José M. Ramia, Mario Serradilla-Martín, Celia Villodre, Juan J. Rubio, Fernando Rotellar, Ajith K. Siriwardena, Go Wakabayashi, Fausto Catena
{"title":"International Delphi consensus on the management of percutaneous choleystostomy in acute cholecystitis (E-AHPBA, ANS, WSES societies)","authors":"José M. Ramia, Mario Serradilla-Martín, Celia Villodre, Juan J. Rubio, Fernando Rotellar, Ajith K. Siriwardena, Go Wakabayashi, Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00561-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a progressive increase in the use of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in acute cholecystitis (AC) over the last decades due to population aging, and the support of guidelines (Tokyo Guidelines (TG), World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Guidelines) as a valid therapeutical option. However, there are many unanswered questions about the management of PCs. An international consensus on indications and PC management using Delphi methodology with contributions from experts from three surgical societies (EAHPBA, ANS, WSES) have been performed. A two-round Delphi consensus, which included 27 questions, was sent to key opinion leaders in AC. Participants were asked to indicate their ‘agreement/disagreement’ using a 5-point Likert scale. Survey items with less than 70% consensus were excluded from the second round. For inclusion in the final recommendations, each survey item had to have reached a group consensus (≥ 70% agreement) by the end of the two survey rounds. 54 completed both rounds (82% of invitees). Six questions got > 70% and are included in consensus recommendations: In patients with acute cholecystitis, when there is a clear indication of PC, it is not necessary to wait 48 h to be carried out; Surgery is the first therapeutic option for the TG grade II acute cholecystitis in a patient suitable for surgery; Before PC removal a cholangiography should be done; There is no indication for PC in Tokyo Guidelines (TG) grade I patients; Transhepatic approach is the route of choice for PC; and after PC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred approach (93.1%). Only six statements about PC management after AC got an international consensus. An international guideline about the management of PCs are necessary.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00561-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There has been a progressive increase in the use of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in acute cholecystitis (AC) over the last decades due to population aging, and the support of guidelines (Tokyo Guidelines (TG), World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Guidelines) as a valid therapeutical option. However, there are many unanswered questions about the management of PCs. An international consensus on indications and PC management using Delphi methodology with contributions from experts from three surgical societies (EAHPBA, ANS, WSES) have been performed. A two-round Delphi consensus, which included 27 questions, was sent to key opinion leaders in AC. Participants were asked to indicate their ‘agreement/disagreement’ using a 5-point Likert scale. Survey items with less than 70% consensus were excluded from the second round. For inclusion in the final recommendations, each survey item had to have reached a group consensus (≥ 70% agreement) by the end of the two survey rounds. 54 completed both rounds (82% of invitees). Six questions got > 70% and are included in consensus recommendations: In patients with acute cholecystitis, when there is a clear indication of PC, it is not necessary to wait 48 h to be carried out; Surgery is the first therapeutic option for the TG grade II acute cholecystitis in a patient suitable for surgery; Before PC removal a cholangiography should be done; There is no indication for PC in Tokyo Guidelines (TG) grade I patients; Transhepatic approach is the route of choice for PC; and after PC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred approach (93.1%). Only six statements about PC management after AC got an international consensus. An international guideline about the management of PCs are necessary.
过去几十年来,由于人口老龄化以及相关指南(《东京指南》(TG)、《世界急诊外科学会指南》(WSES))的支持,经皮胆囊造口术(PC)作为一种有效的治疗方法在急性胆囊炎(AC)中的应用逐渐增多。然而,关于 PC 的管理仍有许多未解之谜。三个外科协会(EAHPBA、ANS 和 WSES)的专家采用德尔菲方法就 PC 的适应症和管理达成了国际共识。包括 27 个问题在内的两轮德尔菲共识已发送给 AC 的主要意见领袖。要求参与者使用 5 点李克特量表来表示 "同意/不同意"。共识度低于 70% 的调查项目被排除在第二轮调查之外。每个调查项目必须在两轮调查结束时达成小组共识(≥ 70% 的一致意见),才能纳入最终建议。54 人完成了两轮调查(占受邀者的 82%)。有六个问题的同意率大于 70%,并被纳入共识建议中:对于急性胆囊炎患者,如果有明确的 PC 指征,无需等待 48 小时即可实施手术;对于适合手术的 TG II 级急性胆囊炎患者,手术是首选治疗方案;PC 切除前应进行胆管造影;东京指南 (TG) I 级患者没有 PC 指征;经肝途径是 PC 的首选途径;PC 后,腹腔镜胆囊切除术是首选方法(93.1%)。只有六项关于 AC 后 PC 处理的声明获得了国际共识。有必要就 PC 的管理制定国际指南。
期刊介绍:
The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.