A comparison of meteorological normalization of PM2.5 by multiple linear regression, general additive model, and random forest methods

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Environment Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120854
Ling Qi , Haotian Zheng , Dian Ding , Shuxiao Wang
{"title":"A comparison of meteorological normalization of PM2.5 by multiple linear regression, general additive model, and random forest methods","authors":"Ling Qi ,&nbsp;Haotian Zheng ,&nbsp;Dian Ding ,&nbsp;Shuxiao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>PM<sub>2.5</sub> is still one of the major atmospheric pollutants worldwide. Extracting contributions of anthropogenic emission control from the observed PM<sub>2.5</sub> variations (PM<sub>2.5_anth</sub>), which are also strongly affected by meteorological changes, is critical for effective pollution control. Statistical and machine learning methods are usually used for such purpose, but the effectiveness of these methods is hard to evaluate due to the lack of observed anthropogenic contributions. In this study, we use the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem standard simulation to mimic PM<sub>2.5</sub> variability in the real atmosphere, and use the model simulation with fixed meteorological fields as the “true value” for PM<sub>2.5_anth</sub>. We evaluate the effectiveness of three methods in meteorological normalization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> on decadal (2006–2017) and synoptic (one month) scale: multiple linear regression (MLR), general additive model (GAM), and random forest (RF) algorithm. For meteorological normalization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> on decadal scale, 67–72% of the MLR simulations show positive biases and 56–75% of the RF simulations show negative biases. The “true value” of PM<sub>2.5_anth</sub> falls within the range of meteorological normalization results of the three methods in most cases, but consistent positive/negative biases are observed in ∼30% of the cases, when meteorological changes dominate PM<sub>2.5</sub> variability. In addition, the biases are correlated to the contribution of meteorological changes. As such, multiple statistical or machine learning methods are recommended to quantify the uncertainties associated with method choice in cases anthropogenic emission changes dominate PM<sub>2.5</sub> variability. On synoptic scale, RF performs better in reproducing the daily variations of the PM<sub>2.5_anth</sub> differences than MLR (GAM) in all (83% of) the cases, and is recommended for meteorological normalization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in short-term in eastern China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 120854"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231024005296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PM2.5 is still one of the major atmospheric pollutants worldwide. Extracting contributions of anthropogenic emission control from the observed PM2.5 variations (PM2.5_anth), which are also strongly affected by meteorological changes, is critical for effective pollution control. Statistical and machine learning methods are usually used for such purpose, but the effectiveness of these methods is hard to evaluate due to the lack of observed anthropogenic contributions. In this study, we use the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem standard simulation to mimic PM2.5 variability in the real atmosphere, and use the model simulation with fixed meteorological fields as the “true value” for PM2.5_anth. We evaluate the effectiveness of three methods in meteorological normalization of PM2.5 on decadal (2006–2017) and synoptic (one month) scale: multiple linear regression (MLR), general additive model (GAM), and random forest (RF) algorithm. For meteorological normalization of PM2.5 on decadal scale, 67–72% of the MLR simulations show positive biases and 56–75% of the RF simulations show negative biases. The “true value” of PM2.5_anth falls within the range of meteorological normalization results of the three methods in most cases, but consistent positive/negative biases are observed in ∼30% of the cases, when meteorological changes dominate PM2.5 variability. In addition, the biases are correlated to the contribution of meteorological changes. As such, multiple statistical or machine learning methods are recommended to quantify the uncertainties associated with method choice in cases anthropogenic emission changes dominate PM2.5 variability. On synoptic scale, RF performs better in reproducing the daily variations of the PM2.5_anth differences than MLR (GAM) in all (83% of) the cases, and is recommended for meteorological normalization of PM2.5 in short-term in eastern China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过多元线性回归、一般加法模型和随机森林方法对 PM2.5 气象归一化进行比较
PM2.5 仍然是全球主要大气污染物之一。从观测到的 PM2.5 变化(PM2.5_anth)中提取人为排放控制的贡献对于有效的污染控制至关重要,而 PM2.5 也受到气象变化的强烈影响。统计和机器学习方法通常用于此目的,但由于缺乏观测到的人为贡献,这些方法的有效性很难评估。在本研究中,我们使用化学传输模型 GEOS-Chem 标准模拟来模仿真实大气中 PM2.5 的变化,并使用固定气象场的模型模拟作为 PM2.5_anth 的 "真实值"。我们评估了在十年尺度(2006-2017 年)和同步尺度(一个月)上对 PM2.5 进行气象归一化的三种方法的有效性:多元线性回归(MLR)、一般加法模型(GAM)和随机森林算法(RF)。对于十年尺度 PM2.5 的气象归一化,67-72% 的 MLR 模拟显示正偏差,56-75% 的 RF 模拟显示负偏差。在大多数情况下,PM2.5_anth 的 "真实值 "在三种方法的气象归一化结果范围内,但在气象变化主导 PM2.5 变化的情况下,有 30% 的情况下观察到一致的正/负偏差。此外,偏差与气象变化的贡献相关。因此,在人为排放变化主导 PM2.5 变异的情况下,建议采用多种统计或机器学习方法来量化与方法选择相关的不确定性。在天气尺度上,RF 在所有(83% 的)情况下都比 MLR(GAM)更好地再现了 PM2.5_anth 差值的日变化,因此推荐用于中国东部地区 PM2.5 的短期气象归一化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
137Cs in outdoor air due to Chernobyl-contaminated wood combustion for residential heating in Thessaloniki, North Greece Reaction between peracetic acid and carbonyl oxide: Quantitative kinetics and insight into implications in the atmosphere Aerosol retrievals derived from a low-cost Calitoo sun-photometer taken on board a research vessel Development of an online cloud fog monitor: Design, laboratory, and field deployment at an unoccupied coastal site in Eastern China The coupling model of random forest and interpretable method quantifies the response relationship between PM2.5 and influencing factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1