Evaluating private car users’ preference to congestion pricing: A study on trip cancellation behavior

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101300
{"title":"Evaluating private car users’ preference to congestion pricing: A study on trip cancellation behavior","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People show different behaviors when facing congestion pricing policy. A literature review reveals that the variables affecting behaviors such as trip cancellation in the case of the implementation of transportation demand management (TDM) policies have received less attention. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of travelers’ characteristics, citizens’ attitudes towards TDM policies, socioeconomic variables, and five TDM policies on trip cancellation behavior among private car users entering congestion charge zones. The statistical population contained 2256 participants; each participant answered six scenarios resulting in 13,536 observations. The use of Stated Preference method is employed to identify the preferences of citizens of Shiraz as a case study. The binary logit model indicated that travelers who had to make essential trips would be less likely to cancel their trips. Also, those who strongly agreed with the idea that congestion pricing could restrict their travel mode choice and those who strongly disagreed that congestion pricing could reduce traffic congestion would be most likely to cancel their trips compared to people with other attitudes. In addition, every minute increase in the time spent in congestion charge zones could decrease the travelers’ tendency to cancel their trips by 0.13%. Likewise, every 10,000 Rials ($0.09) increase in congestion charge could increase the probability of trip cancellation by 0.31%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X2400155X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People show different behaviors when facing congestion pricing policy. A literature review reveals that the variables affecting behaviors such as trip cancellation in the case of the implementation of transportation demand management (TDM) policies have received less attention. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of travelers’ characteristics, citizens’ attitudes towards TDM policies, socioeconomic variables, and five TDM policies on trip cancellation behavior among private car users entering congestion charge zones. The statistical population contained 2256 participants; each participant answered six scenarios resulting in 13,536 observations. The use of Stated Preference method is employed to identify the preferences of citizens of Shiraz as a case study. The binary logit model indicated that travelers who had to make essential trips would be less likely to cancel their trips. Also, those who strongly agreed with the idea that congestion pricing could restrict their travel mode choice and those who strongly disagreed that congestion pricing could reduce traffic congestion would be most likely to cancel their trips compared to people with other attitudes. In addition, every minute increase in the time spent in congestion charge zones could decrease the travelers’ tendency to cancel their trips by 0.13%. Likewise, every 10,000 Rials ($0.09) increase in congestion charge could increase the probability of trip cancellation by 0.31%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估私家车用户对拥堵费的偏好:关于取消行程行为的研究
人们在面对拥堵定价政策时会表现出不同的行为。文献综述显示,在实施交通需求管理(TDM)政策的情况下,影响取消行程等行为的变量受到的关注较少。因此,本研究旨在探讨出行者特征、市民对交通需求管理政策的态度、社会经济变量以及五项交通需求管理政策对私家车用户进入拥堵收费区取消行程行为的影响。统计人群包括 2256 名参与者,每位参与者回答了六个情景,共得到 13536 个观测值。以设拉子市民的偏好为研究案例,采用了陈述偏好法。二元对数模型表明,必须进行必要旅行的旅行者取消旅行的可能性较小。此外,与持其他态度的人相比,非常同意拥堵费可以限制其出行方式选择的人和非常不同意拥堵费可以减少交通拥堵的人最有可能取消出行。此外,在拥堵收费区所花费的时间每增加一分钟,就会使旅行者取消旅行的倾向降低 0.13%。同样,拥堵费每增加 10,000 里亚尔(0.09 美元),取消行程的可能性就会增加 0.31%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Fuelling the pandemic: The impact of fuel prices on COVID-19 COVID-19 and its influence on the propensity to work from home between March 2020 and June 2021 Simulation modeling of passengers flow at airport terminals to reduce delay and enhance level of service Optimization of transport sustainability index to conserve resources: A case study of Delhi, India The effect of airline service quality, perceived value, emotional attachment, and brand loyalty on passengers’ willingness to pay: The moderating role of airline origin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1