Letter: Hepatoprotective Effects of Medications Used in Diabetes Mellitus—Optimal Glycaemic Control Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1111/apt.18342
Osman Cagin Buldukoglu, Serkan Ocal, Ayhan Hilmi Cekin
{"title":"Letter: Hepatoprotective Effects of Medications Used in Diabetes Mellitus—Optimal Glycaemic Control Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg","authors":"Osman Cagin Buldukoglu,&nbsp;Serkan Ocal,&nbsp;Ayhan Hilmi Cekin","doi":"10.1111/apt.18342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with great interest and congratulate Mao et al. on their study entitled ‘Glycaemic control is a modifiable risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related mortality in patients with diabetes’ [<span>1</span>]. The results of this well-designed study revealed glycaemic control as an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality.</p><p>HCC is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [<span>2</span>]. Despite medical, interventional and surgical treatment options, HCC has a case-fatality rate of 85% [<span>1, 3</span>]. This unfavourable disease outcome mandates the identification of risk factors and underlying conditions related to HCC occurrence and prognosis, such as poor glycaemic control in patients with diabetes as defined by Mao and colleagues. However, we wish to emphasise the differences in medication use in two patient groups—with optimal and suboptimal glycaemic control—enrolled in the study which would be a confounding variable.</p><p>Patients enrolled in the study by Mao et al. were split into two groups in terms of glycaemic control: optimal glycaemic control group and suboptimal glycaemic control group. Rates of statin, aspirin, insulin, pioglitazone, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue (GLP-1a) and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) uses were all statistically significantly different between the two groups. Apart from their effect on glycaemic control, all the aforementioned medications affect the risk of development and/or prognosis of HCC, hence are potential factors that would alter data analysis and study results.</p><p>Use of aspirin has been shown to lower the risk of HCC in a meta-analysis including 18 studies [<span>4</span>]. Similarly, a meta-analysis involving 59,703 HCC patients has revealed the beneficial effect of statins on HCC development [<span>5</span>]. Increased insulin levels are associated with both increased risk of and poor outcome in HCC [<span>6</span>]. Pioglitazone has been associated with lower risk of HCC, and this protective effect was correlated with cumulative drug dosage and duration of use [<span>7</span>]. A study by Hsu et al. investigated the effect of DPP-4i on the risk of HCC in chronic hepatitis C patients with diabetes mellitus and found a lower risk of HCC in the study population using DPP-4i [<span>8</span>]. A recently published study by Wang and colleagues revealed that GLP-1a is associated with a lower risk of HCC incidence and hepatic decompensation [<span>9</span>]. SGLT-2i are also shown to be related to reduced risk of HCC [<span>10</span>].</p><p>In conclusion, this intriguing study highlights the importance of optimal glycaemic control in the prevention of liver-related mortality. Future studies taking into consideration both antiglycaemic and proposed hepatoprotective effects of various medications used in diabetes mellitus will shed more light on this tangled relationship between disease state, treatment modality used and liver-related morbidity and mortality.</p><p><b>Osman Cagin Buldukoglu:</b> conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, resources, data curation, supervision. <b>Serkan Ocal:</b> conceptualization, methodology, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, investigation, supervision. <b>Ayhan Hilmi Cekin:</b> conceptualization, investigation, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, supervision, methodology.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This article is linked to Mao et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18254.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"60 11-12","pages":"1666-1667"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18342","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18342","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We read with great interest and congratulate Mao et al. on their study entitled ‘Glycaemic control is a modifiable risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related mortality in patients with diabetes’ [1]. The results of this well-designed study revealed glycaemic control as an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality.

HCC is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [2]. Despite medical, interventional and surgical treatment options, HCC has a case-fatality rate of 85% [1, 3]. This unfavourable disease outcome mandates the identification of risk factors and underlying conditions related to HCC occurrence and prognosis, such as poor glycaemic control in patients with diabetes as defined by Mao and colleagues. However, we wish to emphasise the differences in medication use in two patient groups—with optimal and suboptimal glycaemic control—enrolled in the study which would be a confounding variable.

Patients enrolled in the study by Mao et al. were split into two groups in terms of glycaemic control: optimal glycaemic control group and suboptimal glycaemic control group. Rates of statin, aspirin, insulin, pioglitazone, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue (GLP-1a) and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) uses were all statistically significantly different between the two groups. Apart from their effect on glycaemic control, all the aforementioned medications affect the risk of development and/or prognosis of HCC, hence are potential factors that would alter data analysis and study results.

Use of aspirin has been shown to lower the risk of HCC in a meta-analysis including 18 studies [4]. Similarly, a meta-analysis involving 59,703 HCC patients has revealed the beneficial effect of statins on HCC development [5]. Increased insulin levels are associated with both increased risk of and poor outcome in HCC [6]. Pioglitazone has been associated with lower risk of HCC, and this protective effect was correlated with cumulative drug dosage and duration of use [7]. A study by Hsu et al. investigated the effect of DPP-4i on the risk of HCC in chronic hepatitis C patients with diabetes mellitus and found a lower risk of HCC in the study population using DPP-4i [8]. A recently published study by Wang and colleagues revealed that GLP-1a is associated with a lower risk of HCC incidence and hepatic decompensation [9]. SGLT-2i are also shown to be related to reduced risk of HCC [10].

In conclusion, this intriguing study highlights the importance of optimal glycaemic control in the prevention of liver-related mortality. Future studies taking into consideration both antiglycaemic and proposed hepatoprotective effects of various medications used in diabetes mellitus will shed more light on this tangled relationship between disease state, treatment modality used and liver-related morbidity and mortality.

Osman Cagin Buldukoglu: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, resources, data curation, supervision. Serkan Ocal: conceptualization, methodology, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, investigation, supervision. Ayhan Hilmi Cekin: conceptualization, investigation, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, supervision, methodology.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

This article is linked to Mao et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18254.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信糖尿病药物的肝脏保护作用--最佳血糖控制只是冰山一角
我们饶有兴趣地阅读并祝贺 Mao 等人题为 "血糖控制是糖尿病患者肝细胞癌和肝脏相关死亡率的可调节风险因素 "的研究[1]。这项精心设计的研究结果表明,血糖控制是肝细胞癌(HCC)和肝脏相关死亡率的独立风险因素。HCC 是全球第六大常见癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的第三大原因[2]。尽管可以选择药物、介入和手术治疗,但 HCC 的病死率高达 85% [1,3]。这种不利的疾病结局要求我们识别与 HCC 发生和预后相关的风险因素和潜在病症,例如毛泽东及其同事定义的糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳。然而,我们想强调的是,参加该研究的两组患者--血糖控制良好组和血糖控制不佳组--在药物使用方面存在差异,这将是一个混杂变量。毛等人的研究将参加研究的患者按血糖控制情况分为两组:血糖控制良好组和血糖控制不佳组。两组患者使用他汀类药物、阿司匹林、胰岛素、吡格列酮、二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP-4i)、胰高血糖素样肽-1 类似物(GLP-1a)和钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT-2i)的比例均有显著统计学差异。除了对血糖控制的影响外,上述所有药物都会影响 HCC 的发病风险和/或预后,因此是改变数据分析和研究结果的潜在因素。一项包括 18 项研究的荟萃分析表明,使用阿司匹林可降低 HCC 的发病风险[4]。同样,一项涉及 59 703 名 HCC 患者的荟萃分析表明,他汀类药物对 HCC 的发生有益[5]。胰岛素水平升高与 HCC 风险增加和不良预后有关 [6]。吡格列酮与降低 HCC 风险有关,这种保护作用与累积用药量和用药时间相关[7]。Hsu 等人的研究调查了 DPP-4i 对慢性丙型肝炎合并糖尿病患者 HCC 风险的影响,发现使用 DPP-4i 的研究人群 HCC 风险较低[8]。Wang 及其同事最近发表的一项研究显示,GLP-1a 与较低的 HCC 发病率和肝功能失代偿风险相关[9]。总之,这项引人入胜的研究强调了最佳血糖控制在预防肝脏相关死亡中的重要性。未来的研究将同时考虑糖尿病患者使用的各种药物的抗血糖作用和拟议的保肝作用,这将使人们对疾病状态、所用治疗方式与肝脏相关发病率和死亡率之间的纠结关系有更多的了解。塞尔坎-奥卡尔(Serkan Ocal):构思、方法论、写作--审阅和编辑、正式分析、调查、监督。Ayhan Hilmi Cekin:构思、调查、写作--审阅和编辑、正式分析、监督、方法学。作者声明无利益冲突。如需查看本文,请访问 https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18254。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Dysfunctional Neutrophils in Cirrhosis With Acute Decompensation-Why It Matters. Authors' Reply. Editorial: Dysfunctional Neutrophils in Cirrhosis With Acute Decompensation: Why It Matters. Editorial: Decoding Gut Failure in Cirrhosis-Villin-1 and the Emergence of a Seventh Organ Failure. Authors' Reply. Editorial: Decoding Gut Failure in Cirrhosis: Villin-1 and the Emergence of a Seventh Organ Failure. Review Article: Renal Safety Profiles of Tenofovir Alafenamide, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection-General and Special Populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1