The diverse impacts of democracy on greenhouse gas emissions

IF 6.6 2区经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108411

Yacov Tsur

{"title":"The diverse impacts of democracy on greenhouse gas emissions","authors":"Yacov Tsur","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A model to assess the relationship between attributes of democracy and greenhouse gas emissions is developed. Applying this framework to a comprehensive panel dataset covering more than 150 countries over the recent three decades, the following key findings emerge: <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> Direct Popular Voting is highly effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions across all sources. <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> Civil Society Participation also proves effective, though its impact is reduced for emissions from well-identified sources. <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> Greater emphasis on individual and political liberties reduces the effectiveness of Liberal Democracy in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions compared to the previous two indicators. <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mi>v</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> The impacts of Judicial Constraint on the Executive and Freedom of Expression, while not negligible, are weaker compared to those of the first three indicators. These findings are interpreted and explained, and their implications for the design and implementation of climate policies are examined.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 108411"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

A model to assess the relationship between attributes of democracy and greenhouse gas emissions is developed. Applying this framework to a comprehensive panel dataset covering more than 150 countries over the recent three decades, the following key findings emerge:

(i)

Direct Popular Voting is highly effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions across all sources.

(i i)

Civil Society Participation also proves effective, though its impact is reduced for emissions from well-identified sources.

(i i i)

Greater emphasis on individual and political liberties reduces the effectiveness of Liberal Democracy in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions compared to the previous two indicators.

(i v)

The impacts of Judicial Constraint on the Executive and Freedom of Expression, while not negligible, are weaker compared to those of the first three indicators. These findings are interpreted and explained, and their implications for the design and implementation of climate policies are examined.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

民主对温室气体排放的不同影响

本文建立了一个模型来评估民主属性与温室气体排放之间的关系。将这一框架应用于最近三十年来 150 多个国家的综合面板数据集，得出以下主要结论：(i) 直接民众投票在减少所有来源的温室气体排放方面非常有效。(ii) 民间社会参与也被证明是有效的，尽管其对明确来源的排放的影响有所减弱。(iii) 与前两个指标相比，更加强调个人和政治自由降低了自由民主在减少温室气体排放方面的有效性。(iv) 司法对行政的制约和言论自由的影响虽然不容忽视，但与前三个指标相比较弱。本文对这些发现进行了解释和说明，并探讨了它们对气候政策的设计和实施的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学

CiteScore

12.00

自引率

5.70%

发文量

313

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.