{"title":"A framework for joint vehicle localization and road mapping using onboard sensors","authors":"Karl Berntorp, Marcus Greiff","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a modeling framework for joint estimation of a host vehicle state and a map of the road based on global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and camera measurements. We model the road using a spline representation based on lower-dimensional Bézier curves parametrized in <em>generalized endpoints</em> (GEPs) with implicit guarantees of continuous lane boundaries. We model the GEPs by a parameter vector having a Gaussian prior representing the uncertainty of the prior map, and provide a systematic way of defining this prior from generic map representations. Both GNSS and camera measurements, such as lane-mark measurements, have noise characteristics that vary in time. To adapt to the changing noise levels and hence improve positioning performance, we formulate the problem as a joint vehicle state, map parameter, and noise covariance estimation problem and present two noise-adaptive linear-regression Kalman filters (LRKFs); (i) an interacting multiple-model (IMM) LRKF and (ii) a variational-Bayes (VB) LRKF. We conduct a Monte-Carlo study and compare the two approaches in terms of estimation precision and computation times. Embedded implementations in an automotive-grade dSpace Micro Autobox-II indicate the real-time validity of both approaches, with turn-around times of between 2–<span><math><mrow><mn>80</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>ms</mi></mrow></math></span>, depending on the problem size and if the map is updated. The results indicate that while the IMM-LRKF shows marginally better estimation accuracy, the VB-LRKF is at least a factor of 2 faster.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 106112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066124002715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents a modeling framework for joint estimation of a host vehicle state and a map of the road based on global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and camera measurements. We model the road using a spline representation based on lower-dimensional Bézier curves parametrized in generalized endpoints (GEPs) with implicit guarantees of continuous lane boundaries. We model the GEPs by a parameter vector having a Gaussian prior representing the uncertainty of the prior map, and provide a systematic way of defining this prior from generic map representations. Both GNSS and camera measurements, such as lane-mark measurements, have noise characteristics that vary in time. To adapt to the changing noise levels and hence improve positioning performance, we formulate the problem as a joint vehicle state, map parameter, and noise covariance estimation problem and present two noise-adaptive linear-regression Kalman filters (LRKFs); (i) an interacting multiple-model (IMM) LRKF and (ii) a variational-Bayes (VB) LRKF. We conduct a Monte-Carlo study and compare the two approaches in terms of estimation precision and computation times. Embedded implementations in an automotive-grade dSpace Micro Autobox-II indicate the real-time validity of both approaches, with turn-around times of between 2–, depending on the problem size and if the map is updated. The results indicate that while the IMM-LRKF shows marginally better estimation accuracy, the VB-LRKF is at least a factor of 2 faster.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.