Development and validation of the North American COmfort of hearing PROtection Device questionnaire (COPROD-NAQ)

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106688
Alessia Negrini , Chantal Gauvin , Djamal Berbiche , Jonathan Terroir , Nellie Perrin , Caroline Jolly , Laurence Martin , Franck Sgard , Olivier Doutres
{"title":"Development and validation of the North American COmfort of hearing PROtection Device questionnaire (COPROD-NAQ)","authors":"Alessia Negrini ,&nbsp;Chantal Gauvin ,&nbsp;Djamal Berbiche ,&nbsp;Jonathan Terroir ,&nbsp;Nellie Perrin ,&nbsp;Caroline Jolly ,&nbsp;Laurence Martin ,&nbsp;Franck Sgard ,&nbsp;Olivier Doutres","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of hearing protection devices (HPDs), such as earplugs, is essential for mitigating occupational noise-induced hearing loss. However, earplug discomfort often hinders consistent and proper usage. This international and multidisciplinary study is based on a comfort model of HPD use, and considers four comfort dimensions (physical, functional, acoustical, psychological) and the influence of the triad environment/person/earplugs” components on overall comfort. Addressing shortcomings in defining and measuring comfort, the study aims to enrich understanding of the multifaceted aspects of earplug (dis)comfort and the role played by the triad. Specific objectives include developing and validating the “North American COmfort of Hearing PROtection Device Questionnaire (COPROD-NAQ),” proposing a latent overall comfort (LOC) model and comparing earplug families regarding (dis)comfort dimensions. Longitudinal data were collected over a 7-week from 173 workers testing 998 pairs of earplugs in three Canadian manufacturing companies. Factor analyses identified 51 items across 11 conceptual sub-dimensions with satisfactory reliability coefficients. Statistical analyses confirmed the COPROD-NAQ’s validity as well. All its sub-dimensions significantly contributed to the LOC, with psychological and functional comfort exerting greater influence. Certain triad component characteristics (e.g., working during weekdays with a day shift, being right-handed, Custom 1 earplug model) enhanced the LOC. Finally, custom earplugs were perceived as most comfortable. The COPROD-NAQ emerges as a powerful tool for assessing earplug comfort and its interaction with triad characteristics, beneficial for occupational health and safety stakeholders. It will aid in prevention programs and help manufacturers design more comfortable earplugs to prevent hearing impairment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106688"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524002789","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of hearing protection devices (HPDs), such as earplugs, is essential for mitigating occupational noise-induced hearing loss. However, earplug discomfort often hinders consistent and proper usage. This international and multidisciplinary study is based on a comfort model of HPD use, and considers four comfort dimensions (physical, functional, acoustical, psychological) and the influence of the triad environment/person/earplugs” components on overall comfort. Addressing shortcomings in defining and measuring comfort, the study aims to enrich understanding of the multifaceted aspects of earplug (dis)comfort and the role played by the triad. Specific objectives include developing and validating the “North American COmfort of Hearing PROtection Device Questionnaire (COPROD-NAQ),” proposing a latent overall comfort (LOC) model and comparing earplug families regarding (dis)comfort dimensions. Longitudinal data were collected over a 7-week from 173 workers testing 998 pairs of earplugs in three Canadian manufacturing companies. Factor analyses identified 51 items across 11 conceptual sub-dimensions with satisfactory reliability coefficients. Statistical analyses confirmed the COPROD-NAQ’s validity as well. All its sub-dimensions significantly contributed to the LOC, with psychological and functional comfort exerting greater influence. Certain triad component characteristics (e.g., working during weekdays with a day shift, being right-handed, Custom 1 earplug model) enhanced the LOC. Finally, custom earplugs were perceived as most comfortable. The COPROD-NAQ emerges as a powerful tool for assessing earplug comfort and its interaction with triad characteristics, beneficial for occupational health and safety stakeholders. It will aid in prevention programs and help manufacturers design more comfortable earplugs to prevent hearing impairment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北美听力保护装置舒适度问卷(COPROD-NAQ)的开发与验证
使用耳塞等听力保护装置(HPD)对于减轻职业噪声引起的听力损失至关重要。然而,耳塞的不适感往往会妨碍人们坚持正确使用耳塞。这项国际性多学科研究基于人机共振耳塞使用舒适度模型,考虑了四个舒适度维度(物理、功能、声学、心理)以及 "环境/人/耳塞 "三要素对整体舒适度的影响。针对舒适度定义和测量方面的不足,该研究旨在丰富对耳塞(不)舒适度多方面问题以及三要素所起作用的理解。具体目标包括开发和验证 "北美听力保护设备舒适度问卷(COPROD-NAQ)",提出一个潜在的整体舒适度(LOC)模型,并比较耳塞家族的(不)舒适度维度。我们收集了加拿大三家制造公司 173 名工人为期 7 周、测试 998 对耳塞的纵向数据。因子分析确定了 11 个概念子维度的 51 个项目,可靠性系数令人满意。统计分析也证实了 COPROD-NAQ 的有效性。所有子维度都对 LOC 有重大影响,其中心理和功能舒适度的影响更大。某些三要素特征(如工作日白班工作、惯用右手、定制 1 型耳塞)增强了 LOC。最后,定制耳塞被认为是最舒适的。COPROD-NAQ 是评估耳塞舒适度及其与三要素相互作用的有力工具,对职业健康和安全利益相关者大有裨益。它将有助于开展预防计划,并帮助制造商设计出更舒适的耳塞来预防听力损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A systematic review of hazard recognition and risk perception research in the construction industry Investigating the predictive validity of subjective and objective measures for general aviation pilots’ risk propensity Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: A systematic literature review Exploring the role of safety culture dimensions in patient safety using a Bayesian Belief Network model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1