A risk assessment of a gas pressure reduction station system with confidence for dealing with imprecisions and unknowns

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105437
{"title":"A risk assessment of a gas pressure reduction station system with confidence for dealing with imprecisions and unknowns","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Process systems are sensitive and vital industrial facilities. Disturbances in their performance may cause harm to the environment,humans,or significant economic damage. In risk assessment of chemical process industries, the available data, information, and knowledge are typically rare, limited, and often unrealistic. This issue poses a challenge to conducting a credible quantitative risk assessment and effects the robustness of the results. To address these challenges, this work proposes a methodology based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence as the reasoning framework. It incorporates risk identification, analysis, and mitigation phases to ensure a thorough analysis of risks and the integration of proactive risk reduction strategies. The approach aims to model the worst-case hazard scenario and assess associated risks using various methods such as FMECA, Bow-Tie, Credal Network, and Dempster-Shafer theory. The proposed approach models imprecision and data ambiguity using intervals and associated belief mass. This extension provides a basis for addressing the fundamental problem of prior ignorance about the distribution of the observed data, which is prevalent in data mining applications. A new approach is proposed that utilizes Belief and Plausibility curves, similar to a Cumulative Distribution Function, to propagate uncertainty, enhance criticality discrimination, and determine cumulated belief measures. This approach is applied in analyzing the failure modes identified in FMECA and is further extended through the credal network for comprehensive risk assessment. Results show how to express irrelevant and independent judgments, and how to work out with inferences in credal networks. This issue is often overlooked, but if properly addressed it represents the key to ultimately drawing reliable conclusions and fully utilizing the system's available data. A case study of the City Gate Station system was used to verify the application potential of the proposed approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024001955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Process systems are sensitive and vital industrial facilities. Disturbances in their performance may cause harm to the environment,humans,or significant economic damage. In risk assessment of chemical process industries, the available data, information, and knowledge are typically rare, limited, and often unrealistic. This issue poses a challenge to conducting a credible quantitative risk assessment and effects the robustness of the results. To address these challenges, this work proposes a methodology based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence as the reasoning framework. It incorporates risk identification, analysis, and mitigation phases to ensure a thorough analysis of risks and the integration of proactive risk reduction strategies. The approach aims to model the worst-case hazard scenario and assess associated risks using various methods such as FMECA, Bow-Tie, Credal Network, and Dempster-Shafer theory. The proposed approach models imprecision and data ambiguity using intervals and associated belief mass. This extension provides a basis for addressing the fundamental problem of prior ignorance about the distribution of the observed data, which is prevalent in data mining applications. A new approach is proposed that utilizes Belief and Plausibility curves, similar to a Cumulative Distribution Function, to propagate uncertainty, enhance criticality discrimination, and determine cumulated belief measures. This approach is applied in analyzing the failure modes identified in FMECA and is further extended through the credal network for comprehensive risk assessment. Results show how to express irrelevant and independent judgments, and how to work out with inferences in credal networks. This issue is often overlooked, but if properly addressed it represents the key to ultimately drawing reliable conclusions and fully utilizing the system's available data. A case study of the City Gate Station system was used to verify the application potential of the proposed approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对气体减压站系统进行风险评估,提高处理不精确和未知因素的信心
工艺系统是敏感而重要的工业设施。它们的性能受到干扰可能会对环境、人类造成危害或重大经济损失。在化工流程工业的风险评估中,可用的数据、信息和知识通常是罕见的、有限的,而且往往是不现实的。这一问题对进行可靠的定量风险评估和影响评估结果的稳健性构成了挑战。为了应对这些挑战,这项工作提出了一种以 Dempster-Shafer 证据理论为推理框架的方法。该方法包含风险识别、分析和缓解阶段,以确保对风险进行全面分析,并整合积极主动的风险降低策略。该方法旨在利用 FMECA、Bow-Tie、Credal Network 和 Dempster-Shafer 理论等各种方法,模拟最坏情况下的危险情景并评估相关风险。建议的方法使用区间和相关的信念质量对不精确性和数据模糊性进行建模。这一扩展为解决数据挖掘应用中普遍存在的对观测数据分布的先验无知这一基本问题提供了基础。我们提出了一种新方法,利用类似于累积分布函数的信念和可信度曲线来传播不确定性,增强临界判别能力,并确定累积信念量。这种方法适用于分析 FMECA 中确定的故障模式,并通过信用网络进一步扩展,以进行综合风险评估。结果表明了如何表达不相关和独立的判断,以及如何在信誉网络中进行推论。这个问题经常被忽视,但如果处理得当,它将成为最终得出可靠结论和充分利用系统可用数据的关键。我们利用城门站系统的案例研究来验证所建议方法的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
Research on the diffusion and control of unsafe behaviors among chemical industry park enterprises based on the SEIR evolutionary game model Experimental study on hydrogen pipeline leakage: Negative pressure wave characteristics and inline detection method A dynamic system reliability analysis model on safety instrumented systems Effect of ambient pressure on the fire characteristics of lithium-ion battery energy storage container Incident investigation of hydrogen explosion and fire in a residue desulfurization process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1