Revisiting the connection between progressive aspect and motion event cognition: Evidence from L1 Mandarin Chinese and L2 Swedish

IF 1.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Lingua Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103827
Qiu-Jun Zhang
{"title":"Revisiting the connection between progressive aspect and motion event cognition: Evidence from L1 Mandarin Chinese and L2 Swedish","authors":"Qiu-Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether grammatical aspect influences the extent to which speakers attend to the endpoint (Goal) of motion events. Taking a typological perspective, the study examines the use of progressive markers in Mandarin Chinese through a progressive questionnaire. After identifying Mandarin’s aspectual features, the study re-examines the relationship between progressive aspect and endpoint preferences by analyzing motion event descriptions made by native Mandarin speakers and comparing their performance with L1 Mandarin learners of L2 Swedish in a memory-based triad-matching task. The results of these comparisons reveal that Mandarin speakers mentioned the endpoint of an event as frequently as [+aspect] English speakers but significantly less frequently than [-aspect] Swedish and Afrikaans speakers, thereby indicating an ‘endpoint preference’ for Swedish and Afrikaans speakers. In a non-linguistic similarity judgment task, no significant differences were observed between the L1 and L2 groups in their frequency of pairing the target clip with the endpoint-highlighted alternative clip. However, a positive correlation between the participants’ length of stay in Sweden and endpoint preferences was identified, implying a cognitive shift from ‘progress salience’ in [+aspect] L1 to ‘endpoint salience’ in [-aspect] L2. This suggests that immersion in an L2 context influences language acquisition and cognitive restructuring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 103827"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002438412400158X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates whether grammatical aspect influences the extent to which speakers attend to the endpoint (Goal) of motion events. Taking a typological perspective, the study examines the use of progressive markers in Mandarin Chinese through a progressive questionnaire. After identifying Mandarin’s aspectual features, the study re-examines the relationship between progressive aspect and endpoint preferences by analyzing motion event descriptions made by native Mandarin speakers and comparing their performance with L1 Mandarin learners of L2 Swedish in a memory-based triad-matching task. The results of these comparisons reveal that Mandarin speakers mentioned the endpoint of an event as frequently as [+aspect] English speakers but significantly less frequently than [-aspect] Swedish and Afrikaans speakers, thereby indicating an ‘endpoint preference’ for Swedish and Afrikaans speakers. In a non-linguistic similarity judgment task, no significant differences were observed between the L1 and L2 groups in their frequency of pairing the target clip with the endpoint-highlighted alternative clip. However, a positive correlation between the participants’ length of stay in Sweden and endpoint preferences was identified, implying a cognitive shift from ‘progress salience’ in [+aspect] L1 to ‘endpoint salience’ in [-aspect] L2. This suggests that immersion in an L2 context influences language acquisition and cognitive restructuring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视进行时方面与运动事件认知之间的联系:来自第一语言普通话和第二语言瑞典语的证据
本研究探讨了语法方面是否会影响说话人对运动事件的终点(目标)的关注程度。本研究从类型学的角度出发,通过递进式问卷调查来考察普通话中递进标记的使用情况。在确定普通话的方面特征后,研究通过分析母语为普通话的人所做的运动事件描述,并在基于记忆的三元组匹配任务中将他们的表现与学习第二语言瑞典语的第一语言普通话学习者的表现进行比较,重新审视了递进方面和终点偏好之间的关系。比较结果显示,说普通话的人提到事件终点的频率与说[+aspect]英语的人一样高,但明显低于说[-aspect]瑞典语和南非荷兰语的人,这表明说瑞典语和南非荷兰语的人有 "终点偏好"。在非语言相似性判断任务中,L1 和 L2 组在将目标片段与突出终点的备选片段配对的频率上没有发现明显差异。然而,研究发现,受试者在瑞典逗留的时间长短与终点偏好之间存在正相关,这意味着认知从[+方面]L1的 "进展突出 "转变为[-方面]L2的 "终点突出"。这表明,在 L2 环境中的沉浸会影响语言习得和认知重组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lingua
Lingua Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.
期刊最新文献
Sentence processing in Turkish: A review and future directions First acquiring articles in a second language: A new approach to the study of language and social cognition Interpreter mediation as other-initiated self-repair in court: Effects on the defence in Chinese bilingual criminal trials The merger of falling tones: A perception study in Taiyuan Jin Chinese Visual priming and parsing preferences: A self-paced reading study of PP-attachment ambiguity in Dutch verb-final structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1