Understanding EFL students’ academically transitioning experiences with meaning-making-based instruction: A qualitative inquiry

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Linguistics and Education Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2024.101357
{"title":"Understanding EFL students’ academically transitioning experiences with meaning-making-based instruction: A qualitative inquiry","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This qualitative study took place in a content-based English as a foreign language (EFL) reading course at a Chinese university. The students had to academically transition from their prior reading practices, which involved surface meaning and/or linguistic resources, to the deconstruction of the deep meaning of texts. Interviews with 16 EFL students, their reflections, as well as the researcher's field notes and audio recordings of classroom interactions, were qualitatively analyzed. The study reveals that the EFL student readers’ academic transition to the content-based reading course was supported by the pedagogical use of systemic functional linguistics (SFL). With SFL pedagogy, the students were exposed to meaning-making-based instruction, which focused on the close relationship between linguistic resources and meanings. This transition was especially exemplified by the students’ positive experiences with leveraging meaning-making-based knowledge when harnessing linguistic resources as gateways for gaining access to the deep meanings of texts, as expected in the transitioning context. However, during the transitioning process in relation to their meaning-making-based knowledge, students encountered constraints from their previous and ongoing experiences (e.g., their sensitivity to the linguistic resources in a text or textbook design), which were mitigated through teacher mediation. This study concludes that meaning-making-based instruction may have played a useful role in mediating and facilitating the EFL student readers’ transition to academically demanding reading, although the transitioning process was sensitive to dynamic but surmountable constraints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study took place in a content-based English as a foreign language (EFL) reading course at a Chinese university. The students had to academically transition from their prior reading practices, which involved surface meaning and/or linguistic resources, to the deconstruction of the deep meaning of texts. Interviews with 16 EFL students, their reflections, as well as the researcher's field notes and audio recordings of classroom interactions, were qualitatively analyzed. The study reveals that the EFL student readers’ academic transition to the content-based reading course was supported by the pedagogical use of systemic functional linguistics (SFL). With SFL pedagogy, the students were exposed to meaning-making-based instruction, which focused on the close relationship between linguistic resources and meanings. This transition was especially exemplified by the students’ positive experiences with leveraging meaning-making-based knowledge when harnessing linguistic resources as gateways for gaining access to the deep meanings of texts, as expected in the transitioning context. However, during the transitioning process in relation to their meaning-making-based knowledge, students encountered constraints from their previous and ongoing experiences (e.g., their sensitivity to the linguistic resources in a text or textbook design), which were mitigated through teacher mediation. This study concludes that meaning-making-based instruction may have played a useful role in mediating and facilitating the EFL student readers’ transition to academically demanding reading, although the transitioning process was sensitive to dynamic but surmountable constraints.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基于意义建构的教学,了解 EFL 学生的学业过渡体验:定性调查
这项定性研究发生在中国一所大学以内容为基础的英语作为外语(EFL)阅读课程中。学生们必须从以往涉及表层意义和/或语言资源的阅读实践过渡到解构文本深层意义的阅读实践。本研究对 16 名 EFL 学生的访谈、他们的反思以及研究者的现场笔记和课堂互动录音进行了定性分析。研究显示,系统功能语言学(SFL)教学法的使用支持了 EFL 学生读者向基于内容的阅读课程的学术过渡。通过 SFL 教学法,学生们接触到了以意义生成为基础的教学,这种教学注重语言资源与意义之间的密切关系。这种过渡尤其体现在学生在利用语言资源作为通向文本深层意义的门户时,对利用意义建构型知识的积极体验上,这也是过渡语境中所期待的。然而,在与基于意义建构的知识相关的过渡过程中,学生遇到了来自他们以往和正在进行的经验的限制(例如,他们对文本或教科书设计中的语言资源的敏感性),这些限制在教师的调解下得到了缓解。本研究的结论是,以意义建构为基础的教学可能在调解和促进英语语言学生读者过渡到学术要求较高的阅读方面发挥了有益的作用,尽管过渡过程对动态但可克服的制约因素很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
期刊最新文献
Understanding EFL students’ academically transitioning experiences with meaning-making-based instruction: A qualitative inquiry On the necessity (and insufficiency) of ethnographic perspectives: Towards an inter-scalar approach to research on “academic language” Let a hundred flowers bloom: Towards a coexistence of paradigms in language assessment literacy Pre-service teachers’ hinting practices in managing responses in a microteaching context Disciplinary content and text structures communicated in the classroom – pathways in science lessons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1