Interoperability between structural and geotechnical analysis for the study of safety in existing bridges

Adalgisa Zirpoli , Paolo Sattamino
{"title":"Interoperability between structural and geotechnical analysis for the study of safety in existing bridges","authors":"Adalgisa Zirpoli ,&nbsp;Paolo Sattamino","doi":"10.1016/j.prostr.2024.09.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, the engineering community has shown a significant increase in interest in the field of soil-structure interaction. This problem is undoubtedly one of the most complex. Despite the exponential increase in computer performance in the last two decades, followed by the continuous development of numerical methods, the interaction between structural analysis programs and geotechnical issues remains limited. Specialized calculation codes for structural engineering and geotechnical engineering often operate independently. The reason for this separation lies in the highly specialized capabilities that a solver designed for geotechnical issues must possess. However, it remains crucial to incorporate the structural element within its geotechnical context, especially in the case of structures that are fully or partially embedded in the ground, such as tunnels, retaining walls, bridge abutments, and so on. There exists a mutual and reciprocal influence of the stress-strain state: the stiffness (and strength) of the foundation determines the response of the structure, which in turn affects the response of the foundation through its own stiffness. In many projects, there is an increasing demand to develop analyses that harness the full potential of both the structural and geotechnical aspects. Hence, there is a clear need to establish a connection between these two computational environments. The proposed solution involves the interaction of two programs: Midas Civil, an essential tool for structural engineers, and Flac 3D, a general-purpose software for geotechnical engineering. As explained further, this interaction is made possible thanks to the flexibility and openness of both software codes. Referring to a real case study of a road bridge with a superstructure consisting of reinforced concrete beams, this paper will illustrate the main challenges, significant steps, and undeniable advantages obtained through this approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20518,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Structural Integrity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321624006553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the engineering community has shown a significant increase in interest in the field of soil-structure interaction. This problem is undoubtedly one of the most complex. Despite the exponential increase in computer performance in the last two decades, followed by the continuous development of numerical methods, the interaction between structural analysis programs and geotechnical issues remains limited. Specialized calculation codes for structural engineering and geotechnical engineering often operate independently. The reason for this separation lies in the highly specialized capabilities that a solver designed for geotechnical issues must possess. However, it remains crucial to incorporate the structural element within its geotechnical context, especially in the case of structures that are fully or partially embedded in the ground, such as tunnels, retaining walls, bridge abutments, and so on. There exists a mutual and reciprocal influence of the stress-strain state: the stiffness (and strength) of the foundation determines the response of the structure, which in turn affects the response of the foundation through its own stiffness. In many projects, there is an increasing demand to develop analyses that harness the full potential of both the structural and geotechnical aspects. Hence, there is a clear need to establish a connection between these two computational environments. The proposed solution involves the interaction of two programs: Midas Civil, an essential tool for structural engineers, and Flac 3D, a general-purpose software for geotechnical engineering. As explained further, this interaction is made possible thanks to the flexibility and openness of both software codes. Referring to a real case study of a road bridge with a superstructure consisting of reinforced concrete beams, this paper will illustrate the main challenges, significant steps, and undeniable advantages obtained through this approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构分析和岩土分析在研究现有桥梁安全方面的互操作性
近年来,工程界对土体与结构相互作用领域的兴趣大增。这个问题无疑是最复杂的问题之一。尽管在过去二十年中计算机性能呈指数级增长,数值方法也随之不断发展,但结构分析程序与岩土工程问题之间的互动仍然有限。结构工程和岩土工程的专业计算代码通常是独立运行的。这种分离的原因在于为岩土工程问题设计的求解器必须具备高度专业化的能力。然而,将结构元素纳入岩土工程范畴仍然至关重要,尤其是对于完全或部分嵌入地下的结构,如隧道、挡土墙、桥台等。应力-应变状态存在着相互和相互影响:地基的刚度(和强度)决定了结构的响应,而结构的响应又反过来通过地基自身的刚度影响地基的响应。在许多项目中,人们越来越需要开发出能够充分利用结构和岩土两方面潜力的分析方法。因此,显然需要在这两个计算环境之间建立联系。建议的解决方案涉及两个程序的交互:Midas Civil 是结构工程师的必备工具,而 Flac 3D 则是岩土工程的通用软件。正如进一步解释的那样,由于这两个软件代码的灵活性和开放性,这种互动成为可能。本文将通过对一座由钢筋混凝土梁组成的上部结构公路桥的实际案例研究,说明这种方法所面临的主要挑战、重要步骤以及无可否认的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Editorial Preface Editorial Strain measurement consistency of distributed fiber optic sensors for monitoring composite structures under various loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1