Catherine M. Fallon , Clare A. Corish , Katy Horner , Caitriona Cunningham
{"title":"Personalized approaches to the prescription of protein-based oral nutritional supplements in older adults: A scoping review","authors":"Catherine M. Fallon , Clare A. Corish , Katy Horner , Caitriona Cunningham","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are prescribed for older adults with malnutrition and sarcopenia to prevent nutritional and functional deterioration. Studies investigating ONS effectiveness commonly provide the same ONS prescription for participants. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of studies that have personalized ONS prescription in older adults with malnutrition or sarcopenia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In July 2023, PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS and EMBASE were searched for studies wherein older adults with malnutrition, risk of malnutrition or sarcopenia received personalized ONS. Data extracted were synthesized into tables and descriptively summarized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, all in developed countries: 10 randomized controlled, 3 cross-over, 1 non-randomized and 1 single-arm trials. Fourteen studies included older adults at risk of malnutrition/malnourished. One study included older adults with sarcopenia. Studies included between 34 and 671 participants aged 70–88 years. Dietitians (10 studies) or trained nutritionists (5 studies) personalized the ONS prescription. Personalization included: (i) providing ONS for protein requirements based on weight (11 studies) or (ii) current dietary intake (2 studies), or (iii) offering ONS flavors based on personal preference (2 studies). Outcome measures included nutritional status, change in body weight/composition and quality of life. Definition and methods of assessing adherence varied. Seven studies showed a significant improvement in primary outcomes when personalized ONS were prescribed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>15 studies which personalized ONS for older adults with malnutrition/sarcopenia were identified. Further research on optimizing personalized approaches with standardized outcome measures is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 80-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims
Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are prescribed for older adults with malnutrition and sarcopenia to prevent nutritional and functional deterioration. Studies investigating ONS effectiveness commonly provide the same ONS prescription for participants. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of studies that have personalized ONS prescription in older adults with malnutrition or sarcopenia.
Methods
In July 2023, PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS and EMBASE were searched for studies wherein older adults with malnutrition, risk of malnutrition or sarcopenia received personalized ONS. Data extracted were synthesized into tables and descriptively summarized.
Results
Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, all in developed countries: 10 randomized controlled, 3 cross-over, 1 non-randomized and 1 single-arm trials. Fourteen studies included older adults at risk of malnutrition/malnourished. One study included older adults with sarcopenia. Studies included between 34 and 671 participants aged 70–88 years. Dietitians (10 studies) or trained nutritionists (5 studies) personalized the ONS prescription. Personalization included: (i) providing ONS for protein requirements based on weight (11 studies) or (ii) current dietary intake (2 studies), or (iii) offering ONS flavors based on personal preference (2 studies). Outcome measures included nutritional status, change in body weight/composition and quality of life. Definition and methods of assessing adherence varied. Seven studies showed a significant improvement in primary outcomes when personalized ONS were prescribed.
Conclusion
15 studies which personalized ONS for older adults with malnutrition/sarcopenia were identified. Further research on optimizing personalized approaches with standardized outcome measures is warranted.