Revisiting Metaphor as an Analytical Tool for Design Research1

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE DESIGN ISSUES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1162/desi_a_00781
Elif Sen Himaki;Ozge Merzali Celikoglu;Klaus Krippendorff
{"title":"Revisiting Metaphor as an Analytical Tool for Design Research1","authors":"Elif Sen Himaki;Ozge Merzali Celikoglu;Klaus Krippendorff","doi":"10.1162/desi_a_00781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphor has long been a topic of investigation in scholarly design research. Studies across various design contexts have demonstrated the value of deliberately exploring and using metaphors to facilitate different phases of the design process. However, the analytical potential of metaphors has often been overshadowed by their generative use, leaving their significance in the research phase of the design process relatively unexplored. This article aims to broaden our understanding of the role metaphors can play in design, delving into the analytical role of metaphors in human-centered design research, particularly focusing on the insights that users' and other stakeholders' metaphors can offer. We present the rationale for adopting metaphor analysis as a method for design research, drawing on conceptual metaphor theory and evidence from analogous research studies. Acknowledging the natural creativity in language use of ordinary people, we argue for the potential this inherent creativity holds for user research and co-creativity settings. We discuss the value of attending to the metaphors in design research, introduce relevant concepts from linguistic metaphor analysis, and demonstrate their practical application on designers' use of user metaphors. We address the advantages and challenges of adopting metaphor analysis as a method for design research and provide recommendations for designers seeking to instrumentalize metaphors in their design processes.","PeriodicalId":51560,"journal":{"name":"DESIGN ISSUES","volume":"40 4","pages":"67-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIGN ISSUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10715583/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metaphor has long been a topic of investigation in scholarly design research. Studies across various design contexts have demonstrated the value of deliberately exploring and using metaphors to facilitate different phases of the design process. However, the analytical potential of metaphors has often been overshadowed by their generative use, leaving their significance in the research phase of the design process relatively unexplored. This article aims to broaden our understanding of the role metaphors can play in design, delving into the analytical role of metaphors in human-centered design research, particularly focusing on the insights that users' and other stakeholders' metaphors can offer. We present the rationale for adopting metaphor analysis as a method for design research, drawing on conceptual metaphor theory and evidence from analogous research studies. Acknowledging the natural creativity in language use of ordinary people, we argue for the potential this inherent creativity holds for user research and co-creativity settings. We discuss the value of attending to the metaphors in design research, introduce relevant concepts from linguistic metaphor analysis, and demonstrate their practical application on designers' use of user metaphors. We address the advantages and challenges of adopting metaphor analysis as a method for design research and provide recommendations for designers seeking to instrumentalize metaphors in their design processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视隐喻作为设计研究分析工具的作用1
长期以来,隐喻一直是设计学术研究中的一个研究课题。各种设计背景下的研究都证明了有意探索和使用隐喻来促进设计过程不同阶段的价值。然而,隐喻的分析潜力往往被其生成性使用所掩盖,使其在设计过程研究阶段的意义相对来说未被探索。本文旨在拓宽我们对隐喻在设计中的作用的理解,深入探讨隐喻在以人为本的设计研究中的分析作用,尤其关注用户和其他利益相关者的隐喻所能提供的见解。我们借鉴概念隐喻理论和类似研究的证据,阐述了将隐喻分析作为设计研究方法的基本原理。我们认识到普通人在使用语言时的自然创造力,并论证了这种内在创造力在用户研究和共同创造环境中的潜力。我们讨论了在设计研究中关注隐喻的价值,介绍了语言隐喻分析的相关概念,并展示了这些概念在设计师使用用户隐喻时的实际应用。我们探讨了采用隐喻分析作为设计研究方法的优势和挑战,并为设计师在设计过程中寻求隐喻工具化提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DESIGN ISSUES
DESIGN ISSUES ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The first American academic journal to examine design history, theory, and criticism, Design Issues provokes inquiry into the cultural and intellectual issues surrounding design. Regular features include theoretical and critical articles by professional and scholarly contributors, extensive book reviews, and illustrations. Special guest-edited issues concentrate on particular themes, such as artificial intelligence, product seminars, design in Asia, and design education. Scholars, students, and professionals in all the design fields are readers of each issue.
期刊最新文献
Introduction The Intersection of Place and Game Design: The Case of Two Classic African Board Games The Disobedience of Design, (vol. Radical Thinkers in Design) Ethnographies of Unimagined Possibilities: Toward a Conversational Paradigm for Human-Centered Design Research Design and Making Things Better: Relating the Pragmatism of John Dewey and Richard McKeon in Design Inquiry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1