Pub Date : 2025-01-29DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1
Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Fredric M. Pieracci, Zsolt J. Balogh, Raul Coimbra, Joseph M. Galante, Andreas Hecker, Dieter Weber, Zachary M. Bauman, Susan Kartiko, Bhavik Patel, SarahAnn S. Whitbeck, Thomas W. White, Kevin N. Harrell, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Brian Tian, Francesco Amico, Solomon G. Beka, Luigi Bonavina, Marco Ceresoli, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Federico Coccolini, Yunfeng Cui, Francesca Dal Mas, Belinda De Simone, Isidoro Di Carlo, Salomone Di Saverio, Agron Dogjani, Andreas Fette, Gustavo P. Fraga, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Jim S. Khan, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vitor F. Kruger, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, Andrea Mingoli, David Costa Navarro, Eliseo Passera, Michele Pisano, Mauro Podda, Emanuele Russo, Boris Sakakushev, Domenico Santonastaso, Massimo Sartelli, Vishal G. Shelat, Edward Tan, Imtiaz Wani, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Walter L. Biffl, Ian Civil, Rifat Latifi, Ingo Marzi, Edoardo Picetti, Manos Pikoulis, Vanni Agnoletti, Francesca Bravi, Carlo Vall..
<p><b>Correction to: World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33</b></p><p><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2</b>.</p><p>The original publication of this article [1] contained an incorrect affiliation for author Imtiaz Wani. The incorrect and correct information is listed in this correction article; the original article has been updated.</p><p>Incorrect</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India</p><p>Correct</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, India</p><ol data-track-component="outbound reference" data-track-context="references section"><li data-counter="1."><p>Sermonesi G, Bertelli R, Pieracci FM. et al. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.</p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden="true" focusable="false" height="16" role="img" width="16"><use xlink:href="#icon-eds-i-download-medium" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"></use></svg></p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy</p><p>Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Emanuele Russo, Domenico Santonastaso, Vanni Agnoletti, Carlo Vallicelli & Fausto Catena</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA</p><p>Fredric M. Pieracci & Ernest E. Moore</p></li><li><p>Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia</p><p>Zsolt J. Balogh</p></li><li><p>Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA</p><p>Raul Coimbra</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA</p><p>Joseph M. Galante</p></li><li><p>Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany</p><p>Andreas Hecker</p></li><li><p>Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia</p><p>Dieter Weber</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA</p><p>Zachary M. Bauman</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA</p><p>Susan Kartiko</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia</p><p>Bhavik Patel</p></li><li><p>Chest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>SarahAnn S. Whitbeck</p></li><li><p>Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>Thomas W. White</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USA</p><p>Kevin N. Ha
Correction to:World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.The 本文[1]最初发表时,作者Imtiaz Wani的单位有误。本更正文章列出了错误和正确的信息;原文已更新。IncorrectImtiaz Wani43.印度斯利那加,Sheri-Kashmir 医学院外科系CorrectImtiaz Wani43.Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper.2024; 19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.下载参考文献作者和工作单位意大利切塞纳 Maurizio Bufalini 医院普通和急诊外科、麻醉和重症监护室贾科莫-塞莫内西、里卡多-贝尔泰利、达尼埃莱-佩里纳、阿莱西亚-兰皮尼、埃马纽埃尔-鲁索、多梅尼科-桑托纳斯塔索、万尼-阿格诺莱蒂、卡罗-瓦利切利& 福斯托-卡泰纳美国科罗拉多大学医学院外科系美国科罗拉多州丹佛市弗雷德里克-M.Pieracci & Ernest E. Moore澳大利亚新南威尔士州纽卡斯尔市约翰-亨特医院和纽卡斯尔大学创伤学系Zsolt J. Balogh美国加利福尼亚州莫雷诺谷河滨大学卫生系统医疗中心比较效果和临床结果研究中心Aaul Coimbra美国加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校外科创伤和急症护理外科Joseph M. Galante美国加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校外科创伤和急症护理外科急诊医学系M.Galante德国吉森大学医院普外科和胸外科急诊医学部Andreas Hecker澳大利亚珀斯皇家医院创伤外科Dieter Weber美国内布拉斯加州奥马哈市内布拉斯加大学医学中心外科Zachary M. Bauman美国内布拉斯加州奥马哈市内布拉斯加大学医学中心外科Department of Surgery.BaumanDepartment of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USASusan KartikoDivision of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, AustraliaBhavik PatelChest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USASarahAnn S.WhitbeckIntermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThomas W. WhiteDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USAKevin N. HarrellDepartment of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SingaporeBrian TianDiscipline of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, NSW, AustraliaFrancesco AmicoEthiopian Air Force Hospital, Bishoftu, Oromia, EthiopiaSolomon G. BekaDepartment of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.贝卡意大利米兰米兰大学 IRCCS Policlinico San Donato 外科学系路易吉-博纳维纳意大利蒙扎米兰比可卡大学医学和外科学系普通外科和急诊外科马可-切雷索利意大利帕维亚帕维亚大学 Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo 外科学系洛伦佐-科比安奇&;Luca AnsaloniCollegium Medicum, University of Social Sciences, Lodz, PolandLorenzo Cobianchi &;Francesca Dal Mas意大利比萨,比萨大学医院普通、急诊和创伤外科Federico Coccolini天津医科大学南开临床医学院天津南开医院外科,天津、意大利里米尼 Infermi 医院微创急诊和普通外科 Belinda De Simone 外科科学和先进技术系、意大利卡塔尼亚卡塔尼亚大学 Cannizzaro 医院普外科Isidoro Di Carlo 意大利马尔凯大区圣贝内德托德尔特龙托医院普外科Salomone Di Saverio 地拉那医科大学普外科阿尔巴尼亚地拉那Agron DogjaniPediatric Surgery,Children's Care Center,SRH Klinikum Suhl,Suhl,Thueringen,GermanyAndreas FetteDivision of Trauma Surgery,School of Medical Sciences,University of Campinas,Campinas,BrazilGustavo P.Fraga & Vitor F. KrugerFaculdade de Medicina, SUPREMA, Hospital Universitario Terezinha de Jesus de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, BrazilCarlos Augusto GomesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UKJim S. KhanDepartments of Surgery and Countermanship, Portsmouth, UKJim S. KrugerFaculdade de Medicina, SUPREMA.KirkpatrickAbdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandAri LeppäniemiDepartment of Surgical Diseases No.
{"title":"Correction: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper","authors":"Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Fredric M. Pieracci, Zsolt J. Balogh, Raul Coimbra, Joseph M. Galante, Andreas Hecker, Dieter Weber, Zachary M. Bauman, Susan Kartiko, Bhavik Patel, SarahAnn S. Whitbeck, Thomas W. White, Kevin N. Harrell, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Brian Tian, Francesco Amico, Solomon G. Beka, Luigi Bonavina, Marco Ceresoli, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Federico Coccolini, Yunfeng Cui, Francesca Dal Mas, Belinda De Simone, Isidoro Di Carlo, Salomone Di Saverio, Agron Dogjani, Andreas Fette, Gustavo P. Fraga, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Jim S. Khan, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vitor F. Kruger, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, Andrea Mingoli, David Costa Navarro, Eliseo Passera, Michele Pisano, Mauro Podda, Emanuele Russo, Boris Sakakushev, Domenico Santonastaso, Massimo Sartelli, Vishal G. Shelat, Edward Tan, Imtiaz Wani, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Walter L. Biffl, Ian Civil, Rifat Latifi, Ingo Marzi, Edoardo Picetti, Manos Pikoulis, Vanni Agnoletti, Francesca Bravi, Carlo Vall..","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Correction to: World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33</b></p><p><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2</b>.</p><p>The original publication of this article [1] contained an incorrect affiliation for author Imtiaz Wani. The incorrect and correct information is listed in this correction article; the original article has been updated.</p><p>Incorrect</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India</p><p>Correct</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, India</p><ol data-track-component=\"outbound reference\" data-track-context=\"references section\"><li data-counter=\"1.\"><p>Sermonesi G, Bertelli R, Pieracci FM. et al. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.</p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy</p><p>Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Emanuele Russo, Domenico Santonastaso, Vanni Agnoletti, Carlo Vallicelli & Fausto Catena</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA</p><p>Fredric M. Pieracci & Ernest E. Moore</p></li><li><p>Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia</p><p>Zsolt J. Balogh</p></li><li><p>Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA</p><p>Raul Coimbra</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA</p><p>Joseph M. Galante</p></li><li><p>Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany</p><p>Andreas Hecker</p></li><li><p>Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia</p><p>Dieter Weber</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA</p><p>Zachary M. Bauman</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA</p><p>Susan Kartiko</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia</p><p>Bhavik Patel</p></li><li><p>Chest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>SarahAnn S. Whitbeck</p></li><li><p>Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>Thomas W. White</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USA</p><p>Kevin N. Ha","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143054997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-27DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0
Chien-Hung Liao, David A. Spain, Chih-Chi Chen, Chi-Tung Cheng, Wei-Cheng Lin, Dong-Ru Ho, Heng-Fu Lin, Fausto Catena
Intrabdominal pressure (IAP) is an important parameter. Elevated IAP can reduce visceral perfusion, lead to intraabdominal hypertension, and result in life-threatening abdominal compartment syndrome. While ingestible capsular devices have been used for various abdominal diagnoses, their application in continuous IAP monitoring remains unproven. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of IAP measurement using a digital capsule PressureDOT, an ingestible capsule equipped with wireless transmission capability and a pressure sensor, then compared its reliability with conventional intravesical method. Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgeries were recruited. During surgery, we created pneumoperitoneum by inflating CO2 into the peritoneal cavity and IAP was simultaneously monitored using both the ingestible capsules and intravesical measurements from Foley catheter. We assessed the feasibility of signal transmission and the accuracy of pressure measurements. Six patients were enrolled in this pilot study. No adverse events were reported, and the average first-intake time was within 24 h. All capsules were successfully expelled, with an average excretion time of 81 h. In the summarized data, the mean IAPdot is 0.6 mmHg lower than the IAPivp, with a standard deviation of 1.68 mmHg. However, capsule measurements showed excellent correlation with intravesical IAP measurements, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.8821–0.9320). Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using digital capsules for continuous IAP monitoring, providing the agreement between IAP measurements from digital capsules and conventional intravesical measurement within a near-normal pressure.
{"title":"Feasibility and accuracy of continuous intraabdominal pressure monitoring with a capsular device in human pilot trial","authors":"Chien-Hung Liao, David A. Spain, Chih-Chi Chen, Chi-Tung Cheng, Wei-Cheng Lin, Dong-Ru Ho, Heng-Fu Lin, Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0","url":null,"abstract":"Intrabdominal pressure (IAP) is an important parameter. Elevated IAP can reduce visceral perfusion, lead to intraabdominal hypertension, and result in life-threatening abdominal compartment syndrome. While ingestible capsular devices have been used for various abdominal diagnoses, their application in continuous IAP monitoring remains unproven. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of IAP measurement using a digital capsule PressureDOT, an ingestible capsule equipped with wireless transmission capability and a pressure sensor, then compared its reliability with conventional intravesical method. Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgeries were recruited. During surgery, we created pneumoperitoneum by inflating CO2 into the peritoneal cavity and IAP was simultaneously monitored using both the ingestible capsules and intravesical measurements from Foley catheter. We assessed the feasibility of signal transmission and the accuracy of pressure measurements. Six patients were enrolled in this pilot study. No adverse events were reported, and the average first-intake time was within 24 h. All capsules were successfully expelled, with an average excretion time of 81 h. In the summarized data, the mean IAPdot is 0.6 mmHg lower than the IAPivp, with a standard deviation of 1.68 mmHg. However, capsule measurements showed excellent correlation with intravesical IAP measurements, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.8821–0.9320). Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using digital capsules for continuous IAP monitoring, providing the agreement between IAP measurements from digital capsules and conventional intravesical measurement within a near-normal pressure.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143044100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-23DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z
Hassan Elbiss, Shamsa Al Awar, Jamal Koteesh, Howaida Khair, Sara Maki, Dana H. Abdalla, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality causing one-fourth of all maternal deaths. We aimed to study the role of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in controlling PPH and its impact on the need for hysterectomy. We studied patients who were diagnosed with primary PPH between February 2012 and March 2020 at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing interventional radiology via UAE. Logistic regression analysis was done to define the factors that predict the need for emergency UAE. Out of 79 patients who had elective (n = 53) or emergency (n = 26) embolization, the placenta previa accreta (69.8% vs. 23.1%) and placenta previa (24.4% vs. 3.8%) were the common indications for elective versus emergency UAE (p < 0.001). The indication for UAE was the most significant factor for predicting an emergency procedure (p = 0.002) with placenta previa being significantly different from other indications (p < 0.001). Bleeding stopped in 78/79 patients (success rate of 98.7%) following UAE. Those who failed stopping of the bleeding were similar between the elective and emergency IR, (1/53 (1.9%) compared with 0/26 (0%), p = 0.99 Fisher’s Exact test). Overall, eight patients (10%) had hysterectomy, one of them was needed as the final solution to stop bleeding. There were no maternal deaths. Interventional radiological UAE is very efficient in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. It should be recommended as the first line of treatment for significant bleeding when expertise and facilities are available. It increases survival, reduces hysterectomy rate, without a difference if done as an emergency or elective procedure.
{"title":"Uterine artery embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage","authors":"Hassan Elbiss, Shamsa Al Awar, Jamal Koteesh, Howaida Khair, Sara Maki, Dana H. Abdalla, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z","url":null,"abstract":"Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality causing one-fourth of all maternal deaths. We aimed to study the role of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in controlling PPH and its impact on the need for hysterectomy. We studied patients who were diagnosed with primary PPH between February 2012 and March 2020 at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing interventional radiology via UAE. Logistic regression analysis was done to define the factors that predict the need for emergency UAE. Out of 79 patients who had elective (n = 53) or emergency (n = 26) embolization, the placenta previa accreta (69.8% vs. 23.1%) and placenta previa (24.4% vs. 3.8%) were the common indications for elective versus emergency UAE (p < 0.001). The indication for UAE was the most significant factor for predicting an emergency procedure (p = 0.002) with placenta previa being significantly different from other indications (p < 0.001). Bleeding stopped in 78/79 patients (success rate of 98.7%) following UAE. Those who failed stopping of the bleeding were similar between the elective and emergency IR, (1/53 (1.9%) compared with 0/26 (0%), p = 0.99 Fisher’s Exact test). Overall, eight patients (10%) had hysterectomy, one of them was needed as the final solution to stop bleeding. There were no maternal deaths. Interventional radiological UAE is very efficient in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. It should be recommended as the first line of treatment for significant bleeding when expertise and facilities are available. It increases survival, reduces hysterectomy rate, without a difference if done as an emergency or elective procedure.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143020690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7
Jin Young Lee, Seheon Kim, Jin Bong Ye, Jin Suk Lee, Younghoon Sul
Trauma surgery is a fundamental aspect of medicine. According to the 2023 mortality report from Statistics Korea, external factors such as intentional self-harm and transportation incidents are leading causes of death among individuals aged 10 to 30, accounting for 7.9% of overall mortality. Despite advances in the field, specialization has hindered comprehensive trauma care. In South Korea, regional trauma centers have been established to meet critical trauma management needs; however, challenges remain, including a shortage of trauma surgeons and inefficient resource utilization. The reluctance of surgical residents to pursue trauma training exacerbates the scarcity of qualified specialists. Trauma surgeons often bear extensive responsibilities, which limits their ability to perform prompt interventions. Acute Care Surgery (ACS) offers a model to integrate trauma and non-trauma surgical care, enabling hospitals to implement effective protocols for urgent cases and improving patient outcomes. Research indicates that ACS enhances emergency surgical management, increases training opportunities for residents, and improves job satisfaction among participating surgeons. Integrating ACS into South Korea’s healthcare system is essential to optimize resource allocation and improve emergency care, ultimately leading to enhanced public health outcomes.
{"title":"Integrating acute care surgery in South Korea: enhancing trauma and non-trauma emergency care","authors":"Jin Young Lee, Seheon Kim, Jin Bong Ye, Jin Suk Lee, Younghoon Sul","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7","url":null,"abstract":"Trauma surgery is a fundamental aspect of medicine. According to the 2023 mortality report from Statistics Korea, external factors such as intentional self-harm and transportation incidents are leading causes of death among individuals aged 10 to 30, accounting for 7.9% of overall mortality. Despite advances in the field, specialization has hindered comprehensive trauma care. In South Korea, regional trauma centers have been established to meet critical trauma management needs; however, challenges remain, including a shortage of trauma surgeons and inefficient resource utilization. The reluctance of surgical residents to pursue trauma training exacerbates the scarcity of qualified specialists. Trauma surgeons often bear extensive responsibilities, which limits their ability to perform prompt interventions. Acute Care Surgery (ACS) offers a model to integrate trauma and non-trauma surgical care, enabling hospitals to implement effective protocols for urgent cases and improving patient outcomes. Research indicates that ACS enhances emergency surgical management, increases training opportunities for residents, and improves job satisfaction among participating surgeons. Integrating ACS into South Korea’s healthcare system is essential to optimize resource allocation and improve emergency care, ultimately leading to enhanced public health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142990061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9
Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Arda Isik, Fausto Rosa, Diego Visconti, Taras Nechay, Sharfuddin Chowdhury, Abdourahmane Ndong, Tushar S. Mishra, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Francesco Piscioneri, Edward C.T.H. Tan
Around five billion people globally lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical facilities and care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global initiatives have been launched, including efforts led by organizations. Also, regional efforts have shed light on the unique challenges faced by different areas within LMICs. Despite these efforts, many countries still face significant challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited availability of trained surgical personnel, lack of essential medical equipment, and insufficient financial resources allocated to healthcare and their related possible factors. Here is that we aim to identify the progress made in areas such as capacity building, training programs, infrastructure development, and policy reforms, as well as highlight the gaps that persist, providing a foundation for future research. Such a comprehensive scoping review will be crucial to enhance surgical care services and ultimately improve health outcomes in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search up to November 2024 will be conducted across six major databases. PubMed, Scopus, Ovoid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database. The methodology will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. The first version of this project will not include a quality appraisal.
在低收入和中等收入国家,全球约有50亿人无法获得安全、及时和负担得起的手术设施和护理。全球倡议已经启动,包括由各组织领导的努力。此外,区域努力揭示了中低收入国家不同地区面临的独特挑战。尽管作出了这些努力,但许多国家仍然面临重大挑战,包括基础设施不足、训练有素的外科人员有限、缺乏基本医疗设备、分配给保健及其相关可能因素的财政资源不足。我们的目标是确定在能力建设、培训计划、基础设施发展和政策改革等领域取得的进展,并强调仍然存在的差距,为未来的研究奠定基础。这种全面的范围审查对于加强外科护理服务并最终改善中低收入国家的健康结果至关重要。截止到2024年11月,将在6个主要数据库中进行全面的文献检索。PubMed、Scopus、Ovoid、Web of Science、Cochrane Central、CNKI数据库。方法将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)清单的首选报告项目。这个项目的第一个版本将不包括质量评估。
{"title":"Global perspectives in acute and emergency general surgery in low and middle-income countries: a WSES project protocol for scoping review on global surgery","authors":"Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Arda Isik, Fausto Rosa, Diego Visconti, Taras Nechay, Sharfuddin Chowdhury, Abdourahmane Ndong, Tushar S. Mishra, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Francesco Piscioneri, Edward C.T.H. Tan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9","url":null,"abstract":"Around five billion people globally lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical facilities and care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global initiatives have been launched, including efforts led by organizations. Also, regional efforts have shed light on the unique challenges faced by different areas within LMICs. Despite these efforts, many countries still face significant challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited availability of trained surgical personnel, lack of essential medical equipment, and insufficient financial resources allocated to healthcare and their related possible factors. Here is that we aim to identify the progress made in areas such as capacity building, training programs, infrastructure development, and policy reforms, as well as highlight the gaps that persist, providing a foundation for future research. Such a comprehensive scoping review will be crucial to enhance surgical care services and ultimately improve health outcomes in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search up to November 2024 will be conducted across six major databases. PubMed, Scopus, Ovoid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database. The methodology will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. The first version of this project will not include a quality appraisal.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142940300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x
Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Isabella Van-Londoño, Antonio Pesce
Empirical antibiotic therapy is often initiated during the hospital stay while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach is generally justified in patients with moderate (Tokyo II) and severe (Tokyo III) acute cholecystitis, where organ dysfunction occurs as a result of the inflammatory or infectious process. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the use of antibiotics in patients with mild (Tokyo I) cholecystitis. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative antibiotic use on outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies evaluating the use or non-use of preoperative antibiotics in patients with acute cholecystitis. Eligible studies were required to provide at least one of the following datasets: postoperative complication rate, postoperative infectious complication rate, or positive culture rate. The synthesis reports were prepared using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework. A total of 622 articles were initially identified, of which 2 met the inclusion criteria. These two articles included 331 patients. They reported higher rates of postoperative complications and bacterobilia in the group that received preoperative antibiotics; however, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Based on current evidence, no recommendation can be made regarding the therapeutic use of antibiotics in mild acute cholecystitis while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
{"title":"Pre-operative antibiotics in patients with acute mild cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it really useful? A systematic review","authors":"Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Isabella Van-Londoño, Antonio Pesce","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x","url":null,"abstract":"Empirical antibiotic therapy is often initiated during the hospital stay while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach is generally justified in patients with moderate (Tokyo II) and severe (Tokyo III) acute cholecystitis, where organ dysfunction occurs as a result of the inflammatory or infectious process. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the use of antibiotics in patients with mild (Tokyo I) cholecystitis. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative antibiotic use on outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies evaluating the use or non-use of preoperative antibiotics in patients with acute cholecystitis. Eligible studies were required to provide at least one of the following datasets: postoperative complication rate, postoperative infectious complication rate, or positive culture rate. The synthesis reports were prepared using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework. A total of 622 articles were initially identified, of which 2 met the inclusion criteria. These two articles included 331 patients. They reported higher rates of postoperative complications and bacterobilia in the group that received preoperative antibiotics; however, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Based on current evidence, no recommendation can be made regarding the therapeutic use of antibiotics in mild acute cholecystitis while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142940358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-07DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5
Charles Dupuy, Thibault Martinez, Olivier Duranteau, Tobias Gauss, Natacha Kapandji, Jean Pasqueron, Mathilde Holleville, Georges Abi Abdallah, Anatole Harrois, Véronique Ramonda, Delphine Huet-Garrigue, Théophane Doublet, Marc Leone, Vincent Legros, Julien Pottecher, Gérard Audibert, Ingrid Millot, Benjamin Popoff, Benjamin Cohen, Fanny Vardon-Bounes, Mathieu Willig, Pierre Gosset, Emilie Angles, Nouchan Mellati, Nicolas Higel, Mathieu Boutonnet, Pierre Pasquier
To reduce the number of deaths caused by exsanguination, the initial management of severe trauma aims to prevent, if not limit, the lethal triad, which consists of acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. Recently, several studies have suggested adding hypocalcemia to the lethal triad to form the lethal diamond, but the evidence supporting this change is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the lethal triad and lethal diamond for their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients receiving transfusion. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in TraumaBase®, a French database (2011–2023). The patients included in this study were all trauma patients who had received transfusions of at least 1 unit of red blood cells (RBCs) within the first 6 h of hospital admission and for whom ionized calcium measurements were available. Hypocalcemia was defined as an ionized calcium level < 1.1 mmol/L. A total of 2141 severe trauma patients were included (median age: 39, interquartile range [IQR]: 26–57; median injury severity score: 27, IQR: 17–41). Patients primarily presented with blunt trauma (81.7%), and a 24-h mortality rate of 16.1% was observed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed no significant difference in the association with 24-h mortality between the lethal diamond (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.71) and the lethal triad (AUC: 0.72) (p = 0.26). The strength of the association with 24-h mortality was similar between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond, with Cramer’s V values of 0.29 and 0.28, respectively. This study revealed no significant difference between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in terms of their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients requiring transfusion. These results raise questions about the independent role of hypocalcemia in early mortality.
{"title":"Comparison of the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in severe trauma patients: a multicenter cohort","authors":"Charles Dupuy, Thibault Martinez, Olivier Duranteau, Tobias Gauss, Natacha Kapandji, Jean Pasqueron, Mathilde Holleville, Georges Abi Abdallah, Anatole Harrois, Véronique Ramonda, Delphine Huet-Garrigue, Théophane Doublet, Marc Leone, Vincent Legros, Julien Pottecher, Gérard Audibert, Ingrid Millot, Benjamin Popoff, Benjamin Cohen, Fanny Vardon-Bounes, Mathieu Willig, Pierre Gosset, Emilie Angles, Nouchan Mellati, Nicolas Higel, Mathieu Boutonnet, Pierre Pasquier","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5","url":null,"abstract":"To reduce the number of deaths caused by exsanguination, the initial management of severe trauma aims to prevent, if not limit, the lethal triad, which consists of acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. Recently, several studies have suggested adding hypocalcemia to the lethal triad to form the lethal diamond, but the evidence supporting this change is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the lethal triad and lethal diamond for their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients receiving transfusion. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in TraumaBase®, a French database (2011–2023). The patients included in this study were all trauma patients who had received transfusions of at least 1 unit of red blood cells (RBCs) within the first 6 h of hospital admission and for whom ionized calcium measurements were available. Hypocalcemia was defined as an ionized calcium level < 1.1 mmol/L. A total of 2141 severe trauma patients were included (median age: 39, interquartile range [IQR]: 26–57; median injury severity score: 27, IQR: 17–41). Patients primarily presented with blunt trauma (81.7%), and a 24-h mortality rate of 16.1% was observed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed no significant difference in the association with 24-h mortality between the lethal diamond (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.71) and the lethal triad (AUC: 0.72) (p = 0.26). The strength of the association with 24-h mortality was similar between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond, with Cramer’s V values of 0.29 and 0.28, respectively. This study revealed no significant difference between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in terms of their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients requiring transfusion. These results raise questions about the independent role of hypocalcemia in early mortality.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142934875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00571-6
Ying Ma, Man Luo, Guoxin Guan, Xingming Liu, Xingye Cui, Fuwen Luo
Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is a serious clinical condition associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Machine learning (ML) has significant potential in addressing the diverse characteristics of real data. We aim to develop an explainable and cost-effective predictive model for GC utilizing ML and Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) algorithm. This study included a total of 1006 patients with 26 clinical features. Through 5-fold CV, the best performing integrated learning model, XGBoost, was identified. The model was interpreted using SHAP to derive the feature subsets WBC, NLR, D-dimer, Gallbladder width, Fibrinogen, Gallbladder wallness, Hypokalemia or hyponatremia, these subsets comprised the final diagnostic prediction model. The study developed a explainable predictive tool for GC at an early stage. This could assist doctors to make quick surgical intervention decisions and perform surgery on patients with GC as soon as possible. Using clinical data from 1006 cholecystitis patients, we developed a machine learning-based diagnostic prediction model to help identify patients at high risk for acute gangrenous cholecystitis. During the study, the deficiency and imbalance of actual clinical data were directly addressed, leading to the ultimate selection of the integrated learning model XGBoost as the predictive model exhibiting superior performance and stability on a novel, unidentified validation set and compared to preoperative clinical diagnosis. The model employs variables that are non-specific, readily available, reasonably priced, and appropriate for clinical generalization.
{"title":"An explainable predictive machine learning model of gangrenous cholecystitis based on clinical data: a retrospective single center study","authors":"Ying Ma, Man Luo, Guoxin Guan, Xingming Liu, Xingye Cui, Fuwen Luo","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00571-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00571-6","url":null,"abstract":"Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is a serious clinical condition associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Machine learning (ML) has significant potential in addressing the diverse characteristics of real data. We aim to develop an explainable and cost-effective predictive model for GC utilizing ML and Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) algorithm. This study included a total of 1006 patients with 26 clinical features. Through 5-fold CV, the best performing integrated learning model, XGBoost, was identified. The model was interpreted using SHAP to derive the feature subsets WBC, NLR, D-dimer, Gallbladder width, Fibrinogen, Gallbladder wallness, Hypokalemia or hyponatremia, these subsets comprised the final diagnostic prediction model. The study developed a explainable predictive tool for GC at an early stage. This could assist doctors to make quick surgical intervention decisions and perform surgery on patients with GC as soon as possible. Using clinical data from 1006 cholecystitis patients, we developed a machine learning-based diagnostic prediction model to help identify patients at high risk for acute gangrenous cholecystitis. During the study, the deficiency and imbalance of actual clinical data were directly addressed, leading to the ultimate selection of the integrated learning model XGBoost as the predictive model exhibiting superior performance and stability on a novel, unidentified validation set and compared to preoperative clinical diagnosis. The model employs variables that are non-specific, readily available, reasonably priced, and appropriate for clinical generalization.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142929094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00570-7
Anoeska Schipper, Peter Belgers, Rory O’Connor, Kim Ellis Jie, Robin Dooijes, Joeran Sander Bosma, Steef Kurstjens, Ron Kusters, Bram van Ginneken, Matthieu Rutten
Acute abdominal pain (AAP) constitutes 5–10% of all emergency department (ED) visits, with appendicitis being a prevalent AAP etiology often necessitating surgical intervention. The variability in AAP symptoms and causes, combined with the challenge of identifying appendicitis, complicate timely intervention. To estimate the risk of appendicitis, scoring systems such as the Alvarado score have been developed. However, diagnostic errors and delays remain common. Although various machine learning (ML) models have been proposed to enhance appendicitis detection, none have been seamlessly integrated into the ED workflows for AAP or are specifically designed to diagnose appendicitis as early as possible within the clinical decision-making process. To mimic daily clinical practice, this proof-of-concept study aims to develop ML models that support decision-making using comprehensive clinical data up to key decision points in the ED workflow to detect appendicitis in patients presenting with AAP. Data from the Dutch triage system at the ED, vital signs, complete medical history and physical examination findings and routine laboratory test results were retrospectively extracted from 350 AAP patients presenting to the ED of a Dutch teaching hospital from 2016 to 2023. Two eXtreme Gradient Boosting ML models were developed to differentiate cases with appendicitis from other AAP causes: one model used all data up to and including physical examination, and the other was extended with routine laboratory test results. The performance of both models was evaluated on a validation set (n = 68) and compared to the Alvarado scoring system as well as three ED physicians in a reader study. The ML models achieved AUROCs of 0.919 without laboratory test results and 0.923 with the addition of laboratory test results. The Alvarado scoring system attained an AUROC of 0.824. ED physicians achieved AUROCs of 0.894, 0.826, and 0.791 without laboratory test results, increasing to AUROCs of 0.923, 0.892, and 0.859 with laboratory test results. Both ML models demonstrated comparable high accuracy in predicting appendicitis in patients with AAP, outperforming the Alvarado scoring system. The ML models matched or surpassed ED physician performance in detecting appendicitis, with the largest potential performance gain observed in absence of laboratory test results. Integration could assist ED physicians in early and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis.
{"title":"Machine-learning based prediction of appendicitis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department","authors":"Anoeska Schipper, Peter Belgers, Rory O’Connor, Kim Ellis Jie, Robin Dooijes, Joeran Sander Bosma, Steef Kurstjens, Ron Kusters, Bram van Ginneken, Matthieu Rutten","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00570-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00570-7","url":null,"abstract":"Acute abdominal pain (AAP) constitutes 5–10% of all emergency department (ED) visits, with appendicitis being a prevalent AAP etiology often necessitating surgical intervention. The variability in AAP symptoms and causes, combined with the challenge of identifying appendicitis, complicate timely intervention. To estimate the risk of appendicitis, scoring systems such as the Alvarado score have been developed. However, diagnostic errors and delays remain common. Although various machine learning (ML) models have been proposed to enhance appendicitis detection, none have been seamlessly integrated into the ED workflows for AAP or are specifically designed to diagnose appendicitis as early as possible within the clinical decision-making process. To mimic daily clinical practice, this proof-of-concept study aims to develop ML models that support decision-making using comprehensive clinical data up to key decision points in the ED workflow to detect appendicitis in patients presenting with AAP. Data from the Dutch triage system at the ED, vital signs, complete medical history and physical examination findings and routine laboratory test results were retrospectively extracted from 350 AAP patients presenting to the ED of a Dutch teaching hospital from 2016 to 2023. Two eXtreme Gradient Boosting ML models were developed to differentiate cases with appendicitis from other AAP causes: one model used all data up to and including physical examination, and the other was extended with routine laboratory test results. The performance of both models was evaluated on a validation set (n = 68) and compared to the Alvarado scoring system as well as three ED physicians in a reader study. The ML models achieved AUROCs of 0.919 without laboratory test results and 0.923 with the addition of laboratory test results. The Alvarado scoring system attained an AUROC of 0.824. ED physicians achieved AUROCs of 0.894, 0.826, and 0.791 without laboratory test results, increasing to AUROCs of 0.923, 0.892, and 0.859 with laboratory test results. Both ML models demonstrated comparable high accuracy in predicting appendicitis in patients with AAP, outperforming the Alvarado scoring system. The ML models matched or surpassed ED physician performance in detecting appendicitis, with the largest potential performance gain observed in absence of laboratory test results. Integration could assist ED physicians in early and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis. ","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-29DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00564-5
Prashant Nasa, Robert D Wise, Marije Smit, Stefan Acosta, Scott D'Amours, William Beaubien-Souligny, Zsolt Bodnar, Federico Coccolini, Neha S Dangayach, Wojciech Dabrowski, Juan Duchesne, Janeth C Ejike, Goran Augustin, Bart De Keulenaer, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Ashish K Khanna, Edward Kimball, Abhilash Koratala, Rosemary K Lee, Ari Leppaniemi, Edgar V Lerma, Valerie Marmolejo, Alejando Meraz-Munoz, Sheila N Myatra, Daniel Niven, Claudia Olvera, Carlos Ordoñez, Clayton Petro, Bruno M Pereira, Claudio Ronco, Adrian Regli, Derek J Roberts, Philippe Rola, Michael Rosen, Gentle S Shrestha, Michael Sugrue, Juan Carlos Q Velez, Ron Wald, Jan De Waele, Annika Reintam Blaser, Manu L N G Malbrain
Background: The Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS) established consensus definitions and recommendations for the management of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in 2006, and they were last updated in 2013. The WSACS conducted an international survey between 2022 and 2023 to seek the agreement of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) worldwide on current and new candidate statements that may be used for future guidelines.
Methods: A self-administered, online cross-sectional survey was conducted under the auspices of the WSACS to assess the level of agreement among HCPs over current and new candidate statements. The survey, distributed electronically worldwide, collected agreement or disagreement with statements on the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), pathophysiology, definitions, and management of IAH/ACS. Statistical analysis assessed agreement levels, expressed in percentages, on statements among respondents, and comparisons between groups were performed according to the respondent's education status, base specialty, duration of work experience, role (intensivist vs non-intensivist) and involvement in previous guidelines. Agreement was considered to be reached when 80% or more of the respondents agreed with a particular statement.
Results: A total of 1042 respondents from 102 countries, predominantly physicians (73%), of whom 48% were intensivists, participated. Only 59% of HCPs were aware of the 2013 WSACS guidelines, and 41% incorporated them into practice. Despite agreement in most statements, significant variability existed. Notably, agreement was not reached on four new candidate statements: "normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is 10 mmHg in critically ill adults" (77%), "clinical assessment and estimation of IAP is inaccurate" (65.2%), "intragastric can be an alternative to the intravesical route for IAP measurement" (70.4%), and "measurement of IAP should be repeated in the resting position after measurement in a supine position" (71.9%). The survey elucidated nuances in clinical practice and highlighted areas for further education and standardization.
Conclusion: More than ten years after the last published guidelines, this worldwide cross-sectional survey collected feedback and evaluated the level of agreement with current recommendations and new candidate statements. This will inform the consensus process for future guideline development.
{"title":"International cross-sectional survey on current and updated definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.","authors":"Prashant Nasa, Robert D Wise, Marije Smit, Stefan Acosta, Scott D'Amours, William Beaubien-Souligny, Zsolt Bodnar, Federico Coccolini, Neha S Dangayach, Wojciech Dabrowski, Juan Duchesne, Janeth C Ejike, Goran Augustin, Bart De Keulenaer, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Ashish K Khanna, Edward Kimball, Abhilash Koratala, Rosemary K Lee, Ari Leppaniemi, Edgar V Lerma, Valerie Marmolejo, Alejando Meraz-Munoz, Sheila N Myatra, Daniel Niven, Claudia Olvera, Carlos Ordoñez, Clayton Petro, Bruno M Pereira, Claudio Ronco, Adrian Regli, Derek J Roberts, Philippe Rola, Michael Rosen, Gentle S Shrestha, Michael Sugrue, Juan Carlos Q Velez, Ron Wald, Jan De Waele, Annika Reintam Blaser, Manu L N G Malbrain","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00564-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13017-024-00564-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS) established consensus definitions and recommendations for the management of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in 2006, and they were last updated in 2013. The WSACS conducted an international survey between 2022 and 2023 to seek the agreement of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) worldwide on current and new candidate statements that may be used for future guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered, online cross-sectional survey was conducted under the auspices of the WSACS to assess the level of agreement among HCPs over current and new candidate statements. The survey, distributed electronically worldwide, collected agreement or disagreement with statements on the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), pathophysiology, definitions, and management of IAH/ACS. Statistical analysis assessed agreement levels, expressed in percentages, on statements among respondents, and comparisons between groups were performed according to the respondent's education status, base specialty, duration of work experience, role (intensivist vs non-intensivist) and involvement in previous guidelines. Agreement was considered to be reached when 80% or more of the respondents agreed with a particular statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1042 respondents from 102 countries, predominantly physicians (73%), of whom 48% were intensivists, participated. Only 59% of HCPs were aware of the 2013 WSACS guidelines, and 41% incorporated them into practice. Despite agreement in most statements, significant variability existed. Notably, agreement was not reached on four new candidate statements: \"normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is 10 mmHg in critically ill adults\" (77%), \"clinical assessment and estimation of IAP is inaccurate\" (65.2%), \"intragastric can be an alternative to the intravesical route for IAP measurement\" (70.4%), and \"measurement of IAP should be repeated in the resting position after measurement in a supine position\" (71.9%). The survey elucidated nuances in clinical practice and highlighted areas for further education and standardization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than ten years after the last published guidelines, this worldwide cross-sectional survey collected feedback and evaluated the level of agreement with current recommendations and new candidate statements. This will inform the consensus process for future guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605967/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142752063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}