Determination of rates of occurrence for hydroplaning events with naturalistic driving data

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.09.018
Christina Witcher , Daniel Christ , Jeremy Sudweeks , Charles Layman , Miguel Perez
{"title":"Determination of rates of occurrence for hydroplaning events with naturalistic driving data","authors":"Christina Witcher ,&nbsp;Daniel Christ ,&nbsp;Jeremy Sudweeks ,&nbsp;Charles Layman ,&nbsp;Miguel Perez","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction:</em> The degree to which hydroplaning occurs in real-world conditions is not entirely known. Naturalistic driving data can be helpful in addressing some of the limitations of existing data sources related to the incidence of hydroplaning. <em>Method:</em> Data from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study were leveraged to estimate the incidence of hydroplaning. Two hydroplaning detection algorithms were used for candidate hydroplaning event generation. Hard braking events were also identified and analyzed as normative comparisons to the hydroplaning events. <em>Results:</em> A total of 1,141 hydroplaning events were found in the naturalistic driving data and utilized for analysis, including 650 hydroplaning events that were unnoticeable by the driver based on lack of observable reactions, 13 events that were deemed to be of “critical” severity, and only 3 events that resulted in crash events during more than 30 million miles of driving. Hard braking events occurred nearly four times more often, and at comparatively lower speeds, than hydroplaning events. Observable driver reactions also differed between event types. For example, more drivers changed their posture after a hydroplaning event than after a hard braking event and drivers maintained both hands on the wheel at higher rates after experiencing a hydroplaning event than after a hard braking event. Suspension of secondary tasks during hard braking and hydroplaning events was also observed. <em>Conclusions:</em> Overall, these findings suggest that drivers perceive hydroplaning events as more harmful than hard braking events, despite the large discrepancy and incompatibility in how often these driving situations lead to vehicular crashes. <em>Practical application:</em> The findings of this research will provide vehicle and tire designers with empirical data that quantifies the important tradeoffs they must make in balancing vehicle and tire performance in wet and dry environments, and in tradeoffs related to tire wear performance and grip.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 303-313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The degree to which hydroplaning occurs in real-world conditions is not entirely known. Naturalistic driving data can be helpful in addressing some of the limitations of existing data sources related to the incidence of hydroplaning. Method: Data from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study were leveraged to estimate the incidence of hydroplaning. Two hydroplaning detection algorithms were used for candidate hydroplaning event generation. Hard braking events were also identified and analyzed as normative comparisons to the hydroplaning events. Results: A total of 1,141 hydroplaning events were found in the naturalistic driving data and utilized for analysis, including 650 hydroplaning events that were unnoticeable by the driver based on lack of observable reactions, 13 events that were deemed to be of “critical” severity, and only 3 events that resulted in crash events during more than 30 million miles of driving. Hard braking events occurred nearly four times more often, and at comparatively lower speeds, than hydroplaning events. Observable driver reactions also differed between event types. For example, more drivers changed their posture after a hydroplaning event than after a hard braking event and drivers maintained both hands on the wheel at higher rates after experiencing a hydroplaning event than after a hard braking event. Suspension of secondary tasks during hard braking and hydroplaning events was also observed. Conclusions: Overall, these findings suggest that drivers perceive hydroplaning events as more harmful than hard braking events, despite the large discrepancy and incompatibility in how often these driving situations lead to vehicular crashes. Practical application: The findings of this research will provide vehicle and tire designers with empirical data that quantifies the important tradeoffs they must make in balancing vehicle and tire performance in wet and dry environments, and in tradeoffs related to tire wear performance and grip.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用自然驾驶数据确定水滑事件的发生率
导言:在真实世界条件下发生水浸的程度尚不完全清楚。自然驾驶数据有助于解决现有数据源在水浸发生率方面的一些局限性。方法:利用第二次公路战略研究计划自然驾驶研究的数据来估算水浸发生率。使用两种水浸检测算法生成候选水浸事件。此外,还确定并分析了硬制动事件,作为与水浸事件的标准对比。结果:在自然驾驶数据中发现并用于分析的水浸事件共有 1,141 起,其中包括 650 起驾驶员因缺乏可观察到的反应而无法察觉的水浸事件、13 起被视为 "严重 "的水浸事件,以及在超过 3,000 万英里的驾驶里程中仅有 3 起导致碰撞事件的水浸事件。与水滑事故相比,急刹车事故的发生率要高出近四倍,而且车速相对较低。可观察到的驾驶员反应也因事件类型而异。例如,与急刹车相比,更多的驾驶员在发生水滑事故后会改变姿势;与急刹车相比,驾驶员在发生水滑事故后将双手放在方向盘上的比例更高。此外,还观察到驾驶员在急刹车和侧滑事件中暂停了次要任务。结论:总体而言,这些研究结果表明,驾驶员认为侧滑事件比急刹车事件更有害,尽管在这些驾驶情况导致车辆碰撞的频率上存在巨大差异和不一致性。实际应用:这项研究的结果将为车辆和轮胎设计师提供经验数据,量化他们在干湿环境中平衡车辆和轮胎性能时必须做出的重要权衡,以及与轮胎磨损性能和抓地力相关的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Trends in parcel delivery driver injury: Evidence from NEISS-Work Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed U.S. workers within the Construction sector, 2010–2019 Safety climate and fatigue have differential impacts on safety issues Great to use as a conversation starter: End user views on the acceptability and feasibility of a prototype decision aid for older drivers Investigating perspectives towards online content that promotes road safety: A qualitative study across three age groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1