首页 > 最新文献

World Journal of Emergency Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Correction: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1
Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Fredric M. Pieracci, Zsolt J. Balogh, Raul Coimbra, Joseph M. Galante, Andreas Hecker, Dieter Weber, Zachary M. Bauman, Susan Kartiko, Bhavik Patel, SarahAnn S. Whitbeck, Thomas W. White, Kevin N. Harrell, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Brian Tian, Francesco Amico, Solomon G. Beka, Luigi Bonavina, Marco Ceresoli, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Federico Coccolini, Yunfeng Cui, Francesca Dal Mas, Belinda De Simone, Isidoro Di Carlo, Salomone Di Saverio, Agron Dogjani, Andreas Fette, Gustavo P. Fraga, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Jim S. Khan, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vitor F. Kruger, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, Andrea Mingoli, David Costa Navarro, Eliseo Passera, Michele Pisano, Mauro Podda, Emanuele Russo, Boris Sakakushev, Domenico Santonastaso, Massimo Sartelli, Vishal G. Shelat, Edward Tan, Imtiaz Wani, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Walter L. Biffl, Ian Civil, Rifat Latifi, Ingo Marzi, Edoardo Picetti, Manos Pikoulis, Vanni Agnoletti, Francesca Bravi, Carlo Vall..
<p><b>Correction to: World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33</b></p><p><b>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2</b>.</p><p>The original publication of this article [1] contained an incorrect affiliation for author Imtiaz Wani. The incorrect and correct information is listed in this correction article; the original article has been updated.</p><p>Incorrect</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India</p><p>Correct</p><p>Imtiaz Wani</p><p>43. Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, India</p><ol data-track-component="outbound reference" data-track-context="references section"><li data-counter="1."><p>Sermonesi G, Bertelli R, Pieracci FM. et al. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.</p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden="true" focusable="false" height="16" role="img" width="16"><use xlink:href="#icon-eds-i-download-medium" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"></use></svg></p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy</p><p>Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Emanuele Russo, Domenico Santonastaso, Vanni Agnoletti, Carlo Vallicelli & Fausto Catena</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA</p><p>Fredric M. Pieracci & Ernest E. Moore</p></li><li><p>Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia</p><p>Zsolt J. Balogh</p></li><li><p>Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA</p><p>Raul Coimbra</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA</p><p>Joseph M. Galante</p></li><li><p>Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany</p><p>Andreas Hecker</p></li><li><p>Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia</p><p>Dieter Weber</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA</p><p>Zachary M. Bauman</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA</p><p>Susan Kartiko</p></li><li><p>Division of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia</p><p>Bhavik Patel</p></li><li><p>Chest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>SarahAnn S. Whitbeck</p></li><li><p>Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA</p><p>Thomas W. White</p></li><li><p>Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USA</p><p>Kevin N. Ha
Correction to:World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.The 本文[1]最初发表时,作者Imtiaz Wani的单位有误。本更正文章列出了错误和正确的信息;原文已更新。IncorrectImtiaz Wani43.印度斯利那加,Sheri-Kashmir 医学院外科系CorrectImtiaz Wani43.Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper.2024; 19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.下载参考文献作者和工作单位意大利切塞纳 Maurizio Bufalini 医院普通和急诊外科、麻醉和重症监护室贾科莫-塞莫内西、里卡多-贝尔泰利、达尼埃莱-佩里纳、阿莱西亚-兰皮尼、埃马纽埃尔-鲁索、多梅尼科-桑托纳斯塔索、万尼-阿格诺莱蒂、卡罗-瓦利切利&amp; 福斯托-卡泰纳美国科罗拉多大学医学院外科系美国科罗拉多州丹佛市弗雷德里克-M.Pieracci &amp; Ernest E. Moore澳大利亚新南威尔士州纽卡斯尔市约翰-亨特医院和纽卡斯尔大学创伤学系Zsolt J. Balogh美国加利福尼亚州莫雷诺谷河滨大学卫生系统医疗中心比较效果和临床结果研究中心Aaul Coimbra美国加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校外科创伤和急症护理外科Joseph M. Galante美国加利福尼亚州萨克拉门托市加利福尼亚大学戴维斯分校外科创伤和急症护理外科急诊医学系M.Galante德国吉森大学医院普外科和胸外科急诊医学部Andreas Hecker澳大利亚珀斯皇家医院创伤外科Dieter Weber美国内布拉斯加州奥马哈市内布拉斯加大学医学中心外科Zachary M. Bauman美国内布拉斯加州奥马哈市内布拉斯加大学医学中心外科Department of Surgery.BaumanDepartment of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USASusan KartikoDivision of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, AustraliaBhavik PatelChest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USASarahAnn S.WhitbeckIntermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USAThomas W. WhiteDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USAKevin N. HarrellDepartment of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SingaporeBrian TianDiscipline of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, NSW, AustraliaFrancesco AmicoEthiopian Air Force Hospital, Bishoftu, Oromia, EthiopiaSolomon G. BekaDepartment of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.贝卡意大利米兰米兰大学 IRCCS Policlinico San Donato 外科学系路易吉-博纳维纳意大利蒙扎米兰比可卡大学医学和外科学系普通外科和急诊外科马可-切雷索利意大利帕维亚帕维亚大学 Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo 外科学系洛伦佐-科比安奇&amp;Luca AnsaloniCollegium Medicum, University of Social Sciences, Lodz, PolandLorenzo Cobianchi &amp;Francesca Dal Mas意大利比萨,比萨大学医院普通、急诊和创伤外科Federico Coccolini天津医科大学南开临床医学院天津南开医院外科,天津、意大利里米尼 Infermi 医院微创急诊和普通外科 Belinda De Simone 外科科学和先进技术系、意大利卡塔尼亚卡塔尼亚大学 Cannizzaro 医院普外科Isidoro Di Carlo 意大利马尔凯大区圣贝内德托德尔特龙托医院普外科Salomone Di Saverio 地拉那医科大学普外科阿尔巴尼亚地拉那Agron DogjaniPediatric Surgery,Children's Care Center,SRH Klinikum Suhl,Suhl,Thueringen,GermanyAndreas FetteDivision of Trauma Surgery,School of Medical Sciences,University of Campinas,Campinas,BrazilGustavo P.Fraga &amp; Vitor F. KrugerFaculdade de Medicina, SUPREMA, Hospital Universitario Terezinha de Jesus de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, BrazilCarlos Augusto GomesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UKJim S. KhanDepartments of Surgery and Countermanship, Portsmouth, UKJim S. KrugerFaculdade de Medicina, SUPREMA.KirkpatrickAbdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandAri LeppäniemiDepartment of Surgical Diseases No.
{"title":"Correction: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper","authors":"Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Fredric M. Pieracci, Zsolt J. Balogh, Raul Coimbra, Joseph M. Galante, Andreas Hecker, Dieter Weber, Zachary M. Bauman, Susan Kartiko, Bhavik Patel, SarahAnn S. Whitbeck, Thomas W. White, Kevin N. Harrell, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Brian Tian, Francesco Amico, Solomon G. Beka, Luigi Bonavina, Marco Ceresoli, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Federico Coccolini, Yunfeng Cui, Francesca Dal Mas, Belinda De Simone, Isidoro Di Carlo, Salomone Di Saverio, Agron Dogjani, Andreas Fette, Gustavo P. Fraga, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Jim S. Khan, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Vitor F. Kruger, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, Andrea Mingoli, David Costa Navarro, Eliseo Passera, Michele Pisano, Mauro Podda, Emanuele Russo, Boris Sakakushev, Domenico Santonastaso, Massimo Sartelli, Vishal G. Shelat, Edward Tan, Imtiaz Wani, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Walter L. Biffl, Ian Civil, Rifat Latifi, Ingo Marzi, Edoardo Picetti, Manos Pikoulis, Vanni Agnoletti, Francesca Bravi, Carlo Vall..","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00568-1","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Correction to: World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2024) 19:33&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The original publication of this article [1] contained an incorrect affiliation for author Imtiaz Wani. The incorrect and correct information is listed in this correction article; the original article has been updated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Incorrect&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Imtiaz Wani&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;43. Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Correct&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Imtiaz Wani&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;43. Government Gousia Hospital, Srinagar, India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol data-track-component=\"outbound reference\" data-track-context=\"references section\"&gt;&lt;li data-counter=\"1.\"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sermonesi G, Bertelli R, Pieracci FM. et al. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;Download references&lt;svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"&gt;&lt;use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"&gt;&lt;/use&gt;&lt;/svg&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Authors and Affiliations&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Giacomo Sermonesi, Riccardo Bertelli, Daniele Perrina, Alessia Rampini, Emanuele Russo, Domenico Santonastaso, Vanni Agnoletti, Carlo Vallicelli &amp; Fausto Catena&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fredric M. Pieracci &amp; Ernest E. Moore&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Zsolt J. Balogh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Raul Coimbra&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joseph M. Galante&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andreas Hecker&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dieter Weber&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Zachary M. Bauman&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Susan Kartiko&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Division of Trauma, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bhavik Patel&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chest Wall Injury Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SarahAnn S. Whitbeck&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thomas W. White&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kevin N. Ha","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143054997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility and accuracy of continuous intraabdominal pressure monitoring with a capsular device in human pilot trial
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0
Chien-Hung Liao, David A. Spain, Chih-Chi Chen, Chi-Tung Cheng, Wei-Cheng Lin, Dong-Ru Ho, Heng-Fu Lin, Fausto Catena
Intrabdominal pressure (IAP) is an important parameter. Elevated IAP can reduce visceral perfusion, lead to intraabdominal hypertension, and result in life-threatening abdominal compartment syndrome. While ingestible capsular devices have been used for various abdominal diagnoses, their application in continuous IAP monitoring remains unproven. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of IAP measurement using a digital capsule PressureDOT, an ingestible capsule equipped with wireless transmission capability and a pressure sensor, then compared its reliability with conventional intravesical method. Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgeries were recruited. During surgery, we created pneumoperitoneum by inflating CO2 into the peritoneal cavity and IAP was simultaneously monitored using both the ingestible capsules and intravesical measurements from Foley catheter. We assessed the feasibility of signal transmission and the accuracy of pressure measurements. Six patients were enrolled in this pilot study. No adverse events were reported, and the average first-intake time was within 24 h. All capsules were successfully expelled, with an average excretion time of 81 h. In the summarized data, the mean IAPdot is 0.6 mmHg lower than the IAPivp, with a standard deviation of 1.68 mmHg. However, capsule measurements showed excellent correlation with intravesical IAP measurements, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.8821–0.9320). Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using digital capsules for continuous IAP monitoring, providing the agreement between IAP measurements from digital capsules and conventional intravesical measurement within a near-normal pressure.
{"title":"Feasibility and accuracy of continuous intraabdominal pressure monitoring with a capsular device in human pilot trial","authors":"Chien-Hung Liao, David A. Spain, Chih-Chi Chen, Chi-Tung Cheng, Wei-Cheng Lin, Dong-Ru Ho, Heng-Fu Lin, Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00569-0","url":null,"abstract":"Intrabdominal pressure (IAP) is an important parameter. Elevated IAP can reduce visceral perfusion, lead to intraabdominal hypertension, and result in life-threatening abdominal compartment syndrome. While ingestible capsular devices have been used for various abdominal diagnoses, their application in continuous IAP monitoring remains unproven. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of IAP measurement using a digital capsule PressureDOT, an ingestible capsule equipped with wireless transmission capability and a pressure sensor, then compared its reliability with conventional intravesical method. Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgeries were recruited. During surgery, we created pneumoperitoneum by inflating CO2 into the peritoneal cavity and IAP was simultaneously monitored using both the ingestible capsules and intravesical measurements from Foley catheter. We assessed the feasibility of signal transmission and the accuracy of pressure measurements. Six patients were enrolled in this pilot study. No adverse events were reported, and the average first-intake time was within 24 h. All capsules were successfully expelled, with an average excretion time of 81 h. In the summarized data, the mean IAPdot is 0.6 mmHg lower than the IAPivp, with a standard deviation of 1.68 mmHg. However, capsule measurements showed excellent correlation with intravesical IAP measurements, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.8821–0.9320). Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of using digital capsules for continuous IAP monitoring, providing the agreement between IAP measurements from digital capsules and conventional intravesical measurement within a near-normal pressure.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143044100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Uterine artery embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage 子宫动脉栓塞术在产后出血治疗中的应用
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z
Hassan Elbiss, Shamsa Al Awar, Jamal Koteesh, Howaida Khair, Sara Maki, Dana H. Abdalla, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality causing one-fourth of all maternal deaths. We aimed to study the role of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in controlling PPH and its impact on the need for hysterectomy. We studied patients who were diagnosed with primary PPH between February 2012 and March 2020 at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing interventional radiology via UAE. Logistic regression analysis was done to define the factors that predict the need for emergency UAE. Out of 79 patients who had elective (n = 53) or emergency (n = 26) embolization, the placenta previa accreta (69.8% vs. 23.1%) and placenta previa (24.4% vs. 3.8%) were the common indications for elective versus emergency UAE (p < 0.001). The indication for UAE was the most significant factor for predicting an emergency procedure (p = 0.002) with placenta previa being significantly different from other indications (p < 0.001). Bleeding stopped in 78/79 patients (success rate of 98.7%) following UAE. Those who failed stopping of the bleeding were similar between the elective and emergency IR, (1/53 (1.9%) compared with 0/26 (0%), p = 0.99 Fisher’s Exact test). Overall, eight patients (10%) had hysterectomy, one of them was needed as the final solution to stop bleeding. There were no maternal deaths. Interventional radiological UAE is very efficient in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. It should be recommended as the first line of treatment for significant bleeding when expertise and facilities are available. It increases survival, reduces hysterectomy rate, without a difference if done as an emergency or elective procedure.
产后出血是孕产妇发病和死亡的主要可预防原因之一,占孕产妇死亡总数的四分之一。我们的目的是研究子宫动脉栓塞(UAE)在控制PPH中的作用及其对子宫切除术需求的影响。我们研究了2012年2月至2020年3月在阿拉伯联合酋长国Al Ain医院被诊断为原发性PPH的患者。我们研究了经阿联酋行介入放射治疗的患者的特点和预后。进行了Logistic回归分析,以确定预测紧急UAE需求的因素。在79例选择性栓塞(n = 53)或急诊栓塞(n = 26)的患者中,前置胎盘增生(69.8%对23.1%)和前置胎盘(24.4%对3.8%)是选择性UAE和急诊UAE的常见适应症(p < 0.001)。UAE的适应症是预测紧急手术的最重要因素(p = 0.002),前置胎盘与其他适应症有显著差异(p < 0.001)。79例患者中78例出血停止(成功率98.7%)。在择期和紧急IR中,止血失败的患者相似,(1/53(1.9%)与0/26(0%)相比,p = 0.99 Fisher 's Exact检验)。总体而言,8例患者(10%)进行了子宫切除术,其中1例需要作为止血的最终解决方案。没有产妇死亡。介入放射UAE治疗产后出血疗效显著。在具备专业知识和设施的情况下,应建议将其作为治疗大出血的第一线。它增加了生存率,降低了子宫切除术率,如果作为紧急手术或选择性手术,没有区别。
{"title":"Uterine artery embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage","authors":"Hassan Elbiss, Shamsa Al Awar, Jamal Koteesh, Howaida Khair, Sara Maki, Dana H. Abdalla, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z","url":null,"abstract":"Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality causing one-fourth of all maternal deaths. We aimed to study the role of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in controlling PPH and its impact on the need for hysterectomy. We studied patients who were diagnosed with primary PPH between February 2012 and March 2020 at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing interventional radiology via UAE. Logistic regression analysis was done to define the factors that predict the need for emergency UAE. Out of 79 patients who had elective (n = 53) or emergency (n = 26) embolization, the placenta previa accreta (69.8% vs. 23.1%) and placenta previa (24.4% vs. 3.8%) were the common indications for elective versus emergency UAE (p < 0.001). The indication for UAE was the most significant factor for predicting an emergency procedure (p = 0.002) with placenta previa being significantly different from other indications (p < 0.001). Bleeding stopped in 78/79 patients (success rate of 98.7%) following UAE. Those who failed stopping of the bleeding were similar between the elective and emergency IR, (1/53 (1.9%) compared with 0/26 (0%), p = 0.99 Fisher’s Exact test). Overall, eight patients (10%) had hysterectomy, one of them was needed as the final solution to stop bleeding. There were no maternal deaths. Interventional radiological UAE is very efficient in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. It should be recommended as the first line of treatment for significant bleeding when expertise and facilities are available. It increases survival, reduces hysterectomy rate, without a difference if done as an emergency or elective procedure.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143020690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating acute care surgery in South Korea: enhancing trauma and non-trauma emergency care 在韩国整合急症护理外科:加强创伤和非创伤急诊护理
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7
Jin Young Lee, Seheon Kim, Jin Bong Ye, Jin Suk Lee, Younghoon Sul
Trauma surgery is a fundamental aspect of medicine. According to the 2023 mortality report from Statistics Korea, external factors such as intentional self-harm and transportation incidents are leading causes of death among individuals aged 10 to 30, accounting for 7.9% of overall mortality. Despite advances in the field, specialization has hindered comprehensive trauma care. In South Korea, regional trauma centers have been established to meet critical trauma management needs; however, challenges remain, including a shortage of trauma surgeons and inefficient resource utilization. The reluctance of surgical residents to pursue trauma training exacerbates the scarcity of qualified specialists. Trauma surgeons often bear extensive responsibilities, which limits their ability to perform prompt interventions. Acute Care Surgery (ACS) offers a model to integrate trauma and non-trauma surgical care, enabling hospitals to implement effective protocols for urgent cases and improving patient outcomes. Research indicates that ACS enhances emergency surgical management, increases training opportunities for residents, and improves job satisfaction among participating surgeons. Integrating ACS into South Korea’s healthcare system is essential to optimize resource allocation and improve emergency care, ultimately leading to enhanced public health outcomes.
创伤外科是医学的一个基本方面。根据韩国统计局发布的 2023 年死亡率报告,故意自残和交通事故等外部因素是 10 至 30 岁人群的主要死因,占总死亡率的 7.9%。尽管该领域取得了进步,但专业化阻碍了全面的创伤护理。韩国建立了地区创伤中心,以满足重要的创伤管理需求;然而,挑战依然存在,包括创伤外科医生短缺和资源利用效率低下。外科住院医师不愿接受创伤培训,加剧了合格专科医生的稀缺。创伤外科医生往往承担着广泛的责任,这限制了他们进行及时干预的能力。急诊外科(ACS)提供了一种整合创伤和非创伤外科护理的模式,使医院能够对紧急病例实施有效的治疗方案,并改善患者的治疗效果。研究表明,ACS 加强了急诊外科管理,增加了住院医生的培训机会,提高了参与外科医生的工作满意度。将 ACS 纳入韩国的医疗保健系统对于优化资源分配和改善急诊护理至关重要,最终可提高公共卫生成果。
{"title":"Integrating acute care surgery in South Korea: enhancing trauma and non-trauma emergency care","authors":"Jin Young Lee, Seheon Kim, Jin Bong Ye, Jin Suk Lee, Younghoon Sul","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00578-7","url":null,"abstract":"Trauma surgery is a fundamental aspect of medicine. According to the 2023 mortality report from Statistics Korea, external factors such as intentional self-harm and transportation incidents are leading causes of death among individuals aged 10 to 30, accounting for 7.9% of overall mortality. Despite advances in the field, specialization has hindered comprehensive trauma care. In South Korea, regional trauma centers have been established to meet critical trauma management needs; however, challenges remain, including a shortage of trauma surgeons and inefficient resource utilization. The reluctance of surgical residents to pursue trauma training exacerbates the scarcity of qualified specialists. Trauma surgeons often bear extensive responsibilities, which limits their ability to perform prompt interventions. Acute Care Surgery (ACS) offers a model to integrate trauma and non-trauma surgical care, enabling hospitals to implement effective protocols for urgent cases and improving patient outcomes. Research indicates that ACS enhances emergency surgical management, increases training opportunities for residents, and improves job satisfaction among participating surgeons. Integrating ACS into South Korea’s healthcare system is essential to optimize resource allocation and improve emergency care, ultimately leading to enhanced public health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142990061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global perspectives in acute and emergency general surgery in low and middle-income countries: a WSES project protocol for scoping review on global surgery 低收入和中等收入国家急症和急诊普通外科手术的全球视角:全球外科手术范围审查的WSES项目方案
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9
Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Arda Isik, Fausto Rosa, Diego Visconti, Taras Nechay, Sharfuddin Chowdhury, Abdourahmane Ndong, Tushar S. Mishra, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Francesco Piscioneri, Edward C.T.H. Tan
Around five billion people globally lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical facilities and care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global initiatives have been launched, including efforts led by organizations. Also, regional efforts have shed light on the unique challenges faced by different areas within LMICs. Despite these efforts, many countries still face significant challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited availability of trained surgical personnel, lack of essential medical equipment, and insufficient financial resources allocated to healthcare and their related possible factors. Here is that we aim to identify the progress made in areas such as capacity building, training programs, infrastructure development, and policy reforms, as well as highlight the gaps that persist, providing a foundation for future research. Such a comprehensive scoping review will be crucial to enhance surgical care services and ultimately improve health outcomes in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search up to November 2024 will be conducted across six major databases. PubMed, Scopus, Ovoid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database. The methodology will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. The first version of this project will not include a quality appraisal.
在低收入和中等收入国家,全球约有50亿人无法获得安全、及时和负担得起的手术设施和护理。全球倡议已经启动,包括由各组织领导的努力。此外,区域努力揭示了中低收入国家不同地区面临的独特挑战。尽管作出了这些努力,但许多国家仍然面临重大挑战,包括基础设施不足、训练有素的外科人员有限、缺乏基本医疗设备、分配给保健及其相关可能因素的财政资源不足。我们的目标是确定在能力建设、培训计划、基础设施发展和政策改革等领域取得的进展,并强调仍然存在的差距,为未来的研究奠定基础。这种全面的范围审查对于加强外科护理服务并最终改善中低收入国家的健康结果至关重要。截止到2024年11月,将在6个主要数据库中进行全面的文献检索。PubMed、Scopus、Ovoid、Web of Science、Cochrane Central、CNKI数据库。方法将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)清单的首选报告项目。这个项目的第一个版本将不包括质量评估。
{"title":"Global perspectives in acute and emergency general surgery in low and middle-income countries: a WSES project protocol for scoping review on global surgery","authors":"Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Arda Isik, Fausto Rosa, Diego Visconti, Taras Nechay, Sharfuddin Chowdhury, Abdourahmane Ndong, Tushar S. Mishra, Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Francesco Piscioneri, Edward C.T.H. Tan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00576-9","url":null,"abstract":"Around five billion people globally lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical facilities and care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Global initiatives have been launched, including efforts led by organizations. Also, regional efforts have shed light on the unique challenges faced by different areas within LMICs. Despite these efforts, many countries still face significant challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited availability of trained surgical personnel, lack of essential medical equipment, and insufficient financial resources allocated to healthcare and their related possible factors. Here is that we aim to identify the progress made in areas such as capacity building, training programs, infrastructure development, and policy reforms, as well as highlight the gaps that persist, providing a foundation for future research. Such a comprehensive scoping review will be crucial to enhance surgical care services and ultimately improve health outcomes in LMICs. A comprehensive literature search up to November 2024 will be conducted across six major databases. PubMed, Scopus, Ovoid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) database. The methodology will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. The first version of this project will not include a quality appraisal.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142940300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pre-operative antibiotics in patients with acute mild cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it really useful? A systematic review 急性轻度胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术前抗生素:真的有用吗?系统回顾
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x
Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Isabella Van-Londoño, Antonio Pesce
Empirical antibiotic therapy is often initiated during the hospital stay while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach is generally justified in patients with moderate (Tokyo II) and severe (Tokyo III) acute cholecystitis, where organ dysfunction occurs as a result of the inflammatory or infectious process. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the use of antibiotics in patients with mild (Tokyo I) cholecystitis. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative antibiotic use on outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies evaluating the use or non-use of preoperative antibiotics in patients with acute cholecystitis. Eligible studies were required to provide at least one of the following datasets: postoperative complication rate, postoperative infectious complication rate, or positive culture rate. The synthesis reports were prepared using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework. A total of 622 articles were initially identified, of which 2 met the inclusion criteria. These two articles included 331 patients. They reported higher rates of postoperative complications and bacterobilia in the group that received preoperative antibiotics; however, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Based on current evidence, no recommendation can be made regarding the therapeutic use of antibiotics in mild acute cholecystitis while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
经验性抗生素治疗通常在住院等待腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间开始。这种方法通常适用于中度(东京II型)和重度(东京III型)急性胆囊炎患者,其中器官功能障碍是炎症或感染过程的结果。然而,对于轻度(东京ⅰ型)胆囊炎患者使用抗生素尚无明确的共识。本研究旨在评估术前抗生素使用对急性胆囊炎患者预后的影响。采用PRISMA方法对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane进行了系统评价。评价急性胆囊炎患者术前使用或不使用抗生素的随机对照试验或非随机比较研究符合纳入条件。符合条件的研究需要提供以下数据集中的至少一项:术后并发症率、术后感染并发症率或阳性培养率。综合报告采用无meta分析的综合(SWiM)框架编写。最初共确定了622件物品,其中2件符合纳入标准。这两篇文章纳入了331例患者。他们报告说,术前接受抗生素治疗的组术后并发症和胆管菌的发生率更高;但差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。根据目前的证据,对于等待腹腔镜胆囊切除术的轻度急性胆囊炎患者使用抗生素治疗尚无建议。
{"title":"Pre-operative antibiotics in patients with acute mild cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it really useful? A systematic review","authors":"Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Isabella Van-Londoño, Antonio Pesce","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00574-x","url":null,"abstract":"Empirical antibiotic therapy is often initiated during the hospital stay while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach is generally justified in patients with moderate (Tokyo II) and severe (Tokyo III) acute cholecystitis, where organ dysfunction occurs as a result of the inflammatory or infectious process. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the use of antibiotics in patients with mild (Tokyo I) cholecystitis. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative antibiotic use on outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was conducted following the PRISMA methodology. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies evaluating the use or non-use of preoperative antibiotics in patients with acute cholecystitis. Eligible studies were required to provide at least one of the following datasets: postoperative complication rate, postoperative infectious complication rate, or positive culture rate. The synthesis reports were prepared using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework. A total of 622 articles were initially identified, of which 2 met the inclusion criteria. These two articles included 331 patients. They reported higher rates of postoperative complications and bacterobilia in the group that received preoperative antibiotics; however, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Based on current evidence, no recommendation can be made regarding the therapeutic use of antibiotics in mild acute cholecystitis while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142940358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in severe trauma patients: a multicenter cohort 严重创伤患者致死性三联体和致死性菱形的比较:一个多中心队列
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5
Charles Dupuy, Thibault Martinez, Olivier Duranteau, Tobias Gauss, Natacha Kapandji, Jean Pasqueron, Mathilde Holleville, Georges Abi Abdallah, Anatole Harrois, Véronique Ramonda, Delphine Huet-Garrigue, Théophane Doublet, Marc Leone, Vincent Legros, Julien Pottecher, Gérard Audibert, Ingrid Millot, Benjamin Popoff, Benjamin Cohen, Fanny Vardon-Bounes, Mathieu Willig, Pierre Gosset, Emilie Angles, Nouchan Mellati, Nicolas Higel, Mathieu Boutonnet, Pierre Pasquier
To reduce the number of deaths caused by exsanguination, the initial management of severe trauma aims to prevent, if not limit, the lethal triad, which consists of acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. Recently, several studies have suggested adding hypocalcemia to the lethal triad to form the lethal diamond, but the evidence supporting this change is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the lethal triad and lethal diamond for their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients receiving transfusion. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in TraumaBase®, a French database (2011–2023). The patients included in this study were all trauma patients who had received transfusions of at least 1 unit of red blood cells (RBCs) within the first 6 h of hospital admission and for whom ionized calcium measurements were available. Hypocalcemia was defined as an ionized calcium level < 1.1 mmol/L. A total of 2141 severe trauma patients were included (median age: 39, interquartile range [IQR]: 26–57; median injury severity score: 27, IQR: 17–41). Patients primarily presented with blunt trauma (81.7%), and a 24-h mortality rate of 16.1% was observed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed no significant difference in the association with 24-h mortality between the lethal diamond (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.71) and the lethal triad (AUC: 0.72) (p = 0.26). The strength of the association with 24-h mortality was similar between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond, with Cramer’s V values of 0.29 and 0.28, respectively. This study revealed no significant difference between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in terms of their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients requiring transfusion. These results raise questions about the independent role of hypocalcemia in early mortality.
为了减少因失血过多而导致的死亡人数,严重创伤的初期处理旨在预防甚至限制致命三联症,即酸中毒、凝血病和低体温。最近,一些研究建议将低钙血症加入致命三联症,形成致命钻石,但支持这一改变的证据有限。因此,本研究旨在比较致死三联征和致死钻石各自与接受输血的严重创伤患者 24 小时死亡率的关系。我们对法国数据库 TraumaBase® 中的患者进行了多中心回顾性分析(2011-2023 年)。本研究纳入的患者是所有在入院后 6 小时内接受过至少 1 个单位红细胞(RBC)输血且可获得离子钙测量结果的创伤患者。低钙血症的定义是离子钙水平< 1.1 mmol/L。共纳入了 2141 名严重创伤患者(中位年龄:39 岁,四分位数间距 [IQR]:26-57;中位损伤严重程度评分:27 分,四分位数间距 [IQR]:17-41)。患者主要表现为钝性创伤(81.7%),24 小时死亡率为 16.1%。接收者操作特征曲线分析显示,致命钻石型(曲线下面积 [AUC]:0.71)和致命三联型(AUC:0.72)与 24 小时死亡率的关系无显著差异(P = 0.26)。致死三联型和致死菱形型与 24 小时死亡率的关联强度相似,Cramer's V 值分别为 0.29 和 0.28。这项研究表明,致命三联征和致命菱形征在各自与需要输血的严重创伤患者 24 小时死亡率的关联方面没有明显差异。这些结果提出了低钙血症在早期死亡率中的独立作用问题。
{"title":"Comparison of the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in severe trauma patients: a multicenter cohort","authors":"Charles Dupuy, Thibault Martinez, Olivier Duranteau, Tobias Gauss, Natacha Kapandji, Jean Pasqueron, Mathilde Holleville, Georges Abi Abdallah, Anatole Harrois, Véronique Ramonda, Delphine Huet-Garrigue, Théophane Doublet, Marc Leone, Vincent Legros, Julien Pottecher, Gérard Audibert, Ingrid Millot, Benjamin Popoff, Benjamin Cohen, Fanny Vardon-Bounes, Mathieu Willig, Pierre Gosset, Emilie Angles, Nouchan Mellati, Nicolas Higel, Mathieu Boutonnet, Pierre Pasquier","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5","url":null,"abstract":"To reduce the number of deaths caused by exsanguination, the initial management of severe trauma aims to prevent, if not limit, the lethal triad, which consists of acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia. Recently, several studies have suggested adding hypocalcemia to the lethal triad to form the lethal diamond, but the evidence supporting this change is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the lethal triad and lethal diamond for their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients receiving transfusion. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients in TraumaBase®, a French database (2011–2023). The patients included in this study were all trauma patients who had received transfusions of at least 1 unit of red blood cells (RBCs) within the first 6 h of hospital admission and for whom ionized calcium measurements were available. Hypocalcemia was defined as an ionized calcium level < 1.1 mmol/L. A total of 2141 severe trauma patients were included (median age: 39, interquartile range [IQR]: 26–57; median injury severity score: 27, IQR: 17–41). Patients primarily presented with blunt trauma (81.7%), and a 24-h mortality rate of 16.1% was observed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed no significant difference in the association with 24-h mortality between the lethal diamond (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.71) and the lethal triad (AUC: 0.72) (p = 0.26). The strength of the association with 24-h mortality was similar between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond, with Cramer’s V values of 0.29 and 0.28, respectively. This study revealed no significant difference between the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in terms of their respective associations with 24-h mortality in severe trauma patients requiring transfusion. These results raise questions about the independent role of hypocalcemia in early mortality.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142934875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An explainable predictive machine learning model of gangrenous cholecystitis based on clinical data: a retrospective single center study 基于临床数据的坏疽性胆囊炎可解释的预测机器学习模型:一项回顾性单中心研究
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00571-6
Ying Ma, Man Luo, Guoxin Guan, Xingming Liu, Xingye Cui, Fuwen Luo
Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is a serious clinical condition associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Machine learning (ML) has significant potential in addressing the diverse characteristics of real data. We aim to develop an explainable and cost-effective predictive model for GC utilizing ML and Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) algorithm. This study included a total of 1006 patients with 26 clinical features. Through 5-fold CV, the best performing integrated learning model, XGBoost, was identified. The model was interpreted using SHAP to derive the feature subsets WBC, NLR, D-dimer, Gallbladder width, Fibrinogen, Gallbladder wallness, Hypokalemia or hyponatremia, these subsets comprised the final diagnostic prediction model. The study developed a explainable predictive tool for GC at an early stage. This could assist doctors to make quick surgical intervention decisions and perform surgery on patients with GC as soon as possible. Using clinical data from 1006 cholecystitis patients, we developed a machine learning-based diagnostic prediction model to help identify patients at high risk for acute gangrenous cholecystitis. During the study, the deficiency and imbalance of actual clinical data were directly addressed, leading to the ultimate selection of the integrated learning model XGBoost as the predictive model exhibiting superior performance and stability on a novel, unidentified validation set and compared to preoperative clinical diagnosis. The model employs variables that are non-specific, readily available, reasonably priced, and appropriate for clinical generalization.
坏疽性胆囊炎(GC)是一种严重的临床疾病,发病率和死亡率都很高。机器学习(ML)在解决真实数据的各种特征方面具有巨大的潜力。我们的目标是利用ML和Shapley加性解释(SHAP)算法开发一个可解释且具有成本效益的GC预测模型。本研究共纳入1006例患者,共有26项临床特征。通过5倍CV,确定了表现最佳的综合学习模型XGBoost。使用SHAP对模型进行解释,得出WBC、NLR、d -二聚体、胆囊宽度、纤维蛋白原、胆囊壁厚、低钾血症或低钠血症的特征子集,这些子集组成了最终的诊断预测模型。该研究开发了一种可解释的早期GC预测工具。这有助于医生快速做出手术干预决策,尽早对胃癌患者进行手术治疗。利用1006例胆囊炎患者的临床数据,我们开发了一个基于机器学习的诊断预测模型,以帮助识别急性坏疽性胆囊炎的高风险患者。在研究过程中,直接解决了实际临床数据的不足和不平衡,最终选择了集成学习模型XGBoost作为预测模型,在一个新的、未知的验证集上,与术前临床诊断相比,具有更好的性能和稳定性。该模型采用非特异性、容易获得、价格合理、适合临床推广的变量。
{"title":"An explainable predictive machine learning model of gangrenous cholecystitis based on clinical data: a retrospective single center study","authors":"Ying Ma, Man Luo, Guoxin Guan, Xingming Liu, Xingye Cui, Fuwen Luo","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00571-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00571-6","url":null,"abstract":"Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is a serious clinical condition associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Machine learning (ML) has significant potential in addressing the diverse characteristics of real data. We aim to develop an explainable and cost-effective predictive model for GC utilizing ML and Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) algorithm. This study included a total of 1006 patients with 26 clinical features. Through 5-fold CV, the best performing integrated learning model, XGBoost, was identified. The model was interpreted using SHAP to derive the feature subsets WBC, NLR, D-dimer, Gallbladder width, Fibrinogen, Gallbladder wallness, Hypokalemia or hyponatremia, these subsets comprised the final diagnostic prediction model. The study developed a explainable predictive tool for GC at an early stage. This could assist doctors to make quick surgical intervention decisions and perform surgery on patients with GC as soon as possible. Using clinical data from 1006 cholecystitis patients, we developed a machine learning-based diagnostic prediction model to help identify patients at high risk for acute gangrenous cholecystitis. During the study, the deficiency and imbalance of actual clinical data were directly addressed, leading to the ultimate selection of the integrated learning model XGBoost as the predictive model exhibiting superior performance and stability on a novel, unidentified validation set and compared to preoperative clinical diagnosis. The model employs variables that are non-specific, readily available, reasonably priced, and appropriate for clinical generalization.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142929094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Machine-learning based prediction of appendicitis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department 急诊科急性腹痛患者阑尾炎的基于机器学习的预测
IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00570-7
Anoeska Schipper, Peter Belgers, Rory O’Connor, Kim Ellis Jie, Robin Dooijes, Joeran Sander Bosma, Steef Kurstjens, Ron Kusters, Bram van Ginneken, Matthieu Rutten
Acute abdominal pain (AAP) constitutes 5–10% of all emergency department (ED) visits, with appendicitis being a prevalent AAP etiology often necessitating surgical intervention. The variability in AAP symptoms and causes, combined with the challenge of identifying appendicitis, complicate timely intervention. To estimate the risk of appendicitis, scoring systems such as the Alvarado score have been developed. However, diagnostic errors and delays remain common. Although various machine learning (ML) models have been proposed to enhance appendicitis detection, none have been seamlessly integrated into the ED workflows for AAP or are specifically designed to diagnose appendicitis as early as possible within the clinical decision-making process. To mimic daily clinical practice, this proof-of-concept study aims to develop ML models that support decision-making using comprehensive clinical data up to key decision points in the ED workflow to detect appendicitis in patients presenting with AAP. Data from the Dutch triage system at the ED, vital signs, complete medical history and physical examination findings and routine laboratory test results were retrospectively extracted from 350 AAP patients presenting to the ED of a Dutch teaching hospital from 2016 to 2023. Two eXtreme Gradient Boosting ML models were developed to differentiate cases with appendicitis from other AAP causes: one model used all data up to and including physical examination, and the other was extended with routine laboratory test results. The performance of both models was evaluated on a validation set (n = 68) and compared to the Alvarado scoring system as well as three ED physicians in a reader study. The ML models achieved AUROCs of 0.919 without laboratory test results and 0.923 with the addition of laboratory test results. The Alvarado scoring system attained an AUROC of 0.824. ED physicians achieved AUROCs of 0.894, 0.826, and 0.791 without laboratory test results, increasing to AUROCs of 0.923, 0.892, and 0.859 with laboratory test results. Both ML models demonstrated comparable high accuracy in predicting appendicitis in patients with AAP, outperforming the Alvarado scoring system. The ML models matched or surpassed ED physician performance in detecting appendicitis, with the largest potential performance gain observed in absence of laboratory test results. Integration could assist ED physicians in early and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis.
急性腹痛(AAP)占所有急诊科(ED)就诊的5-10%,阑尾炎是常见的AAP病因,通常需要手术干预。AAP症状和病因的可变性,加上阑尾炎的识别挑战,使及时干预复杂化。为了估计阑尾炎的风险,已经开发了评分系统,如阿尔瓦拉多评分。然而,诊断错误和延误仍然很常见。尽管已经提出了各种机器学习(ML)模型来增强阑尾炎的检测,但没有一种模型能够无缝集成到AAP的ED工作流程中,或者专门设计用于在临床决策过程中尽早诊断阑尾炎。为了模拟日常临床实践,这项概念验证研究旨在开发ML模型,利用综合临床数据支持决策,直至ED工作流程中的关键决策点,以检测AAP患者的阑尾炎。从2016年至2023年在荷兰一家教学医院急诊科就诊的350名AAP患者中,回顾性地提取了荷兰急诊科分诊系统的数据、生命体征、完整的病史、体检结果和常规实验室检查结果。开发了两种极端梯度增强ML模型来区分阑尾炎与其他AAP原因:一种模型使用了包括体检在内的所有数据,另一种模型扩展了常规实验室检查结果。在验证集(n = 68)上对两种模型的性能进行了评估,并与Alvarado评分系统以及读者研究中的三位ED医生进行了比较。ML模型未加实验室检测结果的auroc为0.919,加实验室检测结果的auroc为0.923。Alvarado评分系统的AUROC为0.824。无实验室检测结果的急诊科医师auroc分别为0.894、0.826、0.791,有实验室检测结果的急诊科医师auroc分别为0.923、0.892、0.859。两种ML模型在预测AAP患者阑尾炎方面均表现出相当高的准确性,优于Alvarado评分系统。ML模型在检测阑尾炎方面匹配或超过了ED医生的表现,在没有实验室测试结果的情况下观察到最大的潜在性能增益。整合可以帮助急诊科医师早期准确诊断阑尾炎。
{"title":"Machine-learning based prediction of appendicitis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department","authors":"Anoeska Schipper, Peter Belgers, Rory O’Connor, Kim Ellis Jie, Robin Dooijes, Joeran Sander Bosma, Steef Kurstjens, Ron Kusters, Bram van Ginneken, Matthieu Rutten","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00570-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00570-7","url":null,"abstract":"Acute abdominal pain (AAP) constitutes 5–10% of all emergency department (ED) visits, with appendicitis being a prevalent AAP etiology often necessitating surgical intervention. The variability in AAP symptoms and causes, combined with the challenge of identifying appendicitis, complicate timely intervention. To estimate the risk of appendicitis, scoring systems such as the Alvarado score have been developed. However, diagnostic errors and delays remain common. Although various machine learning (ML) models have been proposed to enhance appendicitis detection, none have been seamlessly integrated into the ED workflows for AAP or are specifically designed to diagnose appendicitis as early as possible within the clinical decision-making process. To mimic daily clinical practice, this proof-of-concept study aims to develop ML models that support decision-making using comprehensive clinical data up to key decision points in the ED workflow to detect appendicitis in patients presenting with AAP. Data from the Dutch triage system at the ED, vital signs, complete medical history and physical examination findings and routine laboratory test results were retrospectively extracted from 350 AAP patients presenting to the ED of a Dutch teaching hospital from 2016 to 2023. Two eXtreme Gradient Boosting ML models were developed to differentiate cases with appendicitis from other AAP causes: one model used all data up to and including physical examination, and the other was extended with routine laboratory test results. The performance of both models was evaluated on a validation set (n = 68) and compared to the Alvarado scoring system as well as three ED physicians in a reader study. The ML models achieved AUROCs of 0.919 without laboratory test results and 0.923 with the addition of laboratory test results. The Alvarado scoring system attained an AUROC of 0.824. ED physicians achieved AUROCs of 0.894, 0.826, and 0.791 without laboratory test results, increasing to AUROCs of 0.923, 0.892, and 0.859 with laboratory test results. Both ML models demonstrated comparable high accuracy in predicting appendicitis in patients with AAP, outperforming the Alvarado scoring system. The ML models matched or surpassed ED physician performance in detecting appendicitis, with the largest potential performance gain observed in absence of laboratory test results. Integration could assist ED physicians in early and accurate diagnosis of appendicitis. ","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International cross-sectional survey on current and updated definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. 当前和更新的腹内高血压和腹腔隔室综合征定义的国际横断面调查。
IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00564-5
Prashant Nasa, Robert D Wise, Marije Smit, Stefan Acosta, Scott D'Amours, William Beaubien-Souligny, Zsolt Bodnar, Federico Coccolini, Neha S Dangayach, Wojciech Dabrowski, Juan Duchesne, Janeth C Ejike, Goran Augustin, Bart De Keulenaer, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Ashish K Khanna, Edward Kimball, Abhilash Koratala, Rosemary K Lee, Ari Leppaniemi, Edgar V Lerma, Valerie Marmolejo, Alejando Meraz-Munoz, Sheila N Myatra, Daniel Niven, Claudia Olvera, Carlos Ordoñez, Clayton Petro, Bruno M Pereira, Claudio Ronco, Adrian Regli, Derek J Roberts, Philippe Rola, Michael Rosen, Gentle S Shrestha, Michael Sugrue, Juan Carlos Q Velez, Ron Wald, Jan De Waele, Annika Reintam Blaser, Manu L N G Malbrain

Background: The Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS) established consensus definitions and recommendations for the management of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in 2006, and they were last updated in 2013. The WSACS conducted an international survey between 2022 and 2023 to seek the agreement of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) worldwide on current and new candidate statements that may be used for future guidelines.

Methods: A self-administered, online cross-sectional survey was conducted under the auspices of the WSACS to assess the level of agreement among HCPs over current and new candidate statements. The survey, distributed electronically worldwide, collected agreement or disagreement with statements on the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), pathophysiology, definitions, and management of IAH/ACS. Statistical analysis assessed agreement levels, expressed in percentages, on statements among respondents, and comparisons between groups were performed according to the respondent's education status, base specialty, duration of work experience, role (intensivist vs non-intensivist) and involvement in previous guidelines. Agreement was considered to be reached when 80% or more of the respondents agreed with a particular statement.

Results: A total of 1042 respondents from 102 countries, predominantly physicians (73%), of whom 48% were intensivists, participated. Only 59% of HCPs were aware of the 2013 WSACS guidelines, and 41% incorporated them into practice. Despite agreement in most statements, significant variability existed. Notably, agreement was not reached on four new candidate statements: "normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is 10 mmHg in critically ill adults" (77%), "clinical assessment and estimation of IAP is inaccurate" (65.2%), "intragastric can be an alternative to the intravesical route for IAP measurement" (70.4%), and "measurement of IAP should be repeated in the resting position after measurement in a supine position" (71.9%). The survey elucidated nuances in clinical practice and highlighted areas for further education and standardization.

Conclusion: More than ten years after the last published guidelines, this worldwide cross-sectional survey collected feedback and evaluated the level of agreement with current recommendations and new candidate statements. This will inform the consensus process for future guideline development.

背景:腹腔隔室学会(WSACS)于2006年建立了关于腹腔内高血压(IAH)和腹腔隔室综合征(ACS)管理的共识定义和建议,并于2013年进行了最后一次更新。WSACS在2022年至2023年间进行了一项国际调查,以寻求全球医疗保健从业者(HCPs)对当前和新的候选声明的同意,这些声明可能用于未来的指南。方法:在WSACS的主持下进行了一项自我管理的在线横断面调查,以评估HCPs对当前和新的候选陈述的同意程度。该调查在全球范围内以电子方式分发,收集了对腹内压(IAP)测量、病理生理学、定义和IAH/ACS管理的同意或不同意的陈述。统计分析评估了受访者对陈述的同意程度(以百分比表示),并根据受访者的教育状况、基础专业、工作经验持续时间、角色(强化医师与非强化医师)和对先前指南的参与程度进行了组间比较。当80%或以上的受访者同意某一特定陈述时,就认为达成了一致。结果:来自102个国家的1042名受访者参与了调查,主要是医生(73%),其中48%是重症医师。只有59%的医护人员了解2013年WSACS指南,41%将其纳入实践。尽管大多数陈述一致,但存在显著的差异。值得注意的是,在四个新的候选陈述上没有达成一致意见:“危重成人正常腹内压(IAP)为10 mmHg”(77%),“临床评估和估计IAP是不准确的”(65.2%),“胃内可以替代膀胱内测量IAP的途径”(70.4%),以及“在仰卧位测量IAP后应在静息位重复测量”(71.9%)。该调查阐明了临床实践中的细微差别,并强调了进一步教育和标准化的领域。结论:在上一份指南发表十多年后,这项全球横断面调查收集了反馈意见,并评估了与当前建议和新的候选声明的一致程度。这将为未来指南制定的共识过程提供信息。
{"title":"International cross-sectional survey on current and updated definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.","authors":"Prashant Nasa, Robert D Wise, Marije Smit, Stefan Acosta, Scott D'Amours, William Beaubien-Souligny, Zsolt Bodnar, Federico Coccolini, Neha S Dangayach, Wojciech Dabrowski, Juan Duchesne, Janeth C Ejike, Goran Augustin, Bart De Keulenaer, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Ashish K Khanna, Edward Kimball, Abhilash Koratala, Rosemary K Lee, Ari Leppaniemi, Edgar V Lerma, Valerie Marmolejo, Alejando Meraz-Munoz, Sheila N Myatra, Daniel Niven, Claudia Olvera, Carlos Ordoñez, Clayton Petro, Bruno M Pereira, Claudio Ronco, Adrian Regli, Derek J Roberts, Philippe Rola, Michael Rosen, Gentle S Shrestha, Michael Sugrue, Juan Carlos Q Velez, Ron Wald, Jan De Waele, Annika Reintam Blaser, Manu L N G Malbrain","doi":"10.1186/s13017-024-00564-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13017-024-00564-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS) established consensus definitions and recommendations for the management of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in 2006, and they were last updated in 2013. The WSACS conducted an international survey between 2022 and 2023 to seek the agreement of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) worldwide on current and new candidate statements that may be used for future guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered, online cross-sectional survey was conducted under the auspices of the WSACS to assess the level of agreement among HCPs over current and new candidate statements. The survey, distributed electronically worldwide, collected agreement or disagreement with statements on the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), pathophysiology, definitions, and management of IAH/ACS. Statistical analysis assessed agreement levels, expressed in percentages, on statements among respondents, and comparisons between groups were performed according to the respondent's education status, base specialty, duration of work experience, role (intensivist vs non-intensivist) and involvement in previous guidelines. Agreement was considered to be reached when 80% or more of the respondents agreed with a particular statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1042 respondents from 102 countries, predominantly physicians (73%), of whom 48% were intensivists, participated. Only 59% of HCPs were aware of the 2013 WSACS guidelines, and 41% incorporated them into practice. Despite agreement in most statements, significant variability existed. Notably, agreement was not reached on four new candidate statements: \"normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is 10 mmHg in critically ill adults\" (77%), \"clinical assessment and estimation of IAP is inaccurate\" (65.2%), \"intragastric can be an alternative to the intravesical route for IAP measurement\" (70.4%), and \"measurement of IAP should be repeated in the resting position after measurement in a supine position\" (71.9%). The survey elucidated nuances in clinical practice and highlighted areas for further education and standardization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than ten years after the last published guidelines, this worldwide cross-sectional survey collected feedback and evaluated the level of agreement with current recommendations and new candidate statements. This will inform the consensus process for future guideline development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605967/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142752063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1