Mayeen Uddin Khandaker , Hiromitsu Haba , Ahmed Rufai Usman , Mustafa Mahmoud , Naohiko Otuka , Samer K.I. Ali
{"title":"Activation cross-sections of proton-induced nuclear reactions on natural zinc in the energy range of 4–30 MeV","authors":"Mayeen Uddin Khandaker , Hiromitsu Haba , Ahmed Rufai Usman , Mustafa Mahmoud , Naohiko Otuka , Samer K.I. Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the present work, the excitation functions for the proton-induced nuclear reactions on natural zinc were measured in the energy range of 4–30 MeV using the well-established stacked-foil activation procedure. The activation products were measured based on their characteristic gamma lines using HPGe γ-ray spectrometry. The radioactivities determined were used for the calculation of cross-sections of the radionuclides of interest, i.e., <sup>61</sup>Cu, <sup>62,65,69m</sup>Zn, <sup>57</sup>Co and <sup>66,67,68</sup>Ga. The cross-sections have also been compared with the available literature data and the theoretical prediction of the TALYS code via its latest TENDL-2023 library as well as the prediction of EMPIRE-3.2.2 model code. The results show a reasonable agreement when compared with the available literature data. This work, however, shows that the theoretical data extracted from the TENDL-2023 library and EMPIRE-3.2.2 default calculation significantly underestimate the experimental cross-sections of <sup>57</sup>Co nuclide while they overestimate those of <sup>69m</sup>Zn. The present result has potential applications to improve the predicting capability of the model codes as well as to serve as additional data for the nuclear reaction cross-section database.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 112272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24007643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the present work, the excitation functions for the proton-induced nuclear reactions on natural zinc were measured in the energy range of 4–30 MeV using the well-established stacked-foil activation procedure. The activation products were measured based on their characteristic gamma lines using HPGe γ-ray spectrometry. The radioactivities determined were used for the calculation of cross-sections of the radionuclides of interest, i.e., 61Cu, 62,65,69mZn, 57Co and 66,67,68Ga. The cross-sections have also been compared with the available literature data and the theoretical prediction of the TALYS code via its latest TENDL-2023 library as well as the prediction of EMPIRE-3.2.2 model code. The results show a reasonable agreement when compared with the available literature data. This work, however, shows that the theoretical data extracted from the TENDL-2023 library and EMPIRE-3.2.2 default calculation significantly underestimate the experimental cross-sections of 57Co nuclide while they overestimate those of 69mZn. The present result has potential applications to improve the predicting capability of the model codes as well as to serve as additional data for the nuclear reaction cross-section database.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.