{"title":"Assessing Personality Risks profile in Prosthodontics Patients: A Delphi-Driven Classification Approach.","authors":"Jorge Jofré, Ricardo Cartes-Velasquez, Josephine Scott, Claudia Asenjo-Lobos","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper aims to identify specific personality traits that could potentially undermine the overall satisfaction of the patient with the prosthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to identify the personality traits (PT) relevant to patients requiring dental treatment. Later, a Delphi process was employed to classify the selected PT into risk levels to prosthodontic treatment satisfaction, ultimately leading to the development of a personality risk profile (PRP) proposal. The expert panel consisted of specialists with over ten years of practice. The Delphi process involved three rounds of evaluation and consensus building.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six PT associated with dental treatment satisfaction were identified. Following the three rounds of the Delphi method, a consensus was achieved, resulting in the classification of these PT into three PRP, as follows: Low Risk (cooperative, understanding, compliant, trusting, concerned about their health, willing, thankful, and responsible), Moderate Risk (Insecure, Over-informed, Demanding, Appearance-obsessed, and Pessimistic), and High Risk (mistrustful, skeptical, unwilling, defiant attitude, unrealistic expectations, neglectful, treatment resistant, patient refers negatively about other dentists, violent, irresponsible, idealise the dentist, and controller).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified and categorized PT that have the potential to adversely impact prosthodontics treatment satisfaction. Through this PRP proposal, dental professionals can recognize these patients before initiating prosthodontic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to identify specific personality traits that could potentially undermine the overall satisfaction of the patient with the prosthodontic treatment.
Materials and methods: A literature review was conducted to identify the personality traits (PT) relevant to patients requiring dental treatment. Later, a Delphi process was employed to classify the selected PT into risk levels to prosthodontic treatment satisfaction, ultimately leading to the development of a personality risk profile (PRP) proposal. The expert panel consisted of specialists with over ten years of practice. The Delphi process involved three rounds of evaluation and consensus building.
Results: Twenty-six PT associated with dental treatment satisfaction were identified. Following the three rounds of the Delphi method, a consensus was achieved, resulting in the classification of these PT into three PRP, as follows: Low Risk (cooperative, understanding, compliant, trusting, concerned about their health, willing, thankful, and responsible), Moderate Risk (Insecure, Over-informed, Demanding, Appearance-obsessed, and Pessimistic), and High Risk (mistrustful, skeptical, unwilling, defiant attitude, unrealistic expectations, neglectful, treatment resistant, patient refers negatively about other dentists, violent, irresponsible, idealise the dentist, and controller).
Conclusions: This study identified and categorized PT that have the potential to adversely impact prosthodontics treatment satisfaction. Through this PRP proposal, dental professionals can recognize these patients before initiating prosthodontic interventions.