Self-efficacy inertia: The role of competency beliefs and academic burden in achievement

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Contemporary Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102315
Sarah M. Wolff , Jonathan C. Hilpert , Vanessa W. Vongkulluksn , Matthew L. Bernacki , Jeffrey A. Greene
{"title":"Self-efficacy inertia: The role of competency beliefs and academic burden in achievement","authors":"Sarah M. Wolff ,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Hilpert ,&nbsp;Vanessa W. Vongkulluksn ,&nbsp;Matthew L. Bernacki ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Greene","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effort to translate self-efficacy theory into statistical models has been argued to model out the complex, dynamic nature of the interaction between the person and the environment. This study aimed to understand how self-efficacy (belief in one’s abilities) and academic burden (the external challenges students face in their studies) relate to academic performance over time and whether modeling both between and within subject variance components provides a more comprehensive perspective that is better aligned with theory. Self-efficacy and academic burden were collected at five time points, one month apart from undergraduate students (<em>N</em> = 443) enrolled in an online biology class. The data were fit to four models: 1) a standard cross lagged panel model (CLPM), 2) a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), 3) an RI-CLPM in which grade was regressed on the random-intercepts, and 4) an RI-CLPM in which grade was regressed on the random-intercepts and the within-person fluctuations. The RI-CLPM was a better fit to the data over the CLPM, indicating that separating effects that are attributed to individual differences from within-person effects appears to better capture the reciprocal relationships between self-efficacy and academic burden. Further, when only the general tendencies of self-efficacy and academic burden were specified to predict final grade, there was a significant positive relationship between self-efficacy and grades. However, when within-person variations over time were added as predictors in addition to the between-person differences, this general relationship lost significance. These findings suggest that gaining self-efficacy momentum in a class is perhaps more predictive of academic achievement than having a general tendency towards confidence in one’s abilities relative to peers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000602","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effort to translate self-efficacy theory into statistical models has been argued to model out the complex, dynamic nature of the interaction between the person and the environment. This study aimed to understand how self-efficacy (belief in one’s abilities) and academic burden (the external challenges students face in their studies) relate to academic performance over time and whether modeling both between and within subject variance components provides a more comprehensive perspective that is better aligned with theory. Self-efficacy and academic burden were collected at five time points, one month apart from undergraduate students (N = 443) enrolled in an online biology class. The data were fit to four models: 1) a standard cross lagged panel model (CLPM), 2) a random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), 3) an RI-CLPM in which grade was regressed on the random-intercepts, and 4) an RI-CLPM in which grade was regressed on the random-intercepts and the within-person fluctuations. The RI-CLPM was a better fit to the data over the CLPM, indicating that separating effects that are attributed to individual differences from within-person effects appears to better capture the reciprocal relationships between self-efficacy and academic burden. Further, when only the general tendencies of self-efficacy and academic burden were specified to predict final grade, there was a significant positive relationship between self-efficacy and grades. However, when within-person variations over time were added as predictors in addition to the between-person differences, this general relationship lost significance. These findings suggest that gaining self-efficacy momentum in a class is perhaps more predictive of academic achievement than having a general tendency towards confidence in one’s abilities relative to peers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我效能惰性:能力信念和学业负担对成绩的影响
将自我效能感理论转化为统计模型的努力被认为是为了模拟出人与环境之间复杂、动态的互动性质。本研究旨在了解自我效能感(对自身能力的信念)和学业负担(学生在学习中面临的外部挑战)与学业成绩的关系,以及学科间和学科内变异成分建模是否能提供更全面、更符合理论的视角。我们在五个时间点收集了自我效能感和学业负担的数据,这些数据来自参加在线生物课的本科生(人数 = 443),时间点相隔一个月。数据被拟合到四个模型中:1)标准交叉滞后面板模型(CLPM);2)随机截距交叉滞后面板模型(RI-CLPM);3)成绩对随机截距进行回归的 RI-CLPM 模型;4)成绩对随机截距和人内波动进行回归的 RI-CLPM 模型。与 CLPM 相比,RI-CLPM 更好地拟合了数据,这表明将个体差异效应与人内效应分开似乎能更好地捕捉自我效能感与学业负担之间的相互关系。此外,当只用自我效能感和学业负担的一般倾向来预测最终成绩时,自我效能感和成绩之间存在显著的正相关关系。然而,如果除了人与人之间的差异外,再加上人与人之间随时间的变化作为预测因素,这种一般关系就失去了意义。这些研究结果表明,在班级中获得自我效能感的动力也许比对自己的能力相对于同龄人的普遍自信更能预测学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
期刊最新文献
It’s not all about recognition and Influence: The role of communal and agentic goals and motives in science for diverse high school students Three applications of semantic network analysis to individual student think-aloud data An exploratory experiment investigating teachers’ attributional race and gender bias and the moderating effects of personal experience of racial discrimination How much active teaching should be incorporated into college course lectures to promote active learning? Self-efficacy inertia: The role of competency beliefs and academic burden in achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1