{"title":"Flow data forecasting for the junction flow using artificial neural network","authors":"Besir Sahin , Cetin Canpolat , Mehmet Bilgili","doi":"10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2024.102703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study aims to predict the flow characteristics downstream of a cylinder, which is the result of junction flow using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm. The training and test datasets were obtained through Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experiments. The experiments were conducted at Reynolds numbers Re = 1.5 x 10<sup>3</sup> and 4 x 10<sup>3</sup> based on the cylinder diameter (D) at dimensionless measurement heights (Z = h/D) of Z<sub>1</sub> = 0.06, Z<sub>2</sub> = 0.4, Z<sub>3</sub> = 0.8, and Z<sub>4</sub> = 1.6 respectively. While the X- and Y-coordinate and dimensionless measurement location (Z) variables are employed as inputs to the ANN model, the output variables are vorticity ⟨ω⟩, streamwise velocity ⟨u⟩, and transverse velocity ⟨v⟩, which are derived from the time-averaged flow data. Modeling flow characteristics with easily obtainable independent variables without flow and physical properties was considered. Three various training algorithms such as Levenberg Marquardt (LM), Resilient Backpropagation (RP), and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) were employed to assess and compare their prediction performance. The results indicate that the LM learning algorithm outperforms the RP and SCG algorithms, especially at low Reynolds (Re) numbers. The ANN model, trained with the LM algorithm, exhibits significant success, achieving R = 0.9816 correlation coefficient (R), MAE = 2.4250 m/s Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and RMSE = 3.3541 m/s Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for streamwise velocity ⟨u⟩ data. Notably, the LM algorithm for the testing process demonstrates the best predictions at Re = 1.5x10<sup>3</sup>, yielding R = 0.9779, MAE = 2.7417 m/s, and RMSE = 3.7493 m/s. The ANN-LM model's patterns closely align with experimental results, affirming its accuracy, which proves that the prediction of time-averaged velocity data solely based on spatial coordinates as input can be achieved successfully.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50440,"journal":{"name":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 102703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598624001833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study aims to predict the flow characteristics downstream of a cylinder, which is the result of junction flow using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm. The training and test datasets were obtained through Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experiments. The experiments were conducted at Reynolds numbers Re = 1.5 x 103 and 4 x 103 based on the cylinder diameter (D) at dimensionless measurement heights (Z = h/D) of Z1 = 0.06, Z2 = 0.4, Z3 = 0.8, and Z4 = 1.6 respectively. While the X- and Y-coordinate and dimensionless measurement location (Z) variables are employed as inputs to the ANN model, the output variables are vorticity ⟨ω⟩, streamwise velocity ⟨u⟩, and transverse velocity ⟨v⟩, which are derived from the time-averaged flow data. Modeling flow characteristics with easily obtainable independent variables without flow and physical properties was considered. Three various training algorithms such as Levenberg Marquardt (LM), Resilient Backpropagation (RP), and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) were employed to assess and compare their prediction performance. The results indicate that the LM learning algorithm outperforms the RP and SCG algorithms, especially at low Reynolds (Re) numbers. The ANN model, trained with the LM algorithm, exhibits significant success, achieving R = 0.9816 correlation coefficient (R), MAE = 2.4250 m/s Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and RMSE = 3.3541 m/s Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for streamwise velocity ⟨u⟩ data. Notably, the LM algorithm for the testing process demonstrates the best predictions at Re = 1.5x103, yielding R = 0.9779, MAE = 2.7417 m/s, and RMSE = 3.7493 m/s. The ANN-LM model's patterns closely align with experimental results, affirming its accuracy, which proves that the prediction of time-averaged velocity data solely based on spatial coordinates as input can be achieved successfully.
期刊介绍:
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation is dedicated to disseminating the latest research results on all aspects of flow measurement, in both closed conduits and open channels. The design of flow measurement systems involves a wide variety of multidisciplinary activities including modelling the flow sensor, the fluid flow and the sensor/fluid interactions through the use of computation techniques; the development of advanced transducer systems and their associated signal processing and the laboratory and field assessment of the overall system under ideal and disturbed conditions.
FMI is the essential forum for critical information exchange, and contributions are particularly encouraged in the following areas of interest:
Modelling: the application of mathematical and computational modelling to the interaction of fluid dynamics with flowmeters, including flowmeter behaviour, improved flowmeter design and installation problems. Application of CAD/CAE techniques to flowmeter modelling are eligible.
Design and development: the detailed design of the flowmeter head and/or signal processing aspects of novel flowmeters. Emphasis is given to papers identifying new sensor configurations, multisensor flow measurement systems, non-intrusive flow metering techniques and the application of microelectronic techniques in smart or intelligent systems.
Calibration techniques: including descriptions of new or existing calibration facilities and techniques, calibration data from different flowmeter types, and calibration intercomparison data from different laboratories.
Installation effect data: dealing with the effects of non-ideal flow conditions on flowmeters. Papers combining a theoretical understanding of flowmeter behaviour with experimental work are particularly welcome.