Effect of grazing exclusion on plant communities varies over time in a Tibetan alpine meadow

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107420
Taohui Lian , Yaning Li , Xun Wang , Shuang Xiang , Yinzhan Liu , Shucun Sun
{"title":"Effect of grazing exclusion on plant communities varies over time in a Tibetan alpine meadow","authors":"Taohui Lian ,&nbsp;Yaning Li ,&nbsp;Xun Wang ,&nbsp;Shuang Xiang ,&nbsp;Yinzhan Liu ,&nbsp;Shucun Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fencing is an important and common grassland management strategy for restoring areas degraded by grazing. However, experimental evidence regarding the differences between the effects of short-term and long-term fencing on grassland structure remains insufficient, and the mechanisms by which fencing influences plant diversity and community structure are not yet fully understood. A long-term fencing experiment was conducted in a Tibetan meadow. We investigated Hill diversity, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), plant community height, species richness, and the biomass and height of four plant functional groups (including grasses, forbs, legumes, and sedges) after 1, 2, 3, and 13 years of fencing. This allowed us to compare the differing impacts of fencing on diversity and community structure over time. Additionally, we collected data on environmental factors such as soil compaction, soil moisture, soil nutrients, and plant litter biomass to elucidate the effects of fencing on plant communities. Our results indicated that short-term fencing increased Hill diversity within plant communities. Conversely, long-term fencing significantly decreased Hill diversity in alpine meadows. Furthermore, fencing reduced aboveground net primary productivity across all four assessment periods. Plant diversity exhibited a positive correlation with soil compaction and soil moisture, but a negative correlation with community height, litter biomass, and litter height. Fencing primarily influenced the diversity of litter biomass, community height, and soil nitrate nitrogen content across all biotic and abiotic factors. Our findings demonstrate that the effects of short-term and long-term fencing on plant communities differ markedly. Long-term fencing can adversely affect plant communities through litter accumulation and alterations in soil physical properties; therefore, the duration of fencing must be considered in grassland restoration efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fencing is an important and common grassland management strategy for restoring areas degraded by grazing. However, experimental evidence regarding the differences between the effects of short-term and long-term fencing on grassland structure remains insufficient, and the mechanisms by which fencing influences plant diversity and community structure are not yet fully understood. A long-term fencing experiment was conducted in a Tibetan meadow. We investigated Hill diversity, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), plant community height, species richness, and the biomass and height of four plant functional groups (including grasses, forbs, legumes, and sedges) after 1, 2, 3, and 13 years of fencing. This allowed us to compare the differing impacts of fencing on diversity and community structure over time. Additionally, we collected data on environmental factors such as soil compaction, soil moisture, soil nutrients, and plant litter biomass to elucidate the effects of fencing on plant communities. Our results indicated that short-term fencing increased Hill diversity within plant communities. Conversely, long-term fencing significantly decreased Hill diversity in alpine meadows. Furthermore, fencing reduced aboveground net primary productivity across all four assessment periods. Plant diversity exhibited a positive correlation with soil compaction and soil moisture, but a negative correlation with community height, litter biomass, and litter height. Fencing primarily influenced the diversity of litter biomass, community height, and soil nitrate nitrogen content across all biotic and abiotic factors. Our findings demonstrate that the effects of short-term and long-term fencing on plant communities differ markedly. Long-term fencing can adversely affect plant communities through litter accumulation and alterations in soil physical properties; therefore, the duration of fencing must be considered in grassland restoration efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在西藏高山草甸上,禁牧对植物群落的影响随时间而变化
围栏是恢复放牧退化地区的一种重要而常见的草原管理策略。然而,有关短期和长期围栏对草地结构影响差异的实验证据仍然不足,围栏影响植物多样性和群落结构的机制也尚未完全清楚。我们在西藏的一片草地上进行了长期围栏实验。我们调查了围栏1年、2年、3年和13年后的希尔多样性、地上净初级生产力(ANPP)、植物群落高度、物种丰富度以及四个植物功能群(包括禾本科、草本、豆科和莎草)的生物量和高度。这样,我们就能比较围栏随着时间的推移对多样性和群落结构产生的不同影响。此外,我们还收集了土壤压实度、土壤湿度、土壤养分和植物枯落物生物量等环境因素的数据,以阐明围栏对植物群落的影响。结果表明,短期围栏增加了植物群落内的希尔多样性。相反,长期围栏明显降低了高山草甸的希尔多样性。此外,在所有四个评估期间,围栏都降低了地上净初级生产力。植物多样性与土壤压实度和土壤湿度呈正相关,但与群落高度、枯落物生物量和枯落物高度呈负相关。在所有生物和非生物因素中,围栏主要影响枯落物生物量、群落高度和土壤硝态氮含量的多样性。我们的研究结果表明,短期和长期围栏对植物群落的影响明显不同。长期围栏会通过枯落物的积累和土壤物理特性的改变对植物群落产生不利影响;因此,在草原恢复工作中必须考虑围栏的持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Effects of restorative treatments confirmed in a restored pond Living in a material world: Support for the use of natural and alternative materials in coastal restoration and living shorelines Editorial Board Long term performance of Nature-Based Solutions as decentralized wastewater treatment: a case study of a retail store in southern Italy Are floating mangrove breakwaters effective for wave attenuation? - A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1