Displacement prediction of landslides at slope-scale: Review of physics-based and data-driven approaches

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth-Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104948
Wenping Gong , Shaoyan Zhang , C. Hsein Juang , Huiming Tang , Shiva P. Pudasaini
{"title":"Displacement prediction of landslides at slope-scale: Review of physics-based and data-driven approaches","authors":"Wenping Gong ,&nbsp;Shaoyan Zhang ,&nbsp;C. Hsein Juang ,&nbsp;Huiming Tang ,&nbsp;Shiva P. Pudasaini","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, a critical review of the landslide displacement prediction is conducted, based on a database of 359 articles on landslide displacement prediction published from 1985 to 2023. The statistical analysis of this database shows that the methods taken for the landslide displacement prediction could be categorized into physics-based and data-driven approaches. In the context of the physics-based approaches, the displacement of a landslide is characterized and predicted by a physics-based model that approximates the deformation mechanism of the landslide; whereas, the displacement, in the data-driven approaches, is often characterized and predicted by a mathematical or machine learning model, established based on analyses of the historical data. Note that although physics-based approaches were generally adopted in the early studies, data-driven approaches are becoming more and more popular in recent years. The main components involved in the physics-based approaches, including principles for establishing the prediction model, determination of model parameters, solution strategies of the model built, evaluation of the model's predictive performance, are first reviewed based on the literature database; then, those of the data-driven approaches, including methods for pre-processing the landslide displacement and influencing factors, algorithms for establishing the prediction model, calibration of model parameters, probabilistic prediction methods of landslide displacement, and evaluation of the model's predictive performance, are analyzed. Based on analyses of the information collected from the literature and our experience, we further discuss the challenges faced in landslide displacement prediction and offer recommendations for future research. We suggest that a hybrid prediction framework that takes advantage of both physics-based and data-driven approaches, a multi-field and multi-parameter landslide monitoring scheme, and an efficient strategy for the calibration of model parameters warrant further investigations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 104948"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224002769","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, a critical review of the landslide displacement prediction is conducted, based on a database of 359 articles on landslide displacement prediction published from 1985 to 2023. The statistical analysis of this database shows that the methods taken for the landslide displacement prediction could be categorized into physics-based and data-driven approaches. In the context of the physics-based approaches, the displacement of a landslide is characterized and predicted by a physics-based model that approximates the deformation mechanism of the landslide; whereas, the displacement, in the data-driven approaches, is often characterized and predicted by a mathematical or machine learning model, established based on analyses of the historical data. Note that although physics-based approaches were generally adopted in the early studies, data-driven approaches are becoming more and more popular in recent years. The main components involved in the physics-based approaches, including principles for establishing the prediction model, determination of model parameters, solution strategies of the model built, evaluation of the model's predictive performance, are first reviewed based on the literature database; then, those of the data-driven approaches, including methods for pre-processing the landslide displacement and influencing factors, algorithms for establishing the prediction model, calibration of model parameters, probabilistic prediction methods of landslide displacement, and evaluation of the model's predictive performance, are analyzed. Based on analyses of the information collected from the literature and our experience, we further discuss the challenges faced in landslide displacement prediction and offer recommendations for future research. We suggest that a hybrid prediction framework that takes advantage of both physics-based and data-driven approaches, a multi-field and multi-parameter landslide monitoring scheme, and an efficient strategy for the calibration of model parameters warrant further investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斜坡尺度的滑坡位移预测:基于物理学和数据驱动的方法综述
本文基于 1985 年至 2023 年间发表的 359 篇有关滑坡位移预测的文章数据库,对滑坡位移预测进行了深入研究。通过对数据库的统计分析发现,滑坡位移预测的方法可分为基于物理的方法和数据驱动的方法。在基于物理的方法中,滑坡的位移是由一个物理模型来描述和预测的,该模型近似于滑坡的变形机制;而在数据驱动的方法中,位移通常是由一个数学或机器学习模型来描述和预测的,该模型是基于对历史数据的分析而建立的。需要注意的是,虽然早期研究普遍采用基于物理的方法,但近年来数据驱动方法越来越流行。首先,根据文献数据库,对基于物理的方法所涉及的主要内容,包括建立预测模型的原则、模型参数的确定、所建模型的求解策略、模型预测性能的评估等进行了综述;然后,对数据驱动的方法所涉及的主要内容,包括滑坡位移和影响因素的预处理方法、建立预测模型的算法、模型参数的校核、滑坡位移的概率预测方法、模型预测性能的评估等进行了分析。在分析文献信息和经验的基础上,我们进一步讨论了滑坡位移预测所面临的挑战,并对未来研究提出了建议。我们认为,利用基于物理和数据驱动方法的混合预测框架、多现场和多参数滑坡监测方案以及校准模型参数的有效策略值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Metallogeny of Late Paleozoic lode gold mineralization of western Tien Shan: From orogenic shortening to intracontinental strike-slip shearing Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Qaidam block, northern Tibet: Implications for the assembly and breakup of Proterozoic supercontinents Fate of ‘forever chemicals’ in the global cryosphere Incorporating cross-scale insights into colloid-facilitated radionuclide transport in fractured rocks: A critical review Biostabilization: Parameterizing the interactions between microorganisms and siliciclastic marine sediments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1