Empathy mitigates the relationship between ageism and subjective age in late life

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101273
Assaf Suberry , Ehud Bodner
{"title":"Empathy mitigates the relationship between ageism and subjective age in late life","authors":"Assaf Suberry ,&nbsp;Ehud Bodner","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study corresponds with a dispute in gerontology literature about whether a younger subjective age acts as a psychological defense for older adults by perceiving themselves as younger in order to dissociate from their age-group or as a marker of good physical health. This cross-sectional study presents a preliminary step to clarify this dispute. We examined the role of emotional empathy (measured by the Multifaceted Empathy Test) as a moderator in the ageism (measured implicitly by the Brief Implicit Association Test) and subjective age (measured on Likert scale) association on a convenience sample of 203 community-dwelling older adults (aged 65–90, <em>M =</em> 74.54, <em>SD =</em> 6.76). It was hypothesized that implicit ageism would be associated with younger subjective age and that this association would be only evident among older adults with lower emotional empathy. Implicit ageism was not associated with younger subjective age. As expected, hierarchical linear regression showed that the connection between higher implicit ageism and a younger subjective age remains significant (<em>p</em> = 0.012) only among participants with lower emotional empathy (∆<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.022, <em>β = 0</em>.156). Higher emotional empathy was associated with younger subjective age. For older adults who are equipped with the ability to feel others' emotions, the defensive dissociation between self and other perceptions of aging might be unnecessary. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 101273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study corresponds with a dispute in gerontology literature about whether a younger subjective age acts as a psychological defense for older adults by perceiving themselves as younger in order to dissociate from their age-group or as a marker of good physical health. This cross-sectional study presents a preliminary step to clarify this dispute. We examined the role of emotional empathy (measured by the Multifaceted Empathy Test) as a moderator in the ageism (measured implicitly by the Brief Implicit Association Test) and subjective age (measured on Likert scale) association on a convenience sample of 203 community-dwelling older adults (aged 65–90, M = 74.54, SD = 6.76). It was hypothesized that implicit ageism would be associated with younger subjective age and that this association would be only evident among older adults with lower emotional empathy. Implicit ageism was not associated with younger subjective age. As expected, hierarchical linear regression showed that the connection between higher implicit ageism and a younger subjective age remains significant (p = 0.012) only among participants with lower emotional empathy (∆R2 = 0.022, β = 0.156). Higher emotional empathy was associated with younger subjective age. For older adults who are equipped with the ability to feel others' emotions, the defensive dissociation between self and other perceptions of aging might be unnecessary. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移情能缓解年龄歧视与晚年主观年龄之间的关系
这项研究与老年学文献中的一个争议相吻合,即主观年龄的年轻化是老年人的一种心理防御手段,通过认为自己更年轻来脱离同龄人,还是作为身体健康的标志。这项横断面研究为澄清这一争议迈出了第一步。我们研究了情感共鸣(通过多方面共鸣测试测量)在年龄歧视(通过简短内隐联想测试测量)和主观年龄(通过李克特量表测量)关联中的调节作用,研究对象是 203 名社区老年人(年龄在 65-90 岁之间,中 = 74.54,标 = 6.76)。根据假设,内隐年龄歧视与较年轻的主观年龄有关,而且这种关联只在情感共鸣较低的老年人中明显。内隐年龄歧视与年龄较小的主观年龄无关。正如预期的那样,分层线性回归结果表明,只有在情感共鸣较低的参与者中,较高的内隐年龄歧视与较小的主观年龄之间的关系仍然显著(p = 0.012)(∆R2 = 0.022,β = 0.156)。情感共鸣越高,主观年龄越小。对于有能力感受他人情绪的老年人来说,自我和他人对衰老的防御性分离可能是不必要的。本文讨论了理论和方法论方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Aging together-with: The growing older of humans, non-humans and more-than-humans. A commentary Hidden in plain sight: Women and gendered dementia dynamics in the Australian Aged Care Royal Commission Four modes of embodiment in later life “Aging well” in knowledge-intensive service professions in Sweden – The idealization of youth in neoliberal labor markets Social engagement among older women in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1