Microbes and marginalisation: ‘Facing’ antimicrobial resistance in bedridden patients in a peri-urban area of Thailand

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100489
Phakha Whanpuch , Anna Perris , Panoopat Poompruek , Clare I.R. Chandler , Luechai Sri-ngernyuang
{"title":"Microbes and marginalisation: ‘Facing’ antimicrobial resistance in bedridden patients in a peri-urban area of Thailand","authors":"Phakha Whanpuch ,&nbsp;Anna Perris ,&nbsp;Panoopat Poompruek ,&nbsp;Clare I.R. Chandler ,&nbsp;Luechai Sri-ngernyuang","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing human-microbial encounters through improved infection prevention and control (IPC) is widely acknowledged to be critical for reducing the emergence, transmission and burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, despite its centrality in the Global Action Plan (GAP) on AMR and adoption as a goal in National Action Plans around the world, there has been limited progress on reducing the incidence of antimicrobial resistant infections globally. In this paper, we argue that closer attention to different faces of AMR could propel progress in this area, with a focus on bedridden people situated in liminal spaces in the Thai health system and suburban economy. Our ethnographic fieldwork followed the cases of 16 bedridden people through the eyes of their carers and medical staff. We 'descended into the ordinary' to encounter individuals living - and dying - in the shadows of the labour-intensive suburbs of Bangkok. Here, AMR and IPC protocols are operationalised in the context of competing priorities and pragmatic decision-making. Focussing on three ethnographic vignettes, we use the analytic frames of precarity and care to consider how particular (bedridden) bodies are differentially exposed to AMR infections in the context of economic, social, and political arrangements that structure embodied vulnerabilities and forms and foci of care. Whilst the political work of calculating the burden of AMR may be oriented around galvanising support through a sense of magnitude and generalised risk, this research serves as a reminder that the faces of AMR include those who disproportionately shoulder the global burden of AMR, making it at once exceptional and ordinary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing human-microbial encounters through improved infection prevention and control (IPC) is widely acknowledged to be critical for reducing the emergence, transmission and burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, despite its centrality in the Global Action Plan (GAP) on AMR and adoption as a goal in National Action Plans around the world, there has been limited progress on reducing the incidence of antimicrobial resistant infections globally. In this paper, we argue that closer attention to different faces of AMR could propel progress in this area, with a focus on bedridden people situated in liminal spaces in the Thai health system and suburban economy. Our ethnographic fieldwork followed the cases of 16 bedridden people through the eyes of their carers and medical staff. We 'descended into the ordinary' to encounter individuals living - and dying - in the shadows of the labour-intensive suburbs of Bangkok. Here, AMR and IPC protocols are operationalised in the context of competing priorities and pragmatic decision-making. Focussing on three ethnographic vignettes, we use the analytic frames of precarity and care to consider how particular (bedridden) bodies are differentially exposed to AMR infections in the context of economic, social, and political arrangements that structure embodied vulnerabilities and forms and foci of care. Whilst the political work of calculating the burden of AMR may be oriented around galvanising support through a sense of magnitude and generalised risk, this research serves as a reminder that the faces of AMR include those who disproportionately shoulder the global burden of AMR, making it at once exceptional and ordinary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微生物与边缘化:"面对 "泰国城市周边地区卧床病人的抗菌药耐药性
人们普遍认为,通过改善感染预防与控制(IPC)来减少人与微生物的接触,对于减少抗菌药耐药性(AMR)的出现、传播和负担至关重要。然而,尽管它在《全球抗菌药物耐药性行动计划》(GAP)中占据核心地位,并被世界各地的《国家行动计划》采纳为目标,但在降低全球抗菌药物耐药性感染发病率方面进展有限。在本文中,我们将重点关注泰国医疗系统和郊区经济中处于边缘空间的卧床不起者,认为密切关注 AMR 的不同表现形式可以推动该领域的进展。我们的人种学实地调查通过护理人员和医务人员的视角,对 16 名卧床不起者的病例进行了跟踪调查。我们 "深入寻常百姓家",在劳动密集型的曼谷郊区阴暗处与生活和死亡中的人们相遇。在这里,AMR 和 IPC 协议在相互竞争的优先事项和务实决策的背景下得以实施。我们将重点放在三个人种学小故事上,利用不稳定性和护理的分析框架来考虑在经济、社会和政治安排的背景下,特定(卧床不起)的身体是如何不同程度地受到 AMR 感染的,这些安排构建了身体的脆弱性以及护理的形式和重点。虽然计算 AMR 负担的政治工作可能是以通过规模感和普遍风险来激发支持为导向,但这项研究提醒我们,AMR 的面孔包括那些不成比例地承担着全球 AMR 负担的人,使其既特殊又普通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Palestinian physicians on the impact of the Gaza War in the West Bank Prenatal care in urban China: Qualitative study on challenges and coping mechanisms Ableism in mental healthcare settings: A qualitative study among U.S. adults with disabilities A methodological review of solicited diaries as a qualitative tool in health research in low- and middle-income countries Reconciling market and moral logics on a minimum wage: Supermarket work in Australia during the first two years of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1