How do relational practices co-constitute care for people who use drugs? The social and political dimensions of peer-led harm reduction

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104614
Timothy Piatkowski , Kate Seear , Steph Reeve , Emma Kill
{"title":"How do relational practices co-constitute care for people who use drugs? The social and political dimensions of peer-led harm reduction","authors":"Timothy Piatkowski ,&nbsp;Kate Seear ,&nbsp;Steph Reeve ,&nbsp;Emma Kill","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>People who use drugs have a long history of mobilising to reduce harm within their communities, significantly influencing harm reduction efforts globally. Peers with lived experience contribute through needle exchange programs, harm reduction education, and community-based research. Despite facing stigma, their initiatives have generated multiple benefits for communities. Collaborations between peers and researchers are increasingly recognised, emphasising meaningful participation in decisions affecting their lives. This paper focuses on the role of peers in mitigating drug-related risks and harms through community care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 people who use drugs, exploring peer support and harm reduction. Data were analysed by the lead author and a coding framework was developed in which key theme-categories were organised. Theoretical framing from science and technology studies informed analysis, recognising the political dimensions of research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Peers play a crucial role in bridging gaps in formal services, offering stigma-free, relational care spaces. These spaces, both physical and social, affirm dignity and solidarity, countering marginalisation. Participants highlight the importance of peer involvement in driving change, promoting safer use practices, and advocating for a holistic harm reduction approach that considers systemic factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our data highlight the vital role of peer connections and peer-led harm reduction practices in fostering safety, solidarity, and connection among communities of people who use drugs. Future research should continue to explore peer-led initiatives within evolving healthcare contexts, considering broader social dynamics and employing innovative conceptual frameworks to promote equitable peer-led harm reduction strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

People who use drugs have a long history of mobilising to reduce harm within their communities, significantly influencing harm reduction efforts globally. Peers with lived experience contribute through needle exchange programs, harm reduction education, and community-based research. Despite facing stigma, their initiatives have generated multiple benefits for communities. Collaborations between peers and researchers are increasingly recognised, emphasising meaningful participation in decisions affecting their lives. This paper focuses on the role of peers in mitigating drug-related risks and harms through community care.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 people who use drugs, exploring peer support and harm reduction. Data were analysed by the lead author and a coding framework was developed in which key theme-categories were organised. Theoretical framing from science and technology studies informed analysis, recognising the political dimensions of research.

Results

Peers play a crucial role in bridging gaps in formal services, offering stigma-free, relational care spaces. These spaces, both physical and social, affirm dignity and solidarity, countering marginalisation. Participants highlight the importance of peer involvement in driving change, promoting safer use practices, and advocating for a holistic harm reduction approach that considers systemic factors.

Conclusions

Our data highlight the vital role of peer connections and peer-led harm reduction practices in fostering safety, solidarity, and connection among communities of people who use drugs. Future research should continue to explore peer-led initiatives within evolving healthcare contexts, considering broader social dynamics and employing innovative conceptual frameworks to promote equitable peer-led harm reduction strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系实践如何共同构成对吸毒者的关怀?同伴减低伤害的社会和政治层面
导言:长期以来,吸毒者一直在其社区内动员起来减少伤害,对全球的减低伤害工作产生了重大影响。有亲身经历的吸毒者通过针具交换项目、减低伤害教育和社区研究做出了贡献。尽管面临污名化,但他们的举措为社区带来了多重益处。同龄人与研究人员之间的合作日益得到认可,强调有意义地参与影响其生活的决策。本文重点探讨了同伴在通过社区关怀减轻与毒品有关的风险和危害方面所起的作用。方法对 30 名吸毒者进行了半结构式访谈,探讨同伴支持和减轻危害的问题。主要作者对数据进行了分析,并制定了一个编码框架,在此框架内组织了关键的主题类别。来自科学和技术研究的理论框架为分析提供了依据,同时也认识到了研究的政治层面。这些空间,无论是物质空间还是社会空间,都肯定了尊严和团结,消除了边缘化。参与者强调了同伴参与在推动变革、促进更安全的使用方式以及倡导考虑系统性因素的整体减低伤害方法方面的重要性。结论我们的数据强调了同伴联系和同伴主导的减低伤害实践在促进吸毒者社区的安全、团结和联系方面的重要作用。未来的研究应继续探索在不断变化的医疗保健背景下同伴主导的倡议,考虑更广泛的社会动态,并采用创新的概念框架来促进公平的同伴主导减低伤害策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022 Suboptimal uptake and placement of a mandatory alcohol pregnancy warning label in Australia Increases in employment over six months following Khanya: A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered behavioral intervention for substance use and HIV medication adherence in Cape Town, South Africa The criminal careers of Australian drug traffickers Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis cultivation and use in 18 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1