In ovo administration of L. animalis, B. licheniformis, or their combination influences Ross 708 broiler chick hatch performance and immuno-physiological parameters
{"title":"In ovo administration of L. animalis, B. licheniformis, or their combination influences Ross 708 broiler chick hatch performance and immuno-physiological parameters","authors":"C.N. Beck , K.G.S. Wamsley , C.D. McDaniel , A.S. Kiess","doi":"10.1016/j.japr.2024.100481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a demand for novel pathogen mitigation strategies in antibiotic-free poultry production, which has triggered the development of various probiotic application methods. One application method is the <em>in ovo</em> (in egg) administration of probiotics on incubation day (<strong>d</strong>) 18, where the unhatched chick consumes a probiotic before hatch and prior to being exposed to environmental pathogens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of <em>in ovo L. animalis, B. licheniformis</em>, or <em>L. animalis + B. licheniformis</em> (10<sup>6</sup> cfu/50 μL each) administration on hatch performance (N = 21 egg flats/treatment, 30 eggs/flat), live performance (N = 12 pens/treatment), and d of hatch immuno-physiological parameters (N = 12 birds/treatment) among Ross 708 broiler chicks. Data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA with significance established at <em>P</em> ≤ 0.05. All <em>in ovo</em> probiotic treatments had greater % hatch than the control treatment, and eggs in ovo-administered with <em>B. licheniformis</em> had lower % late dead and % culled-pipped eggs. However, all <em>in ovo</em> probiotic treatments had lower average chick weights compared to those of the HVT vaccine control group. At hatch, chicks administered with <em>B. licheniformis</em> or <em>L. animalis + B. licheniformis</em> had greater relative ceca weight and lower peripheral blood leukocyte levels compared to those belonging to the control group. There were no effects on live performance during the first 2 wk post-hatch. These results show that <em>B. licheniformis</em> and <em>L. animalis</em> are effective candidates for <em>in ovo</em> probiotic administration, but further investigations regarding immuno-physiological responses to <em>in ovo B. licheniformis</em> administration are necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","volume":"33 4","pages":"Article 100481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Poultry Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a demand for novel pathogen mitigation strategies in antibiotic-free poultry production, which has triggered the development of various probiotic application methods. One application method is the in ovo (in egg) administration of probiotics on incubation day (d) 18, where the unhatched chick consumes a probiotic before hatch and prior to being exposed to environmental pathogens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of in ovo L. animalis, B. licheniformis, or L. animalis + B. licheniformis (106 cfu/50 μL each) administration on hatch performance (N = 21 egg flats/treatment, 30 eggs/flat), live performance (N = 12 pens/treatment), and d of hatch immuno-physiological parameters (N = 12 birds/treatment) among Ross 708 broiler chicks. Data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA with significance established at P ≤ 0.05. All in ovo probiotic treatments had greater % hatch than the control treatment, and eggs in ovo-administered with B. licheniformis had lower % late dead and % culled-pipped eggs. However, all in ovo probiotic treatments had lower average chick weights compared to those of the HVT vaccine control group. At hatch, chicks administered with B. licheniformis or L. animalis + B. licheniformis had greater relative ceca weight and lower peripheral blood leukocyte levels compared to those belonging to the control group. There were no effects on live performance during the first 2 wk post-hatch. These results show that B. licheniformis and L. animalis are effective candidates for in ovo probiotic administration, but further investigations regarding immuno-physiological responses to in ovo B. licheniformis administration are necessary.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Poultry Research (JAPR) publishes original research reports, field reports, and reviews on breeding, hatching, health and disease, layer management, meat bird processing and products, meat bird management, microbiology, food safety, nutrition, environment, sanitation, welfare, and economics. As of January 2020, JAPR will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers.
The readers of JAPR are in education, extension, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, veterinary medicine, management, production, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Nutritionists, breeder flock supervisors, production managers, microbiologists, laboratory personnel, food safety and sanitation managers, poultry processing managers, feed manufacturers, and egg producers use JAPR to keep up with current applied poultry research.