O-arm navigation without apnoea in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine surgery: Outcomes and considerations in a prospective study

Shailesh Hadgaonkar , Divya Tomer , Bharati Adhye , Ashok Shyam , Parag Sancheti
{"title":"O-arm navigation without apnoea in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine surgery: Outcomes and considerations in a prospective study","authors":"Shailesh Hadgaonkar ,&nbsp;Divya Tomer ,&nbsp;Bharati Adhye ,&nbsp;Ashok Shyam ,&nbsp;Parag Sancheti","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intra operative three dimensional navigation-assisted pedicle screw insertion typically requires apnoea for reliable image production. However this carries potential risks to the physiologically compromised patients such as patients having COPD, obesity, cardiac illnesses, and anaemia. In such patients’ safe apnoea time may be as low as 1 min, and can cause life threatening complications. Therefore, this study was done to evaluate the accuracy of thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screw insertion using O-arm without using apnoea during imaging, to prevent such possible complications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single centre prospective study of 238 patients treated with pedicle screw implantation under O-arm guidance, without using apnoea while imaging. The pedicle breach rate during screw insertion was graded on Gertzbein classification. Also, two senior spine surgeons independently evaluated motion artifacts in the intra operative images and rated them as ‘Significant’ or ‘Non-Significant’ for the procedure. Values of p &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant<strong>.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Despite not using apnoea in 238 patients with 1120 screws, there were nil screw related complications. Only in one paediatric case of dorsal spine deformity, there were blurred and inaccurate images because of chest expansion, without apnoea. Hence he was given apnoea to render the image reliable for pedicle screw insertion. The screw placement in the pedicles was checked intraoperatively and graded for breach. Grade 2 breach were seen in only 2 cases (n = 3 screws) which were revised intra operatively. The interobserver agreement on motion artifacts was good (κ = 0.565, p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of pedicular screw insertion performed without induced apnea are comparable to those achieved with apnea when using O-arm imaging. This technique has proven to be a safe and reliable method for pedicle screw insertion in the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine, potentially mitigating physiological complications. Nonetheless, even minor motion artifacts, on the order of a few millimeters, can significantly impact outcomes in the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Therefore, further research is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this approach in these regions of the spine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 102551"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566224002200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intra operative three dimensional navigation-assisted pedicle screw insertion typically requires apnoea for reliable image production. However this carries potential risks to the physiologically compromised patients such as patients having COPD, obesity, cardiac illnesses, and anaemia. In such patients’ safe apnoea time may be as low as 1 min, and can cause life threatening complications. Therefore, this study was done to evaluate the accuracy of thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screw insertion using O-arm without using apnoea during imaging, to prevent such possible complications.

Methods

This is a single centre prospective study of 238 patients treated with pedicle screw implantation under O-arm guidance, without using apnoea while imaging. The pedicle breach rate during screw insertion was graded on Gertzbein classification. Also, two senior spine surgeons independently evaluated motion artifacts in the intra operative images and rated them as ‘Significant’ or ‘Non-Significant’ for the procedure. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Despite not using apnoea in 238 patients with 1120 screws, there were nil screw related complications. Only in one paediatric case of dorsal spine deformity, there were blurred and inaccurate images because of chest expansion, without apnoea. Hence he was given apnoea to render the image reliable for pedicle screw insertion. The screw placement in the pedicles was checked intraoperatively and graded for breach. Grade 2 breach were seen in only 2 cases (n = 3 screws) which were revised intra operatively. The interobserver agreement on motion artifacts was good (κ = 0.565, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results of pedicular screw insertion performed without induced apnea are comparable to those achieved with apnea when using O-arm imaging. This technique has proven to be a safe and reliable method for pedicle screw insertion in the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine, potentially mitigating physiological complications. Nonetheless, even minor motion artifacts, on the order of a few millimeters, can significantly impact outcomes in the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Therefore, further research is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this approach in these regions of the spine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腰椎和腰椎手术中无呼吸暂停的 O 型臂导航:一项前瞻性研究的结果和注意事项
背景术中三维导航辅助椎弓根螺钉植入术通常需要呼吸暂停以生成可靠的图像。然而,这对患有慢性阻塞性肺病、肥胖症、心脏病和贫血症等生理功能受损的患者来说具有潜在风险。这类患者的安全呼吸暂停时间可能低至 1 分钟,并可能导致危及生命的并发症。因此,本研究旨在评估在成像过程中不使用呼吸暂停的情况下使用 O 型臂插入胸腰椎和腰椎椎弓根螺钉的准确性,以防止此类可能出现的并发症。方法这是一项单中心前瞻性研究,238 名患者在 O 型臂引导下接受了椎弓根螺钉植入治疗,成像过程中未使用呼吸暂停。椎弓根螺钉植入过程中的椎弓根破损率按 Gertzbein 分级。此外,两名资深脊柱外科医生对术中图像中的运动伪影进行了独立评估,并将其评为 "显著 "或 "非显著"。结果尽管 238 名患者共使用了 1120 颗螺钉,但没有出现与螺钉相关的并发症。只有一例脊柱背侧畸形的儿科病例,在未进行呼吸暂停的情况下,由于胸廓扩张而导致图像模糊和不准确。因此,对他进行了呼吸暂停治疗,以便在插入椎弓根螺钉时获得可靠的图像。术中检查了螺钉在椎弓根内的放置情况,并对破损情况进行了分级。只有两例病例(n = 3枚螺钉)出现了2级破损,并在术中进行了修补。运动伪影方面的观察者间一致性良好(κ = 0.565,p < 0.001)。结论使用O型臂成像时,在不诱导呼吸暂停的情况下进行的椎弓根螺钉植入术与使用呼吸暂停的结果相当。该技术已被证明是胸腰椎和腰椎椎弓根螺钉插入的一种安全可靠的方法,可减轻生理并发症。然而,即使是几毫米的微小运动伪影,也会对颈椎和上胸椎的治疗效果产生重大影响。因此,有必要进一步研究评估这种方法在这些脊柱区域的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
期刊最新文献
Biologic Augmented Scaffold-based cartilage repair: Addressing Complications and Enhancing Outcomes. Managing the arthritic wrist: Complication prevention and management. Challenges and complications in arthroscopic ankle ligament repair: Current concepts. AI in scientific publishing: Revolutionizing research with caution. Letter to editor: Sathyendra et al. Comparative study of local injections of autologous platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid in management of chronic plantar fasciitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1