Stewart Lockie , Henry A. Bartelet , Brent W. Ritchie , Csilla Demeter , Bruce Taylor , Lintje Sie
{"title":"Australians support multi-pronged action to build ecosystem resilience in the Great Barrier Reef","authors":"Stewart Lockie , Henry A. Bartelet , Brent W. Ritchie , Csilla Demeter , Bruce Taylor , Lintje Sie","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The scale and pace of global environmental change calls for a dramatic upscaling of ecosystem restoration and for actions that build the resilience of ecosystems to future environmental change. This research aimed to quantify public perceptions of threats to the health of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia, and their support for strategies to address those threats including large-scale restoration and resilience-building actions. We examine how these perceptions change over time and across social cohorts including people living closer to the Reef (<em>n</em> = 2621) and the general Australian population (<em>n</em> = 5825). Respondents were concerned about both the current state and future of the GBR. They identified climate change as the largest threat to the GBR with the strength of this perception increasing between 2018 and 2022. Respondents were ambivalent about existing management and overwhelmingly of the view that more should be done to save the GBR. Strong support was expressed for a range of responses including preventing threats, local restoration, measures to increase the resilience of the GBR to future threats, providing more research funding, and large-scale restoration. Trust in science to develop solutions for Reef protection and repair was high and strongly correlated with support for action. The results suggest that ongoing scientifically-informed action – underpinned by deep engagement with impacted communities and stakeholders and the full, prior and informed consent of rights-holders including First Nations – is needed to build public confidence in Reef management and the deployment of technological interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"299 ","pages":"Article 110789"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724003513","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The scale and pace of global environmental change calls for a dramatic upscaling of ecosystem restoration and for actions that build the resilience of ecosystems to future environmental change. This research aimed to quantify public perceptions of threats to the health of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia, and their support for strategies to address those threats including large-scale restoration and resilience-building actions. We examine how these perceptions change over time and across social cohorts including people living closer to the Reef (n = 2621) and the general Australian population (n = 5825). Respondents were concerned about both the current state and future of the GBR. They identified climate change as the largest threat to the GBR with the strength of this perception increasing between 2018 and 2022. Respondents were ambivalent about existing management and overwhelmingly of the view that more should be done to save the GBR. Strong support was expressed for a range of responses including preventing threats, local restoration, measures to increase the resilience of the GBR to future threats, providing more research funding, and large-scale restoration. Trust in science to develop solutions for Reef protection and repair was high and strongly correlated with support for action. The results suggest that ongoing scientifically-informed action – underpinned by deep engagement with impacted communities and stakeholders and the full, prior and informed consent of rights-holders including First Nations – is needed to build public confidence in Reef management and the deployment of technological interventions.
期刊介绍:
Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.