Rubén Torres Agustín , Zareth Bonilla González , Mario A. Rodríguez Camacho , Sebastián Almonte , Wendy Fabiola Lara Galindo , Francisco Abelardo Robles Aguirre
{"title":"Detection of semantic inconsistencies of motor actions: From language to praxis","authors":"Rubén Torres Agustín , Zareth Bonilla González , Mario A. Rodríguez Camacho , Sebastián Almonte , Wendy Fabiola Lara Galindo , Francisco Abelardo Robles Aguirre","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Semantics of actions includes three types of knowledge: a) of the function of objects and tools, b) of the actions independently of the tools, and c) of the organization of simple actions in sequences. These types of knowledge might be structured as thematic roles into the semantics of actions. To test these hypothesis, 125 illustrations, divided into five conditions: i) Congruent (C), ii) Agent Inconsistent (AI), iii) Instrument Inconsistent (II), iv) Patient Inconsistent (PI), and v) Location Inconsistent (LI), were presented to 23 volunteers (50 % women), aged 20–25, who were asked to respond whether the image was congruent or incongruent. Electrical brain activity was recorded through 20 channels to obtain the event-related potentials (ERP) associated. Lower reaction times for II and PI than C, and a greater number of incorrect trials for C were found. A N300/N400 effect appeared for AI and LI conditions with respect to C. Finally, II and LI conditions present a deflected P600 in reference to C. These findings suggest semantic of actions is sensitive to thematic role manipulations and constitute evidence in favor of a semantic processing shared between visually observed praxis and words.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138904172400086X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Semantics of actions includes three types of knowledge: a) of the function of objects and tools, b) of the actions independently of the tools, and c) of the organization of simple actions in sequences. These types of knowledge might be structured as thematic roles into the semantics of actions. To test these hypothesis, 125 illustrations, divided into five conditions: i) Congruent (C), ii) Agent Inconsistent (AI), iii) Instrument Inconsistent (II), iv) Patient Inconsistent (PI), and v) Location Inconsistent (LI), were presented to 23 volunteers (50 % women), aged 20–25, who were asked to respond whether the image was congruent or incongruent. Electrical brain activity was recorded through 20 channels to obtain the event-related potentials (ERP) associated. Lower reaction times for II and PI than C, and a greater number of incorrect trials for C were found. A N300/N400 effect appeared for AI and LI conditions with respect to C. Finally, II and LI conditions present a deflected P600 in reference to C. These findings suggest semantic of actions is sensitive to thematic role manipulations and constitute evidence in favor of a semantic processing shared between visually observed praxis and words.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial.
The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition.
Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.