The Effect of Build Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed Custom Tray Resin Specimens.

Fatma Uslu Kavrama, Nazli Aydin, Halit Yosuncigir, Yurdanur Ucar
{"title":"The Effect of Build Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed Custom Tray Resin Specimens.","authors":"Fatma Uslu Kavrama, Nazli Aydin, Halit Yosuncigir, Yurdanur Ucar","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of build angle on the flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (E), and hardness (VH) of stereolithography (SLA) based 3D-printed custom tray resin.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>3D-printed specimens with dimensions of 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 3.3 mm ± 0.2 mm were manufactured with different build angles (90, 120, 135, 150, 180 degrees) using custom tray resin. For preparing the specimens in the control groups, the autopolymerizing (AP) resin and the ultraviolet polymerizing (UV) resin were used. FS and E were determined by a three-point bending test, and hardness was evaluated with the VH test. Fracture surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis of the data was made using a one way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett T3 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering all parameters, the UV group was statistically significantly lower than the other groups. The mean E value of the 90D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.000) and the 180D group (P=.002). The mean E value of the 120D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.003) and the 180D group (P=.013). The AP group showed a higher mean VH number (20.20 ±2.08), and the difference was statistically significant compared to the 3D-printed groups (P<.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering its mechanical properties, it was appropriate to arrange the build angles to different degrees when manufacturing reliable custom trays using SLA. 3D printed custom tray production method was a more standard method compared to AP and UV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of build angle on the flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (E), and hardness (VH) of stereolithography (SLA) based 3D-printed custom tray resin.

Material and methods: 3D-printed specimens with dimensions of 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 3.3 mm ± 0.2 mm were manufactured with different build angles (90, 120, 135, 150, 180 degrees) using custom tray resin. For preparing the specimens in the control groups, the autopolymerizing (AP) resin and the ultraviolet polymerizing (UV) resin were used. FS and E were determined by a three-point bending test, and hardness was evaluated with the VH test. Fracture surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis of the data was made using a one way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett T3 test.

Results: Considering all parameters, the UV group was statistically significantly lower than the other groups. The mean E value of the 90D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.000) and the 180D group (P=.002). The mean E value of the 120D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.003) and the 180D group (P=.013). The AP group showed a higher mean VH number (20.20 ±2.08), and the difference was statistically significant compared to the 3D-printed groups (P<.005).

Conclusions: Considering its mechanical properties, it was appropriate to arrange the build angles to different degrees when manufacturing reliable custom trays using SLA. 3D printed custom tray production method was a more standard method compared to AP and UV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning Versus Analog Impression for Multiple Implant-supported Prostheses in Long Edentulous Spans: A Comparative Clinical Study. Effect of Number and Angulation of Implants on Accuracy of Digital Impression in Completely Edentulous Arch. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners in Endocrown Restorations. The Effect of Build Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed Custom Tray Resin Specimens. Maxillary All-on-6 Treatment Using Zygomatic Implants. Bone Loss Evaluation by CBCT: 3-Year Follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1