Game theoretic operation optimization of photovoltaic storage charging station considering uncertainty and carbon trading

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of energy storage Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.est.2024.114111
{"title":"Game theoretic operation optimization of photovoltaic storage charging station considering uncertainty and carbon trading","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2024.114111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the advancement of energy conservation and emission reduction efforts, the orderly charging of electric vehicles and the operation of photovoltaic-storage-charging stations associated with electric vehicles have become increasingly important topics. This study constructs an optimization model for the operation of stations under the synergy of electricity and carbon markets from a game theory perspective. Firstly, Latin hypercube sampling and Monte Carlo sampling are employed to handle the uncertainties in photovoltaic output and the stochastic nature of electric vehicles charging. Secondly, a ladder-type carbon trading mechanism is introduced, and a charging optimization model based on Stackelberg game theory is developed to describe the benefit interaction between charging stations and electric vehicles users. In this model, the upper level represents the charging station operator aiming to maximize joint electricity and carbon revenue while minimizing load fluctuations, whereas the lower level represents electric vehicles users aiming to maximize consumer surplus. Finally, a genetic algorithm nested with mixed-integer linear programming is used to solve the optimization model. The simulation results validate the model's effectiveness and superiority. The results indicate that, compared to centralized optimization methods, the Stackelberg game mechanism can increase consumer surplus by 119.40 %, reduce carbon emissions by 217.92 %, and achieve a win-win situation for both parties. Compared to a fixed carbon trading value, the ladder-type carbon trading mechanism can reduce carbon emissions by 23.84 % and smooth load fluctuations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X24036971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advancement of energy conservation and emission reduction efforts, the orderly charging of electric vehicles and the operation of photovoltaic-storage-charging stations associated with electric vehicles have become increasingly important topics. This study constructs an optimization model for the operation of stations under the synergy of electricity and carbon markets from a game theory perspective. Firstly, Latin hypercube sampling and Monte Carlo sampling are employed to handle the uncertainties in photovoltaic output and the stochastic nature of electric vehicles charging. Secondly, a ladder-type carbon trading mechanism is introduced, and a charging optimization model based on Stackelberg game theory is developed to describe the benefit interaction between charging stations and electric vehicles users. In this model, the upper level represents the charging station operator aiming to maximize joint electricity and carbon revenue while minimizing load fluctuations, whereas the lower level represents electric vehicles users aiming to maximize consumer surplus. Finally, a genetic algorithm nested with mixed-integer linear programming is used to solve the optimization model. The simulation results validate the model's effectiveness and superiority. The results indicate that, compared to centralized optimization methods, the Stackelberg game mechanism can increase consumer surplus by 119.40 %, reduce carbon emissions by 217.92 %, and achieve a win-win situation for both parties. Compared to a fixed carbon trading value, the ladder-type carbon trading mechanism can reduce carbon emissions by 23.84 % and smooth load fluctuations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑不确定性和碳交易的光伏储能充电站博弈论运营优化
随着节能减排工作的推进,电动汽车的有序充电以及与电动汽车相关的光伏-储能充电站的运营日益成为重要课题。本研究从博弈论角度出发,构建了电力市场和碳市场协同作用下的充电站运营优化模型。首先,采用拉丁超立方采样和蒙特卡罗采样来处理光伏输出的不确定性和电动汽车充电的随机性。其次,引入了阶梯式碳交易机制,并建立了基于斯塔克尔伯格博弈论的充电优化模型,以描述充电站与电动汽车用户之间的利益互动。在该模型中,上层代表充电站运营商,其目标是最大化电力和碳的联合收益,同时最小化负荷波动;下层代表电动汽车用户,其目标是最大化消费者剩余。最后,使用嵌套混合整数线性规划的遗传算法来求解优化模型。模拟结果验证了模型的有效性和优越性。结果表明,与集中优化方法相比,斯塔克尔伯格博弈机制可增加 119.40 % 的消费者剩余,减少 217.92 % 的碳排放,实现双方共赢。与固定碳交易值相比,阶梯式碳交易机制可减少 23.84 % 的碳排放,并能平滑负荷波动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Improvement of the thermal management of lithium-ion battery with helical tube liquid cooling and phase change material integration Efficiency improvement and pressure pulsation reduction of volute centrifugal pump through diffuser design optimization Fast kinetics for lithium storage rendered by Li3VO4 nanoparticles/porous N-doped carbon nanofibers Accelerating float current measurement with temperature ramps revealing entropy insights A highly water-soluble phenoxazine quaternary ammonium compound catholyte for pH-neutral aqueous organic redox flow batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1