Validation of the Virtual Reality Stroop Room: Effects of inhibiting interfering information under time-pressure and task-switching demands

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in human behavior reports Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100497
{"title":"Validation of the Virtual Reality Stroop Room: Effects of inhibiting interfering information under time-pressure and task-switching demands","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The physiological stress response affects executive functions, such as inhibition, as assessed by the Stroop Color and Word Test. In this study, we investigated the effects of the Virtual Reality Stroop Room (VRSR), a research paradigm assessing these cognitive top-down processes while inducing mild acute stress, on self-reported stress states, heart rate, salivary alpha-amylase, and cortisol. Our sample consisted of 89 participants (52 women; Age: 23.60 ± 3.88 years) and was evenly allocated to the three conditions of the VRSR (<em>regular, time pressure,</em> and <em>rotation</em>). The Stroop Effect, reflected in prolonged processing times and increased errors in the incongruent phase, was observed. Participants reported heightened <em>Distress</em> and <em>Engagement</em> post-experiment, alongside lower <em>Worry</em>, assessed via the Short Stress State Questionnaire. Scores from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule indicated elevated positive affect and decreased negative affect post-study. With regard to biosignals we found that heart rate was higher in the incongruent phase, compared to the congruent phase and a significant time × condition interaction was observed. Salivary alpha-amylase exhibited a significant time effect. Results for cortisol do not support a uniform response of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. In conclusion, the VRSR appears to be a valid measure for executive functions while activating the sympathetic nervous system, but not the HPA axis. Its current implementation induces mild physiological and psychological stress responses, with fewer adverse reactions compared to the Trier Social Stress Test. Future studies should leverage the adaptability of virtual reality applications to refine this research paradigm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958824001301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The physiological stress response affects executive functions, such as inhibition, as assessed by the Stroop Color and Word Test. In this study, we investigated the effects of the Virtual Reality Stroop Room (VRSR), a research paradigm assessing these cognitive top-down processes while inducing mild acute stress, on self-reported stress states, heart rate, salivary alpha-amylase, and cortisol. Our sample consisted of 89 participants (52 women; Age: 23.60 ± 3.88 years) and was evenly allocated to the three conditions of the VRSR (regular, time pressure, and rotation). The Stroop Effect, reflected in prolonged processing times and increased errors in the incongruent phase, was observed. Participants reported heightened Distress and Engagement post-experiment, alongside lower Worry, assessed via the Short Stress State Questionnaire. Scores from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule indicated elevated positive affect and decreased negative affect post-study. With regard to biosignals we found that heart rate was higher in the incongruent phase, compared to the congruent phase and a significant time × condition interaction was observed. Salivary alpha-amylase exhibited a significant time effect. Results for cortisol do not support a uniform response of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. In conclusion, the VRSR appears to be a valid measure for executive functions while activating the sympathetic nervous system, but not the HPA axis. Its current implementation induces mild physiological and psychological stress responses, with fewer adverse reactions compared to the Trier Social Stress Test. Future studies should leverage the adaptability of virtual reality applications to refine this research paradigm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实 Stroop 房间的验证:时间压力和任务切换需求下抑制干扰信息的效果
生理应激反应会影响执行功能,例如抑制功能,这可以通过施特罗普色彩和文字测试来评估。在本研究中,我们调查了虚拟现实 Stroop 室(VRSR)对自我报告的压力状态、心率、唾液α-淀粉酶和皮质醇的影响,虚拟现实 Stroop 室是一种评估这些自上而下认知过程的研究范式,同时会诱发轻度急性压力。我们的样本包括 89 名参与者(52 名女性;年龄:23.60 ± 3.88 岁),他们被平均分配到 VRSR 的三个条件中(常规、时间压力和旋转)。实验中观察到了 Stroop 效应,即在不一致阶段处理时间延长,错误增加。实验后,受试者的苦恼和参与度均有所提高,同时,通过短期压力状态问卷评估,受试者的担忧程度也有所降低。积极和消极情绪表的得分表明,实验后积极情绪升高,消极情绪降低。在生物信号方面,我们发现不协调阶段的心率比协调阶段高,并且观察到了显著的时间×条件交互作用。唾液中的α-淀粉酶表现出明显的时间效应。皮质醇的结果不支持下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴的统一反应。总之,在激活交感神经系统而非 HPA 轴的同时,VRSR 似乎是一项有效的执行功能测试。与特里尔社会压力测试相比,目前的实施方法能诱发轻微的生理和心理压力反应,不良反应较少。未来的研究应利用虚拟现实应用的适应性来完善这一研究范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between regulatory processes and problematic social media use: A systematic review Virtual reality based executive function training in schools: The experience of primary school-aged children, teachers and training teaching assistants Trust and distrust coexistence and change in the adoption of an emerging technology in organizations Computer use and cardiovascular risk biomarkers in midlife and older adults Global research trends on cyberbullying: A bibliometric study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1