Pub Date : 2026-02-07DOI: 10.1186/s13017-026-00674-2
Belinda De Simone, Lucienne Kasongo, Andrew A Gumbs, Fabrizio Vecchio, Alberto De Franceschi, Nicola DèAngelis, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Juan P Wachs, Tyler J Loftus, Fikri M Abu-Zidan, Rifat Latifi, Genevieve Deeken, Elie Chouillard, Andrey Litvin, Massimo Sartelli, Desiree Pantalone, Ari Leppäniemi, Mehmet Eryilmaz, Kemal Rasa, Arda Isik, Haytham M Kaafarani, Gustavo Fraga, Raul Coimbra, Ernest E Moore, Walter L Biffl, Fausto Catena
Aim: To map and critically appraise the current literature on Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in emergency general surgery, with a focus on clinical decision-support tools for preoperative risk stratification and intraoperative assistance, and to identify ethical, structural, and regulatory barriers to implementation.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted within the ARIES project, following established methodological frameworks. Relevant studies evaluating AI-based tools in emergency surgical settings were systematically identified and analyzed.
Results: The literature describes AI applications mainly in two domains: preoperative decision support, including risk prediction and diagnostic or triage models for acute abdominal and traumatic conditions, and intraoperative assistance, largely focused on computer vision-based systems for anatomical recognition, safety guidance, and navigation in minimally invasive emergency procedures. Additional contributions address training and telementoring platforms, as well as cross-cutting ethical, legal, and regulatory considerations relevant to AI adoption in emergency surgical care.
Conclusions: AI has the potential to complement emergency surgeons' clinical judgment, but its routine adoption in emergency surgical practice remains limited. Addressing methodological, ethical, and regulatory challenges, together with the development of robust data infrastructures and targeted training pathways, is essential to support safe, effective, and equitable implementation in acute care settings. In addition, the lack of dedicated investment and sustainable funding models for large-scale clinical implementation and prospective evaluation represents a critical barrier to the translation of AI from research into routine emergency surgical practice.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in emergency surgery: a scoping review within the artificial intelligence in emergency and trauma surgery (ARIES) project.","authors":"Belinda De Simone, Lucienne Kasongo, Andrew A Gumbs, Fabrizio Vecchio, Alberto De Franceschi, Nicola DèAngelis, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Juan P Wachs, Tyler J Loftus, Fikri M Abu-Zidan, Rifat Latifi, Genevieve Deeken, Elie Chouillard, Andrey Litvin, Massimo Sartelli, Desiree Pantalone, Ari Leppäniemi, Mehmet Eryilmaz, Kemal Rasa, Arda Isik, Haytham M Kaafarani, Gustavo Fraga, Raul Coimbra, Ernest E Moore, Walter L Biffl, Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-026-00674-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-026-00674-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To map and critically appraise the current literature on Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in emergency general surgery, with a focus on clinical decision-support tools for preoperative risk stratification and intraoperative assistance, and to identify ethical, structural, and regulatory barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted within the ARIES project, following established methodological frameworks. Relevant studies evaluating AI-based tools in emergency surgical settings were systematically identified and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature describes AI applications mainly in two domains: preoperative decision support, including risk prediction and diagnostic or triage models for acute abdominal and traumatic conditions, and intraoperative assistance, largely focused on computer vision-based systems for anatomical recognition, safety guidance, and navigation in minimally invasive emergency procedures. Additional contributions address training and telementoring platforms, as well as cross-cutting ethical, legal, and regulatory considerations relevant to AI adoption in emergency surgical care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI has the potential to complement emergency surgeons' clinical judgment, but its routine adoption in emergency surgical practice remains limited. Addressing methodological, ethical, and regulatory challenges, together with the development of robust data infrastructures and targeted training pathways, is essential to support safe, effective, and equitable implementation in acute care settings. In addition, the lack of dedicated investment and sustainable funding models for large-scale clinical implementation and prospective evaluation represents a critical barrier to the translation of AI from research into routine emergency surgical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146138052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1186/s13017-026-00673-3
Emad Masuadi, Yasir Ahmed Mohammed Elhadi, Osman S Abdelhamed, Zainab M Alkharas, Linda Östlundh, Gamila Ahmed, Ashraf F Hefny
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Free intraperitoneal air (FIA) after blunt trauma is traditionally considered a radiological marker of hollow viscus perforation requiring urgent laparotomy. However, emerging reports have described pneumoperitoneum without surgically meaningful bowel injury, raising concerns about unnecessary operations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the proportion of patients with blunt trauma with computed tomography (CT)-detected FIA who had no significant bowel perforation, defined as either (1) non-therapeutic laparotomy with no identified macroscopic perforation or (2) successful nonoperative management without subsequent clinical deterioration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020202174). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through November 13, 2025, for observational studies reporting the outcomes of patients with blunt trauma with CT-detected FIA. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled proportion of FIA cases without significant perforation. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared statistic (measure of heterogeneity) and τ<sup>2</sup>; small-study effects were examined using contour-enhanced funnel plots and Egger's regression. Case reports meeting eligibility criteria were narratively summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies comprising 8,972 patients with blunt trauma were included. Among them, 239 (2.7%) had CT-detected FIA. In the FIA subgroup, 117 patients (49.0%) had surgically confirmed bowel perforation, whereas 122 (51.0%) had no significant perforation, defined as a non-therapeutic laparotomy or a stable nonoperative clinical course. Among patients without FIA on CT, 56 of 8,733 (0.6%) had bowel perforation identified during surgery. The pooled analysis showed that 34% (95% CI 14-63%) of patients with FIA had no significant perforation. Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I-squared statistic = 80.3%, τ<sup>2</sup> = 3.26, p < 0.001), reflecting variations in CT acquisition, diagnostic criteria, and operative thresholds. Funnel plot asymmetry suggested potential small-study effects. Additionally, 19 case reports (20 patients) published between 1999 and 2025 illustrated that benign pneumoperitoneum most often occurred in young men following high-energy trauma, commonly associated with pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum; most underwent nontherapeutic laparotomy, whereas several were successfully managed nonoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A noteworthy subgroup of patients with blunt trauma with CT-detected FIA did not exhibit clinically significant bowel perforation
背景:钝性创伤后的游离腹腔空气(FIA)传统上被认为是需要紧急剖腹手术的空心内脏穿孔的放射学标志。然而,新出现的报告描述气腹没有手术意义上的肠损伤,引起了对不必要手术的关注。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在量化有计算机断层扫描(CT)检测到FIA的钝性创伤患者中没有明显肠穿孔的比例,定义为:(1)非治疗性剖腹手术,没有发现宏观穿孔;(2)成功的非手术治疗,没有随后的临床恶化。方法:本综述遵循2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目指南,并在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(CRD42020202174)中前瞻性注册。PubMed, Embase, Scopus和Web of Science检索到2025年11月13日,以报告钝性创伤患者ct检测FIA的结果的观察性研究。两位审稿人使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表独立进行研究选择、数据提取和质量评估。进行随机效应荟萃分析以估计无明显穿孔的FIA病例的合并比例。异质性评价采用i平方统计量(异质性度量)和τ2;采用等高线增强漏斗图和Egger回归检验小研究效应。对符合资格标准的病例报告进行叙述总结。结果:14项研究包括8,972例钝性创伤患者。其中ct检出FIA 239例(2.7%)。在FIA亚组中,117例(49.0%)患者手术证实肠穿孔,而122例(51.0%)患者无明显穿孔,定义为非治疗性剖腹手术或稳定的非手术临床过程。在CT未显示FIA的患者中,8,733例患者中有56例(0.6%)在手术中发现肠穿孔。合并分析显示,34% (95% CI 14-63%)的FIA患者无明显穿孔。结论:有一个值得注意的亚组,钝性创伤伴ct检测FIA的患者没有表现出明显的临床肠穿孔。虽然FIA仍然是一个重要的放射警告信号,但它并不是严重空心内脏损伤的独立诊断指标。临床决策应结合临床评估和辅助CT表现,而不是仅仅依靠FIA。由于FIA罕见且样本量有限,需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来完善FIA的诊断性能并优化选择性非手术治疗策略。
{"title":"Pneumoperitoneum without significant bowel perforation in patients with blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Emad Masuadi, Yasir Ahmed Mohammed Elhadi, Osman S Abdelhamed, Zainab M Alkharas, Linda Östlundh, Gamila Ahmed, Ashraf F Hefny","doi":"10.1186/s13017-026-00673-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-026-00673-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Free intraperitoneal air (FIA) after blunt trauma is traditionally considered a radiological marker of hollow viscus perforation requiring urgent laparotomy. However, emerging reports have described pneumoperitoneum without surgically meaningful bowel injury, raising concerns about unnecessary operations. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the proportion of patients with blunt trauma with computed tomography (CT)-detected FIA who had no significant bowel perforation, defined as either (1) non-therapeutic laparotomy with no identified macroscopic perforation or (2) successful nonoperative management without subsequent clinical deterioration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020202174). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through November 13, 2025, for observational studies reporting the outcomes of patients with blunt trauma with CT-detected FIA. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled proportion of FIA cases without significant perforation. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared statistic (measure of heterogeneity) and τ<sup>2</sup>; small-study effects were examined using contour-enhanced funnel plots and Egger's regression. Case reports meeting eligibility criteria were narratively summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies comprising 8,972 patients with blunt trauma were included. Among them, 239 (2.7%) had CT-detected FIA. In the FIA subgroup, 117 patients (49.0%) had surgically confirmed bowel perforation, whereas 122 (51.0%) had no significant perforation, defined as a non-therapeutic laparotomy or a stable nonoperative clinical course. Among patients without FIA on CT, 56 of 8,733 (0.6%) had bowel perforation identified during surgery. The pooled analysis showed that 34% (95% CI 14-63%) of patients with FIA had no significant perforation. Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I-squared statistic = 80.3%, τ<sup>2</sup> = 3.26, p < 0.001), reflecting variations in CT acquisition, diagnostic criteria, and operative thresholds. Funnel plot asymmetry suggested potential small-study effects. Additionally, 19 case reports (20 patients) published between 1999 and 2025 illustrated that benign pneumoperitoneum most often occurred in young men following high-energy trauma, commonly associated with pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum; most underwent nontherapeutic laparotomy, whereas several were successfully managed nonoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A noteworthy subgroup of patients with blunt trauma with CT-detected FIA did not exhibit clinically significant bowel perforation","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BACKGROUNDCardiac troponin serves as a biomarker for diagnosing myocardial contusion following blunt chest trauma and for differentiating between types of myocardial infarction. However, its interpretation in polytrauma remains challenging due to overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms. This study aims to improve troponin-based cardiac risk stratification to more accurately identify high-risk patients and enhance prognostic assessment.METHODSThis prospectively performed study included polytraumatized patients (ISS ≥ 16) admitted to a German Level 1 trauma center between January 2024 and July 2025. For each patient, six blood samples collected over ten days were analyzed for Troponin T (TnT) and NT-proBNP; and two transthoracic echocardiograms (24 h and 48 h) and ECGs were evaluated by a cardiologist. Data were correlated with clinical records, trauma-dependent and -independent cardiac risk factors, including the cardiovascular risk score (SCORE2).RESULTSSeventy-seven patients were included (mean age 52 years; 73% male; mean ISS 29). TnT was elevated in 44% at admission and in 73% after 24 h. 13% of the patients were diagnosed with a cardiac contusion. TnT elevation was associated with age ≥ 40 years, higher SCORE2, thoracic injuries, ISS ≥ 25, preclinical arrhythmias, catecholamine therapy, and surgery at admission. Two distinct TnT patterns were found: Group 1 (44%)-elevation already at admission, mirrored the overall risk profile but showed more persistent elevation in patients ≥ 60 years, with very high SCORE2 or catecholamine therapy and was especially linked to sternal fractures. Group 2 (26%)-delayed TnT rise after 24 h, associated with thoracic trauma, ISS ≥ 25, surgery and catecholamine therapy. Complications, including new-onset arrhythmias and higher mortality, occurred in both groups.CONCLUSIONCardiac involvement in polytrauma is multifactorial and often underrecognized. TnT elevation was associated with higher age, high SCORE2, severe injury, thoracic trauma, arrhythmias, and resuscitation, with a distinct subgroup showing delayed elevation after 24 h. This delayed phenotype is clinically relevant, as most of these patients had thoracic trauma and underwent early surgery, aligning with recommendations for perioperative screening for myocardial infarction. Our findings emphasize routine peri-traumatic and peri-operative troponin measurement and highlight the value of TTE and continuous ECG for detecting evolving cardiac dysfunction. Systematic follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcomes and refine cardiac risk stratification in this vulnerable population.
{"title":"Beyond the initial impact: troponin patterns frequently reveal delayed cardiac injury in polytrauma patients.","authors":"Larissa Sztulman,Victoria Pfeiffer,Miriam Saenger,Ruth Brenner,Lea Usov,Ingo Marzi,Birte Weber","doi":"10.1186/s13017-026-00672-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-026-00672-4","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDCardiac troponin serves as a biomarker for diagnosing myocardial contusion following blunt chest trauma and for differentiating between types of myocardial infarction. However, its interpretation in polytrauma remains challenging due to overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms. This study aims to improve troponin-based cardiac risk stratification to more accurately identify high-risk patients and enhance prognostic assessment.METHODSThis prospectively performed study included polytraumatized patients (ISS ≥ 16) admitted to a German Level 1 trauma center between January 2024 and July 2025. For each patient, six blood samples collected over ten days were analyzed for Troponin T (TnT) and NT-proBNP; and two transthoracic echocardiograms (24 h and 48 h) and ECGs were evaluated by a cardiologist. Data were correlated with clinical records, trauma-dependent and -independent cardiac risk factors, including the cardiovascular risk score (SCORE2).RESULTSSeventy-seven patients were included (mean age 52 years; 73% male; mean ISS 29). TnT was elevated in 44% at admission and in 73% after 24 h. 13% of the patients were diagnosed with a cardiac contusion. TnT elevation was associated with age ≥ 40 years, higher SCORE2, thoracic injuries, ISS ≥ 25, preclinical arrhythmias, catecholamine therapy, and surgery at admission. Two distinct TnT patterns were found: Group 1 (44%)-elevation already at admission, mirrored the overall risk profile but showed more persistent elevation in patients ≥ 60 years, with very high SCORE2 or catecholamine therapy and was especially linked to sternal fractures. Group 2 (26%)-delayed TnT rise after 24 h, associated with thoracic trauma, ISS ≥ 25, surgery and catecholamine therapy. Complications, including new-onset arrhythmias and higher mortality, occurred in both groups.CONCLUSIONCardiac involvement in polytrauma is multifactorial and often underrecognized. TnT elevation was associated with higher age, high SCORE2, severe injury, thoracic trauma, arrhythmias, and resuscitation, with a distinct subgroup showing delayed elevation after 24 h. This delayed phenotype is clinically relevant, as most of these patients had thoracic trauma and underwent early surgery, aligning with recommendations for perioperative screening for myocardial infarction. Our findings emphasize routine peri-traumatic and peri-operative troponin measurement and highlight the value of TTE and continuous ECG for detecting evolving cardiac dysfunction. Systematic follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcomes and refine cardiac risk stratification in this vulnerable population.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146089065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-17DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00654-y
Laura Benuzzi,Stefano P B Cioffi,Stefano Granieri,Giada Panagini,Michele Altomare,Andrea Spota,Francesco Virdis,Roberto Bini,Andrea Mingoli,Osvaldo Chiara,Stefania Cimbanassi
BACKGROUNDBlunt adrenal gland injuries (BAGI) are rare and typically reflect high-energy trauma. Despite suggestions that BAGI may be a marker of increased injury severity and mortality, evidence remains conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of BAGI on trauma severity, in-hospital mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS).METHODSA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was performed up to August 31, 2024. Studies comparing adult blunt trauma patients with and without BAGI were included. Data on Injury Severity Score (ISS), in-hospital mortality, and LOS were extracted. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E; certainty of evidence was evaluated via GRADE. Random and fixed effects models were applied based on heterogeneity levels.RESULTSEight retrospective studies involving 379,070 patients, including 15,990 with BAGI, met inclusion criteria. BAGI patients had significantly higher ISS (mean difference [MD]: 7.18; 95 % CI 2.59-11.76; p = 0.012). In-hospital mortality was not initially different (OR 1.10; 95 % CI 0.69-1.73), but sensitivity analysis excluding heterogeneity-influencing studies showed increased mortality in BAGI patients (OR 1.51; 95 % CI 1.2-1.91; p = 0.007). No significant difference in LOS was observed (MD: 3.26 days; 95 % CI - 1.56-8.10; p = 0.13). Evidence certainty was moderate for ISS and mortality, and low for LOS.CONCLUSIONSBAGI is associated with higher trauma severity and, potentially, increased mortality. While not independently predictive, its presence should prompt awareness of severe polytrauma. Standardized injury grading and prospective data are needed to clarify BAGI's prognostic role.
钝性肾上腺损伤(BAGI)是一种罕见的高能量创伤。尽管有人认为BAGI可能是损伤严重程度和死亡率增加的标志,但证据仍然相互矛盾。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估BAGI对创伤严重程度、住院死亡率和住院时间(LOS)的影响。方法系统检索截至2024年8月31日的PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库。比较有和没有BAGI的成人钝性创伤患者的研究被纳入。提取损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、住院死亡率和LOS的数据。使用ROBINS-E评估偏倚风险;通过GRADE评估证据的确定性。基于异质性水平采用随机效应和固定效应模型。结果8项回顾性研究纳入379070例患者,其中15990例为BAGI,符合纳入标准。BAGI患者的ISS明显较高(平均差异[MD]: 7.18; 95% CI 2.59-11.76; p = 0.012)。住院死亡率最初没有差异(OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.69-1.73),但排除异质性影响研究的敏感性分析显示BAGI患者死亡率增加(OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.2-1.91; p = 0.007)。观察到LOS无显著差异(MD: 3.26天;95% CI - 1.56-8.10; p = 0.13)。ISS和死亡率的证据确定性中等,LOS的证据确定性较低。结论:sbagi与较高的创伤严重程度和潜在的死亡率增加有关。虽然不能独立预测,但它的存在应该促使人们意识到严重的多发创伤。需要标准化的损伤分级和前瞻性数据来阐明BAGI的预后作用。
{"title":"Impact of blunt adrenal gland injury (BAGI) in major trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Laura Benuzzi,Stefano P B Cioffi,Stefano Granieri,Giada Panagini,Michele Altomare,Andrea Spota,Francesco Virdis,Roberto Bini,Andrea Mingoli,Osvaldo Chiara,Stefania Cimbanassi","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00654-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00654-y","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDBlunt adrenal gland injuries (BAGI) are rare and typically reflect high-energy trauma. Despite suggestions that BAGI may be a marker of increased injury severity and mortality, evidence remains conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of BAGI on trauma severity, in-hospital mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS).METHODSA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was performed up to August 31, 2024. Studies comparing adult blunt trauma patients with and without BAGI were included. Data on Injury Severity Score (ISS), in-hospital mortality, and LOS were extracted. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E; certainty of evidence was evaluated via GRADE. Random and fixed effects models were applied based on heterogeneity levels.RESULTSEight retrospective studies involving 379,070 patients, including 15,990 with BAGI, met inclusion criteria. BAGI patients had significantly higher ISS (mean difference [MD]: 7.18; 95 % CI 2.59-11.76; p = 0.012). In-hospital mortality was not initially different (OR 1.10; 95 % CI 0.69-1.73), but sensitivity analysis excluding heterogeneity-influencing studies showed increased mortality in BAGI patients (OR 1.51; 95 % CI 1.2-1.91; p = 0.007). No significant difference in LOS was observed (MD: 3.26 days; 95 % CI - 1.56-8.10; p = 0.13). Evidence certainty was moderate for ISS and mortality, and low for LOS.CONCLUSIONSBAGI is associated with higher trauma severity and, potentially, increased mortality. While not independently predictive, its presence should prompt awareness of severe polytrauma. Standardized injury grading and prospective data are needed to clarify BAGI's prognostic role.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145993041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00670-y
Gary A Bass,Christopher J McLaughlin,Lewis J Kaplan,Matt J Lee
BACKGROUNDMechanical small-bowel obstruction (SBO) has been recognized since antiquity. We systematically review the evolution of its diagnosis and treatment, with emphasis on surgical milestones, influential surgeons, and procedural advances alongside the development of imaging and non-operative therapy.METHODSWe searched primary historical texts, monographs, and PubMed-indexed articles (inception to July 2025) for descriptions of mechanical SBO management. Data on key innovations, figures, outcomes, and global knowledge sharing were extracted and chronologically synthesized. Narrative synthesis followed SANRA criteria for scholarly reviews with emphasis on clarity of scope, critical interpretation, and structured presentation of key developments.RESULTSEarly sources solely describe non-surgical measures. In one of the first invasive interventions, Praxagoras of Cos (circa 350 BCE) reportedly advocated for surgical intervention in cases of intestinal obstruction, describing a decompressive enterocutaneous fistula as a therapeutic measure when purgation failed. Operative release of strangulated hernia was re-introduced by Ambroise Paré in the sixteenth century. Ether anesthesia (1846) and antisepsis (1867) enabled safe laparotomy; shortly thereafter, Sir Frederick Treves formalized the core operative principles in 1884. Plain abdominal radiography (1900s) improved diagnosis while Owen Wangensteen's nasogastric suction (1931) reduced mortality from > 60% to ~ 5%. Antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and stapled anastomoses further enhanced outcomes. Computed tomography (1980s) became the diagnostic gold standard, guiding selective non-operative management with enteral decompression and hyperosmolar contrast administration. Minimally invasive adhesiolysis, first embarked upon in the 1990s, now benefits carefully selected patients.CONCLUSIONSMechanical SBO care has evolved from basic supportive measures to structured, evidence-based therapy. Each advance addressed a specific clinical barrier: anesthesia enabled laparotomy, radiography enabled diagnosis, and decompression enabled non-operative management. As a result, SBO now exemplifies how iterative innovation can transform a once highly morbid emergency into a condition amenable to algorithmic, protocol-driven care. This historical arc offers instructive parallels for current surgical challenges.
{"title":"Dogma, data, and decision-making: a history of treatment for small-bowel obstruction.","authors":"Gary A Bass,Christopher J McLaughlin,Lewis J Kaplan,Matt J Lee","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00670-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00670-y","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDMechanical small-bowel obstruction (SBO) has been recognized since antiquity. We systematically review the evolution of its diagnosis and treatment, with emphasis on surgical milestones, influential surgeons, and procedural advances alongside the development of imaging and non-operative therapy.METHODSWe searched primary historical texts, monographs, and PubMed-indexed articles (inception to July 2025) for descriptions of mechanical SBO management. Data on key innovations, figures, outcomes, and global knowledge sharing were extracted and chronologically synthesized. Narrative synthesis followed SANRA criteria for scholarly reviews with emphasis on clarity of scope, critical interpretation, and structured presentation of key developments.RESULTSEarly sources solely describe non-surgical measures. In one of the first invasive interventions, Praxagoras of Cos (circa 350 BCE) reportedly advocated for surgical intervention in cases of intestinal obstruction, describing a decompressive enterocutaneous fistula as a therapeutic measure when purgation failed. Operative release of strangulated hernia was re-introduced by Ambroise Paré in the sixteenth century. Ether anesthesia (1846) and antisepsis (1867) enabled safe laparotomy; shortly thereafter, Sir Frederick Treves formalized the core operative principles in 1884. Plain abdominal radiography (1900s) improved diagnosis while Owen Wangensteen's nasogastric suction (1931) reduced mortality from > 60% to ~ 5%. Antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and stapled anastomoses further enhanced outcomes. Computed tomography (1980s) became the diagnostic gold standard, guiding selective non-operative management with enteral decompression and hyperosmolar contrast administration. Minimally invasive adhesiolysis, first embarked upon in the 1990s, now benefits carefully selected patients.CONCLUSIONSMechanical SBO care has evolved from basic supportive measures to structured, evidence-based therapy. Each advance addressed a specific clinical barrier: anesthesia enabled laparotomy, radiography enabled diagnosis, and decompression enabled non-operative management. As a result, SBO now exemplifies how iterative innovation can transform a once highly morbid emergency into a condition amenable to algorithmic, protocol-driven care. This historical arc offers instructive parallels for current surgical challenges.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145961232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00669-5
Sithdharthan Ravikumar
Background: Granieri and colleagues compared small-caliber chest drains (14 Ch or smaller) with large-bore chest tubes (28 Ch or larger) for traumatic hemothorax, hemopneumothorax, and pneumothorax and combined conventional meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Main points: While the pooled effect estimate suggested no clear difference in treatment failure, clinical translation requires caution. First, the randomized trials largely represent selected, stable thoracic trauma rather than high-risk phenotypes (for example, massive hemothorax, ventilated patients, or severe polytrauma). Second, the primary endpoint ("failure") groups reinterventions that vary in clinical impact and are sensitive to local imaging and escalation thresholds (for example, second drain versus video-assisted surgery). Third, trial sequential analysis conclusions depend strongly on prespecified assumptions (baseline event rate and the smallest clinically important effect), which should be explicitly justified and, where possible, explored in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion: These clarifications may reduce overgeneralization, better align conclusions with the included trial populations, and inform pragmatic multicenter trial design with standardized protocols and patient-centered outcomes.
{"title":"Re: Small versus large bore chest tube in traumatic hemothorax, hemopneumothorax, and pneumothorax-external validity, endpoint heterogeneity, and trial sequential analysis assumptions : Author.","authors":"Sithdharthan Ravikumar","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00669-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13017-025-00669-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Granieri and colleagues compared small-caliber chest drains (14 Ch or smaller) with large-bore chest tubes (28 Ch or larger) for traumatic hemothorax, hemopneumothorax, and pneumothorax and combined conventional meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.</p><p><strong>Main points: </strong>While the pooled effect estimate suggested no clear difference in treatment failure, clinical translation requires caution. First, the randomized trials largely represent selected, stable thoracic trauma rather than high-risk phenotypes (for example, massive hemothorax, ventilated patients, or severe polytrauma). Second, the primary endpoint (\"failure\") groups reinterventions that vary in clinical impact and are sensitive to local imaging and escalation thresholds (for example, second drain versus video-assisted surgery). Third, trial sequential analysis conclusions depend strongly on prespecified assumptions (baseline event rate and the smallest clinically important effect), which should be explicitly justified and, where possible, explored in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These clarifications may reduce overgeneralization, better align conclusions with the included trial populations, and inform pragmatic multicenter trial design with standardized protocols and patient-centered outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"21 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12781418/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00662-y
Adriana Toro,Martina Rapisarda,Davide Maugeri,Alessandro Terrasi,Luisa Gallo,Luca Ansaloni,Fausto Catena,Isidoro Di Carlo
This manuscript responds to a commentary published in the World Journal of Emergency Surgery in 2025;20:9 in which the authors criticized a new technique for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Therefore, the authors of the manuscript published in the World Journal of Emergency Surgery in 2024;19:6, titled "Acute Cholecystitis: How to Avoid Subtotal Cholecystectomy-Preliminary Results," provide a critical point-by-point response and explain why this technique represents a new addition to the surgeon's armamentarium for very severe cholecystitis.
{"title":"Acute cholecystitis: a new technique to use carefully.","authors":"Adriana Toro,Martina Rapisarda,Davide Maugeri,Alessandro Terrasi,Luisa Gallo,Luca Ansaloni,Fausto Catena,Isidoro Di Carlo","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00662-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00662-y","url":null,"abstract":"This manuscript responds to a commentary published in the World Journal of Emergency Surgery in 2025;20:9 in which the authors criticized a new technique for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Therefore, the authors of the manuscript published in the World Journal of Emergency Surgery in 2024;19:6, titled \"Acute Cholecystitis: How to Avoid Subtotal Cholecystectomy-Preliminary Results,\" provide a critical point-by-point response and explain why this technique represents a new addition to the surgeon's armamentarium for very severe cholecystitis.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"2 1","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145765492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BACKGROUNDRib fractures, particularly multiple fractures, are common in patients with chest trauma and can lead to complications and an increased risk of mortality. Surgical treatment can improve patient prognosis, but fixation of nondisplaced fractures is often overlooked, and nonfixed nondisplaced fractures may undergo delayed displacement postsurgery. This study explored the risk of delayed displacement of nonfixed fractures during surgical treatment and its biomechanical mechanisms.METHODSA total of 105 patients with multiple rib fractures were included. CT scans were used to assess fracture displacement, and finite element analysis was applied to simulate the effect of thoracic movement on displacement.RESULTSPostoperatively, 56.1% of patients experienced delayed displacement, with posterior rib fractures being the most prone to displacement. Finite element analysis revealed that the posterior ribs exhibited the most significant displacement at the end of inspiration. Statistical analysis indicated that posterior rib fractures were associated with delayed displacement (OR = 0.225, p = 0.025).CONCLUSIONNonfixed, nondisplaced rib fractures are at high risk of delayed displacement postsurgery, particularly in the posterior rib region. Attention should be focused on posterior rib fractures to reduce delayed displacement and improve patient prognosis.
背景:肋骨骨折,尤其是多发骨折,在胸部外伤患者中很常见,可导致并发症和死亡风险增加。手术治疗可改善患者预后,但非移位骨折的固定常被忽视,非固定非移位骨折术后可能发生延迟移位。本研究探讨手术治疗中非固定骨折延迟移位的风险及其生物力学机制。方法分析105例多发性肋骨骨折患者的临床资料。CT扫描评估骨折位移,并应用有限元分析模拟胸部运动对位移的影响。结果56.1%的患者术后发生迟发性移位,其中后肋骨折最容易发生移位。有限元分析显示,吸气结束时后肋移位最明显。统计学分析显示后肋骨骨折与迟发性移位相关(OR = 0.225, p = 0.025)。结论非固定、非移位肋骨骨折术后迟发性移位的风险较高,尤其是后肋区。应重视后肋骨折,以减少迟发性移位,改善患者预后。
{"title":"Risk of delayed displacement and biomechanical analysis of unstable rib fractures postsurgical.","authors":"Guangqi Dong,Pengzhi Zhu,Zhiyong Su,Zhongyi Sun,Yongmin Zhang,Haiquan Zhang,Hao Gong,Jihui Zhang,Tianshuo Jiang,Dongbin Wang,Honggang Xia","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00666-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00666-8","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDRib fractures, particularly multiple fractures, are common in patients with chest trauma and can lead to complications and an increased risk of mortality. Surgical treatment can improve patient prognosis, but fixation of nondisplaced fractures is often overlooked, and nonfixed nondisplaced fractures may undergo delayed displacement postsurgery. This study explored the risk of delayed displacement of nonfixed fractures during surgical treatment and its biomechanical mechanisms.METHODSA total of 105 patients with multiple rib fractures were included. CT scans were used to assess fracture displacement, and finite element analysis was applied to simulate the effect of thoracic movement on displacement.RESULTSPostoperatively, 56.1% of patients experienced delayed displacement, with posterior rib fractures being the most prone to displacement. Finite element analysis revealed that the posterior ribs exhibited the most significant displacement at the end of inspiration. Statistical analysis indicated that posterior rib fractures were associated with delayed displacement (OR = 0.225, p = 0.025).CONCLUSIONNonfixed, nondisplaced rib fractures are at high risk of delayed displacement postsurgery, particularly in the posterior rib region. Attention should be focused on posterior rib fractures to reduce delayed displacement and improve patient prognosis.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
INTRODUCTIONMultiple rib fractures are common injuries resulting from blunt chest trauma. However, the effect of rib fracture displacement on pulmonary ventilation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of severely displaced ribs on pulmonary ventilation function (PVF) 3 months post-trauma.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis retrospective case-control study was conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Patients with multiple rib fractures (≥ 3) who underwent chest computed tomography (CT) from January 2019 to September 2023 were included. Patient demographics, injury severity, and rib fracture morphology were assessed. Displaced rib fractures were defined as bicortical displacements observed on CT. PVF was measured using forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Univariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to determine whether displaced rib fractures significantly affected PVF 3 months post-trauma.RESULTSOverall, 111 patients with multiple rib fractures were included. Displaced rib fractures were identified as an independent risk factor for having FVC < 80% at 3 months post-trauma, with each additional severely displaced rib increasing the odds by 31% (odds ratio: 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.57, p = 0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed that this effect was particularly significant in patients with non-flail chests. The receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index identified that the optimal cutoff value for significantly displaced rib fractures affecting PVF was three or more fractures.CONCLUSIONSeverely displaced rib fractures significantly impact PVF 3 months post-trauma.
多处肋骨骨折是钝性胸部外伤引起的常见损伤。然而,肋骨骨折移位对肺通气的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨严重移位肋骨对创伤后3个月肺通气功能(PVF)的影响。材料与方法本回顾性病例对照研究在长庚纪念医院进行。纳入2019年1月至2023年9月接受胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)的多发肋骨骨折(≥3)患者。评估患者人口统计学、损伤严重程度和肋骨骨折形态。移位性肋骨骨折定义为CT上观察到的双皮质移位。采用用力肺活量(FVC)和用力呼气量(1s)测定PVF。进行单因素和多因素logistic和线性回归分析,以确定移位的肋骨骨折是否在创伤后3个月显著影响PVF。结果共纳入111例多发肋骨骨折患者。移位的肋骨骨折被认为是创伤后3个月FVC < 80%的独立危险因素,每增加一根严重移位的肋骨,发生率增加31%(优势比:1.31,95% CI 1.09-1.57, p = 0.004)。亚组分析显示,这种效果在非连枷胸患者中尤为显著。患者工作特征曲线和约登指数表明,影响PVF的显著移位肋骨骨折的最佳临界值为三处或更多处骨折。结论严重移位性肋骨骨折对PVF有显著影响。
{"title":"Severely displaced rib fractures are independently associated with reduced pulmonary function at 3 months.","authors":"Yu-Hao Wang,Szu-An Chen,Yu-San Tee,Ling-Wei Kuo,Chi-Tung Cheng,Sheng-Yu Chan,Shih-Ching Kang,Chi-Hsun Hsieh,Fausto Catena,Chien-An Liao","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00667-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00667-7","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONMultiple rib fractures are common injuries resulting from blunt chest trauma. However, the effect of rib fracture displacement on pulmonary ventilation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of severely displaced ribs on pulmonary ventilation function (PVF) 3 months post-trauma.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis retrospective case-control study was conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Patients with multiple rib fractures (≥ 3) who underwent chest computed tomography (CT) from January 2019 to September 2023 were included. Patient demographics, injury severity, and rib fracture morphology were assessed. Displaced rib fractures were defined as bicortical displacements observed on CT. PVF was measured using forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Univariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to determine whether displaced rib fractures significantly affected PVF 3 months post-trauma.RESULTSOverall, 111 patients with multiple rib fractures were included. Displaced rib fractures were identified as an independent risk factor for having FVC < 80% at 3 months post-trauma, with each additional severely displaced rib increasing the odds by 31% (odds ratio: 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.57, p = 0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed that this effect was particularly significant in patients with non-flail chests. The receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index identified that the optimal cutoff value for significantly displaced rib fractures affecting PVF was three or more fractures.CONCLUSIONSeverely displaced rib fractures significantly impact PVF 3 months post-trauma.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145728548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BACKGROUNDDuodenal injuries are rare, associated with a significant morbidity. Their management is challanging and remains controversial.METHODSA retrospective study of all consecutive patients with duodenal trauma managed in 21 French trauma centers from 2004 to 2023. Clinical data, trauma mechanisms, injury severity, treatment modalities and outcomes were collected. Specific attention was given to surgical techniques such as damage control laparotomy, primary repair only and duodenal diversion. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with duodenal leak, severe morbidity and mortality.RESULTSOne hundred and thirty-five patients (71.7% male, mean age 35 years) were included, 64% with blunt trauma. Duodenal AAST grades I-II occurred in 68.2% and grades III-V in 31.8%. A discrepancy between radiologic evaluation and intraoperative observations was present in 30.8% of cases, underestimating injury severity in 29.1%. Initial management was nonoperative for 12.7%. Damage control laparotomy was required in 36.6%. Operated patients underwent direct suture (69.2%), duodenal resection (24.4%), duodenal diversion (35.8%). Duodenal leaks occurred in 23.7%, significantly increased by hemodynamic instability (OR = 3.08, p = 0.015) and associated pancreatic trauma (OR = 2.44, p = 0.044). Reoperation rate was 18.5%, for missed duodenal injury (16%) and/or for duodenal leak (32%). Mean length of stay was 27 days. Major morbidity was 27.4% and 30-day mortality 10.4%. The injury severity score was the only predictive factor of major morbidity and mortality.CONCLUSIONSDuodenal trauma remains a severe condition managed mostly with primary repair, where duodenal leak-significantly associated with hemodynamic instability and pancreatic injury, is a major driver of reintervention.TRIAL REGISTRATIONThis study was registered on Clinical Trials under the registration numbe NCT06058975.
背景:十二指肠损伤很少见,但发病率很高。它们的管理具有挑战性,而且仍存在争议。方法对2004年至2023年在法国21家外伤中心连续治疗的所有十二指肠外伤患者进行回顾性研究。收集临床资料、创伤机制、损伤严重程度、治疗方式和结果。特别注意的手术技术,如损伤控制剖腹手术,初级修复和十二指肠分流。统计分析确定与十二指肠渗漏、严重发病率和死亡率相关的因素。结果共纳入135例患者,男性71.7%,平均年龄35岁,其中64%为钝性外伤。十二指肠AAST I-II级占68.2%,III-V级占31.8%。30.8%的病例放射学评估与术中观察存在差异,29.1%的病例低估了损伤的严重程度。12.7%的患者未采取手术治疗。36.6%的患者需要行损伤控制剖腹手术。术后直接缝合(69.2%)、十二指肠切除术(24.4%)、十二指肠分流(35.8%)。23.7%发生十二指肠渗漏,血流动力学不稳定(OR = 3.08, p = 0.015)和相关胰腺损伤(OR = 2.44, p = 0.044)显著增加十二指肠渗漏。再手术率为18.5%,十二指肠漏伤(16%)和/或十二指肠漏伤(32%)。平均住院时间为27天。重度发病率为27.4%,30天死亡率为10.4%。损伤严重程度评分是主要发病率和死亡率的唯一预测因素。结论十二指肠创伤仍然是一种严重的疾病,主要通过初级修复来治疗,其中十二指肠渗漏与血流动力学不稳定和胰腺损伤密切相关,是再次干预的主要驱动因素。本研究在Clinical Trials上注册,注册号为NCT06058975。
{"title":"How are duodenal trauma managed? A French nationwide study.","authors":"Sébastien Frey,Imad Bentellis,Sébastien Gaujoux,Edouard Girard,Julio Abba,Mircea Chirica,Martin Bertrand,Etienne Boutry,Diane Mège,Mathilde Aubert,Arnaud Alves,Emmanuel Hornez,Andrea Mulliri,Raffaele Brustia,Hassen Hentati,Lelde Lauka,Alexis Laurent,Daniele Sommacale,Célia Turco,Maude Dezeustre,Melinda Bajul,Antoine Castel,Olivier Facy,Robin Grellet,Laurent Sulpice,Fabrice Ménégaux,Maxime Delestre,Emilie Lermite,Tristan Monchal,Rida Amrou,Ophélie Bacoeur-Ouzillou,Denis Pezet,Jeremy Bonnet,Emmanuel Buc,Guillaume Passot,Anne-Sophie Schneck,David Jérémie Birnbaum,Pierre-Yves Blanc,Bertrand Le Roy,Olivier Monneuse,Quentin Rodriguez,Bertrand Suc,Patrick Baqué,Vincent Dubuisson,Damien Massalou","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00661-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00661-z","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDDuodenal injuries are rare, associated with a significant morbidity. Their management is challanging and remains controversial.METHODSA retrospective study of all consecutive patients with duodenal trauma managed in 21 French trauma centers from 2004 to 2023. Clinical data, trauma mechanisms, injury severity, treatment modalities and outcomes were collected. Specific attention was given to surgical techniques such as damage control laparotomy, primary repair only and duodenal diversion. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with duodenal leak, severe morbidity and mortality.RESULTSOne hundred and thirty-five patients (71.7% male, mean age 35 years) were included, 64% with blunt trauma. Duodenal AAST grades I-II occurred in 68.2% and grades III-V in 31.8%. A discrepancy between radiologic evaluation and intraoperative observations was present in 30.8% of cases, underestimating injury severity in 29.1%. Initial management was nonoperative for 12.7%. Damage control laparotomy was required in 36.6%. Operated patients underwent direct suture (69.2%), duodenal resection (24.4%), duodenal diversion (35.8%). Duodenal leaks occurred in 23.7%, significantly increased by hemodynamic instability (OR = 3.08, p = 0.015) and associated pancreatic trauma (OR = 2.44, p = 0.044). Reoperation rate was 18.5%, for missed duodenal injury (16%) and/or for duodenal leak (32%). Mean length of stay was 27 days. Major morbidity was 27.4% and 30-day mortality 10.4%. The injury severity score was the only predictive factor of major morbidity and mortality.CONCLUSIONSDuodenal trauma remains a severe condition managed mostly with primary repair, where duodenal leak-significantly associated with hemodynamic instability and pancreatic injury, is a major driver of reintervention.TRIAL REGISTRATIONThis study was registered on Clinical Trials under the registration numbe NCT06058975.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"52 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145710898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}