treatment-resistant, Patient speaks. negatively about other dentists, Violent, Irresponsible, Idealize the dentist, and Controller).

Conclusions: This study identified and categorized PTs that have the potential to adversely impact prosthodontic treatment satisfaction. Through this PRP proposal, dental professionals can recognize these patients before initiating prosthodontic interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估口腔修复患者的人格风险特征:德尔菲驱动的分类方法。
目的:本文旨在确定可能会影响患者对修复治疗总体满意度的特定人格特质:通过文献综述确定了与需要牙科治疗的患者相关的人格特质(PT)。随后,采用德尔菲法将所选的人格特质划分为影响修复治疗满意度的风险等级,最终提出了人格风险特征(PRP)建议。专家小组由从业十年以上的专家组成。德尔菲过程包括三轮评估和建立共识:结果:确定了 26 个与牙科治疗满意度相关的 PT。经过三轮德尔菲法之后,达成了一致意见,将这些患者分为以下三种 PRP:低风险(合作、理解、顺从、信任、关心自己的健康、愿意、感恩和负责任)、中度风险(缺乏安全感、过度知情、要求、外表至上和悲观)和高风险(不信任、怀疑、不愿意、蔑视态度、不切实际的期望、忽视、抗拒治疗、患者对其他牙医的负面评价、暴力、不负责任、理想化牙医和控制者):本研究发现了可能对修复治疗满意度产生负面影响的潜在患者因素,并对其进行了分类。通过这一 PRP 建议,牙科专业人员可以在开始义齿修复干预之前识别出这些患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electrochemical Corrosion Behavior of Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium Alloys Fabricated by Casting, Milling, and Laser Sintering in Acidic and Neutral Media. Jaw Motion Tracking Systems in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2005 to 2025. Mouth Opening at Molar Regions: Clinical Assessment of the Accessibility in the Posterior Dental Area - A Cross-Sectional Study. The Correlation Between Patients' Satisfaction and the Quality of Porcelain Fused to Metal and All Ceramic Restorations. Cross Sectional Study. Shade Variation Influences Color Mismatch in CAD-CAM Lithium Disilicate Crowns Relative to Corresponding Shade Guide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1