Taohui Lian , Yaning Li , Xun Wang , Shuang Xiang , Yinzhan Liu , Shucun Sun
{"title":"Effect of grazing exclusion on plant communities varies over time in a Tibetan alpine meadow","authors":"Taohui Lian , Yaning Li , Xun Wang , Shuang Xiang , Yinzhan Liu , Shucun Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fencing is an important and common grassland management strategy for restoring areas degraded by grazing. However, experimental evidence regarding the differences between the effects of short-term and long-term fencing on grassland structure remains insufficient, and the mechanisms by which fencing influences plant diversity and community structure are not yet fully understood. A long-term fencing experiment was conducted in a Tibetan meadow. We investigated Hill diversity, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), plant community height, species richness, and the biomass and height of four plant functional groups (including grasses, forbs, legumes, and sedges) after 1, 2, 3, and 13 years of fencing. This allowed us to compare the differing impacts of fencing on diversity and community structure over time. Additionally, we collected data on environmental factors such as soil compaction, soil moisture, soil nutrients, and plant litter biomass to elucidate the effects of fencing on plant communities. Our results indicated that short-term fencing increased Hill diversity within plant communities. Conversely, long-term fencing significantly decreased Hill diversity in alpine meadows. Furthermore, fencing reduced aboveground net primary productivity across all four assessment periods. Plant diversity exhibited a positive correlation with soil compaction and soil moisture, but a negative correlation with community height, litter biomass, and litter height. Fencing primarily influenced the diversity of litter biomass, community height, and soil nitrate nitrogen content across all biotic and abiotic factors. Our findings demonstrate that the effects of short-term and long-term fencing on plant communities differ markedly. Long-term fencing can adversely affect plant communities through litter accumulation and alterations in soil physical properties; therefore, the duration of fencing must be considered in grassland restoration efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fencing is an important and common grassland management strategy for restoring areas degraded by grazing. However, experimental evidence regarding the differences between the effects of short-term and long-term fencing on grassland structure remains insufficient, and the mechanisms by which fencing influences plant diversity and community structure are not yet fully understood. A long-term fencing experiment was conducted in a Tibetan meadow. We investigated Hill diversity, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), plant community height, species richness, and the biomass and height of four plant functional groups (including grasses, forbs, legumes, and sedges) after 1, 2, 3, and 13 years of fencing. This allowed us to compare the differing impacts of fencing on diversity and community structure over time. Additionally, we collected data on environmental factors such as soil compaction, soil moisture, soil nutrients, and plant litter biomass to elucidate the effects of fencing on plant communities. Our results indicated that short-term fencing increased Hill diversity within plant communities. Conversely, long-term fencing significantly decreased Hill diversity in alpine meadows. Furthermore, fencing reduced aboveground net primary productivity across all four assessment periods. Plant diversity exhibited a positive correlation with soil compaction and soil moisture, but a negative correlation with community height, litter biomass, and litter height. Fencing primarily influenced the diversity of litter biomass, community height, and soil nitrate nitrogen content across all biotic and abiotic factors. Our findings demonstrate that the effects of short-term and long-term fencing on plant communities differ markedly. Long-term fencing can adversely affect plant communities through litter accumulation and alterations in soil physical properties; therefore, the duration of fencing must be considered in grassland restoration efforts.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.