R&D project subsidy V.S. government innovation reward: The effectiveness on corporate innovation

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102288
Yafei Li , Xiaoqi Dong , Jinping Sun
{"title":"R&D project subsidy V.S. government innovation reward: The effectiveness on corporate innovation","authors":"Yafei Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoqi Dong ,&nbsp;Jinping Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper compares the effectiveness of R&amp;D project subsidies and government innovation rewards. Using a dataset of China's listed companies from 2008 to 2019, we investigate the associations of these two innovation grants with corporate innovation. The results indicate that both R&amp;D project subsidy and government innovation reward can increase corporate innovation output. However, only government innovation reward can encourage private R&amp;D investment. In addition, R&amp;D project subsidy serves as an incentive role through the governance and financing mechanisms, whereas the government innovation reward has only a governance mechanism. Furthermore, the R&amp;D project subsidy has a relatively poor impact on large firms and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), whereas the government innovation reward can still motivate their innovation. This study contributes to the expanding body of literature by providing diverse evidence of innovation grants from the perspective of the government subsidizing stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 102288"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001779","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper compares the effectiveness of R&D project subsidies and government innovation rewards. Using a dataset of China's listed companies from 2008 to 2019, we investigate the associations of these two innovation grants with corporate innovation. The results indicate that both R&D project subsidy and government innovation reward can increase corporate innovation output. However, only government innovation reward can encourage private R&D investment. In addition, R&D project subsidy serves as an incentive role through the governance and financing mechanisms, whereas the government innovation reward has only a governance mechanism. Furthermore, the R&D project subsidy has a relatively poor impact on large firms and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), whereas the government innovation reward can still motivate their innovation. This study contributes to the expanding body of literature by providing diverse evidence of innovation grants from the perspective of the government subsidizing stage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研发项目补贴与美国政府创新奖励:对企业创新的影响
本文比较了研发项目补贴和政府创新奖励的效果。利用 2008 年至 2019 年的中国上市公司数据集,我们研究了这两种创新补助与企业创新的关联。结果表明,研发项目补助和政府创新奖励都能提高企业的创新产出。然而,只有政府创新奖励才能鼓励私人研发投资。此外,研发项目补贴通过治理机制和融资机制发挥激励作用,而政府创新奖励只有治理机制。此外,研发项目补贴对大型企业和国有企业的影响相对较小,而政府创新奖励仍能激励其创新。本研究从政府补贴阶段的角度提供了创新补助的各种证据,为不断扩展的文献体系做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
Quenching thirst, easing debt: Improvement in water resource endowment alleviates local government debt risk Infrastructure and the patterns of trade: An empirical look at China Cognitive ability in matching with strategic uncertainty: An experimental study Follow the gaze: How social attention shapes gendered trading choices Did the anti-avoidance rules curtail the profit shifting of foreign multinationals in China?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1