Rainfall characteristics over the Congo Air Boundary Region in southern Africa: A comparison of station and gridded rainfall products

IF 4.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Atmospheric Research Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107718
{"title":"Rainfall characteristics over the Congo Air Boundary Region in southern Africa: A comparison of station and gridded rainfall products","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strong meridional rainfall gradients exist between the tropics and subtropics in southwestern Africa, bounded to the north by the moist Congo basin and to the south by the Kalahari Desert. This domain received relatively little scientific attention compared to the rest of southern Africa. In this study, the limited available station data are assessed against six gridded rainfall products (CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR, ERA5, GPCC and CPC) for various rainfall characteristics. The nearest neighbour approach was used to match the closest rainfall dataset pixel to each station location, with the assumption that each rain gauge represents observation of various pixels of products, irrespective of product resolution. Results reveal that ERA5, CHIRPS and PERSIANN-CDR tend to represent the monthly rainfall totals and number of rainy days well for most stations although magnitudes and monthly peaks differ. CPC and GPCC tend to perform poorly for magnitudes of rainfall, rainy days and monthly cycles especially for Angolan stations. These products also fail to adequately capture spatial distributions of rainfall, with poor representation of the strong gradients found in the region.</div><div>Correlations between various gridded rainfall products mostly show good agreement in rainfall totals and rainy days. For early summer (October–November-December) moderate rainy days, ERA5 and CHIRPS products tend to have more days than the stations while CPC and GPCC products perform poorly over Angola and in the south. ERA5 generally overestimates rainfall in mountainous regions, while other products tend to underestimate it. Based on the Simple Daily Intensity Index, it was found that for most of the gridded rainfall products tend to overestimate rainfall during rainy days in the northern and wetter part of the domain. Furthermore, for heavy rainfall, CPC and GPCC tend to compare fairly well with stations in the southern and eastern parts of the domain but poorly with those in the western parts. PERSIANN-CDR tends to underestimate heavy rainy days for most stations in early and late summer (January–February-March-April). However, CHIRPS compares well at several stations, while ERA5 performs well for stations located in the south. This study helps provide useful guidance in choosing suitable rainfall gridded datasets for assessing long term rainfall cycles, daily rainfall characteristics as well as extremes over southwestern Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8600,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169809524005003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strong meridional rainfall gradients exist between the tropics and subtropics in southwestern Africa, bounded to the north by the moist Congo basin and to the south by the Kalahari Desert. This domain received relatively little scientific attention compared to the rest of southern Africa. In this study, the limited available station data are assessed against six gridded rainfall products (CHIRPS, PERSIANN-CDR, ERA5, GPCC and CPC) for various rainfall characteristics. The nearest neighbour approach was used to match the closest rainfall dataset pixel to each station location, with the assumption that each rain gauge represents observation of various pixels of products, irrespective of product resolution. Results reveal that ERA5, CHIRPS and PERSIANN-CDR tend to represent the monthly rainfall totals and number of rainy days well for most stations although magnitudes and monthly peaks differ. CPC and GPCC tend to perform poorly for magnitudes of rainfall, rainy days and monthly cycles especially for Angolan stations. These products also fail to adequately capture spatial distributions of rainfall, with poor representation of the strong gradients found in the region.
Correlations between various gridded rainfall products mostly show good agreement in rainfall totals and rainy days. For early summer (October–November-December) moderate rainy days, ERA5 and CHIRPS products tend to have more days than the stations while CPC and GPCC products perform poorly over Angola and in the south. ERA5 generally overestimates rainfall in mountainous regions, while other products tend to underestimate it. Based on the Simple Daily Intensity Index, it was found that for most of the gridded rainfall products tend to overestimate rainfall during rainy days in the northern and wetter part of the domain. Furthermore, for heavy rainfall, CPC and GPCC tend to compare fairly well with stations in the southern and eastern parts of the domain but poorly with those in the western parts. PERSIANN-CDR tends to underestimate heavy rainy days for most stations in early and late summer (January–February-March-April). However, CHIRPS compares well at several stations, while ERA5 performs well for stations located in the south. This study helps provide useful guidance in choosing suitable rainfall gridded datasets for assessing long term rainfall cycles, daily rainfall characteristics as well as extremes over southwestern Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南部非洲刚果空气边界地区的降雨特征:站点和网格降雨产品比较
非洲西南部的热带和亚热带之间存在着强烈的经向降雨梯度,北面是潮湿的刚果盆地,南面是卡拉哈里沙漠。与南部非洲其他地区相比,这一地区受到的科学关注相对较少。本研究根据六种网格降雨产品(CHIRPS、PERSIANN-CDR、ERA5、GPCC 和 CPC)的各种降雨特征,对有限的可用站点数据进行了评估。使用最近邻方法将最接近的降雨数据集像素与每个站点位置相匹配,假设每个雨量计都代表了对不同产品像素的观测,而与产品分辨率无关。结果显示,ERA5、CHIRPS 和 PERSIANN-CDR 能够很好地反映大多数站点的月降雨总量和降雨日数,尽管降雨量和月峰值有所不同。而 CPC 和 GPCC 在降雨量、降雨日数和月降雨周期方面表现不佳,尤其是安哥拉站点。这些产品也未能充分捕捉降雨的空间分布,对该地区发现的强烈梯度表现不佳。各种网格降雨产品之间的相关性大多表明,在降雨总量和降雨日数方面存在良好的一致性。对于初夏(10 月-11 月-12 月)的中雨日,ERA5 和 CHIRPS 产品的雨日往往多于观测站的雨日,而 CPC 和 GPCC 产品在安哥拉上空和南部表现不佳。ERA5通常高估了山区的降雨量,而其他产品往往低估了山区的降雨量。根据简单日强度指数发现,大多数网格降雨产品都倾向于高估北部和湿润地区雨天的降雨量。此外,就暴雨而言,CPC 和 GPCC 与区域南部和东部站点的比较结果相当好,但与西部站点的比较结果较差。在夏初和夏末(1 月-2 月-3 月-4 月),PERSIANN-CDR 往往低估了大多数站点的暴雨日数。不过,CHIRPS 在几个站点的表现不错,而 ERA5 在南部站点的表现也很好。这项研究有助于为评估非洲西南部的长期降雨周期、日降雨特征和极端天气选择合适的降雨网格数据集提供有用的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Research
Atmospheric Research 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
460
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes scientific papers (research papers, review articles, letters and notes) dealing with the part of the atmosphere where meteorological events occur. Attention is given to all processes extending from the earth surface to the tropopause, but special emphasis continues to be devoted to the physics of clouds, mesoscale meteorology and air pollution, i.e. atmospheric aerosols; microphysical processes; cloud dynamics and thermodynamics; numerical simulation, climatology, climate change and weather modification.
期刊最新文献
Liquid cloud drop effective radius over China: A 20-year MODIS-based assessment Editorial Board Legacy of aerosol radiative effect predominates daytime dust loading evolution Fractal dimension analysis of lightning discharges of various types based on a comprehensive literature review The effect of temperature and humidity of air on the concentration of particulate matter - PM2.5 and PM10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1