Exploring Student Misconceptions in Bonding and Resonance: A Computational Chemistry Exercise for General Chemistry Laboratory

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0069410.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00694
Alyssa V. B. Santos*, Alexander J. Rupprecht, Katsu Ogawa, Patrick W. Schneider, Adam M. Brown, Henri C. Santos and Scott Simpson*, 
{"title":"Exploring Student Misconceptions in Bonding and Resonance: A Computational Chemistry Exercise for General Chemistry Laboratory","authors":"Alyssa V. B. Santos*,&nbsp;Alexander J. Rupprecht,&nbsp;Katsu Ogawa,&nbsp;Patrick W. Schneider,&nbsp;Adam M. Brown,&nbsp;Henri C. Santos and Scott Simpson*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0069410.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >An <i>in-silico</i> exercise was developed for a general chemistry laboratory course at St. Bonaventure University in which students examined potential energy surfaces, molecular orbital diagrams, and how bond orders and Lewis structures are connected. Pre- and post-assessment data suggests that, though students learned from the exercise, they are not connecting the concepts of bond order, Lewis structures, and resonance. There was a statistically significant improvement in the assessment scores before and after the laboratory experiment, and there was no statistical difference between the post-assessment and the follow-up assessment, which occurred after students completed the lab report 1 week after the initial experiment. The data suggest an improved understanding of computational chemistry concepts as well as improvement in the individual concepts of resonance, Lewis structures, and bond orders. However, an assessment question connecting these concepts did not show an improvement. An additional questionnaire was conducted to explore this discrepancy. This study indicates that more investigation is necessary with regard to students’ ability to make logical connections among bond orders, Lewis structures, and resonance.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An in-silico exercise was developed for a general chemistry laboratory course at St. Bonaventure University in which students examined potential energy surfaces, molecular orbital diagrams, and how bond orders and Lewis structures are connected. Pre- and post-assessment data suggests that, though students learned from the exercise, they are not connecting the concepts of bond order, Lewis structures, and resonance. There was a statistically significant improvement in the assessment scores before and after the laboratory experiment, and there was no statistical difference between the post-assessment and the follow-up assessment, which occurred after students completed the lab report 1 week after the initial experiment. The data suggest an improved understanding of computational chemistry concepts as well as improvement in the individual concepts of resonance, Lewis structures, and bond orders. However, an assessment question connecting these concepts did not show an improvement. An additional questionnaire was conducted to explore this discrepancy. This study indicates that more investigation is necessary with regard to students’ ability to make logical connections among bond orders, Lewis structures, and resonance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索学生在键合和共振方面的误解:普通化学实验室的计算化学练习
圣博纳文图大学为普通化学实验课程开发了一个实验室内练习,让学生研究势能面、分子轨道图以及键序和路易斯结构之间的联系。前后评估数据表明,虽然学生从练习中学到了知识,但他们并没有将键序、路易斯结构和共振的概念联系起来。实验前后的评估分数在统计学上有显著提高,而实验后评估和后续评估(学生在初始实验一周后完成实验报告)在统计学上没有差异。数据表明,学生对计算化学概念的理解有所提高,对共振、路易斯结构和键序等单个概念的理解也有所提高。然而,将这些概念联系起来的评估问题并没有显示出改进。为探究这一差异,我们又进行了一次问卷调查。这项研究表明,有必要对学生在键序、路易斯结构和共振之间建立逻辑联系的能力进行更多的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Rapid and Facile Preparation of Carbon Tape Electrodes for the Evaluation of Metal Oxides as OER Catalysts In Situ Growth of COFs within Cork for Oil–Water Separation: A Comprehensive Chemistry Experiment for Undergraduates UFV Game: Creating a Fun Upgradeable Card Game to Engage Students in Learning Chemical Formula and Valence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1